WeightLossBanter

WeightLossBanter (http://www.weightlossbanter.net/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.weightlossbanter.net/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Funny! (http://www.weightlossbanter.net/showthread.php?t=36622)

Mitch@this_is_not_a_real_address.com July 7th, 2006 04:32 AM

Funny!
 
I killfiled Queen of Cans and Jars ages ago, because she was so
negative and nasty.

I posted a question about tattoos in another group, and who should
respond but......?

Killfiled her there, too. :-)

Dally July 7th, 2006 04:54 AM

Funny!
 
wrote:

I killfiled Queen of Cans and Jars ages ago, because she was so
negative and nasty.

I posted a question about tattoos in another group, and who should
respond but......?

Killfiled her there, too. :-)


Yup. You can stay ignorant if you try hard enough.

Dally

Willow Herself July 7th, 2006 05:26 AM

Funny!
 

wrote in message
...
I killfiled Queen of Cans and Jars ages ago, because she was so
negative and nasty.

I posted a question about tattoos in another group, and who should
respond but......?

Killfiled her there, too. :-)


:o( She can be huh... abrupt, but she also pretty darn intelligent... when
she sets her mind to it she does bring some very interesting point to
conversations..

You should open your mind.... you might be surprised to discover that she's
the one saying the one thing that will help you when you really need it..

By the way, who's being negative and nasty just now?

Will~



The Queen of Cans and Jars July 7th, 2006 06:13 AM

Funny!
 
Dally wrote:

wrote:

I killfiled Queen of Cans and Jars ages ago, because she was so
negative and nasty.

I posted a question about tattoos in another group, and who should
respond but......?

Killfiled her there, too. :-)


Yup. You can stay ignorant if you try hard enough.


I gave him a perfectly friendly, helpful response.

Ignorant isn't quite the word for it, I don't think.


The Historian July 7th, 2006 11:37 AM

Funny!
 

wrote:
I killfiled Queen of Cans and Jars ages ago, because she was so
negative and nasty.


Hi Mitch,

At first I plonked the Queen as well, for the very same reasons you
did. However, I changed my mind. She's abrasive, but not for
abrasiveness' sake. There's a big difference between her posts and
those of abusive trolls; unfortunately, it took me a little longer than
most to see that there was much wisdom amidst her strong talk.

I still think her coffee thread with Kirk was pretty silly, however.

Neil
385/309/220


Mitch@this_is_not_a_real_address.com July 7th, 2006 01:43 PM

Funny!
 
She was pretty abusive to me, and totally unprovoked. Not to mention
the profanity. With her gone, the environment has been really
supportive.

But that's what killfiles are for...we each get to choose.

The Queen of Cans and Jars July 7th, 2006 02:21 PM

Funny!
 
The Historian wrote:

I still think her coffee thread with Kirk was pretty silly, however.


If advising people to eliminate sources of excessive, non-nutritive
calories from their daily intake is wrong, I don't want to be right.


The Queen of Cans and Jars July 7th, 2006 02:21 PM

Funny!
 
Willow Herself wrote:

wrote:

I killfiled Queen of Cans and Jars ages ago, because she was so
negative and nasty.

I posted a question about tattoos in another group, and who should
respond but......?

Killfiled her there, too. :-)


:o( She can be huh... abrupt, but she also pretty darn intelligent... when
she sets her mind to it she does bring some very interesting point to
conversations..


Thank you, Willow.

You should open your mind.... you might be surprised to discover that she's
the one saying the one thing that will help you when you really need it..


Oddly enough, I'm the only person who's responded to his post in rab.
And I've given exactly the answer any of the other regulars there would
give. But, you know, since it's coming from me it must be wrong!

By the way, who's being negative and nasty just now?


Self-righteous types like Mitch always think their negativity is
justified. They cling to it like a safety blanket.



Kirk Is July 7th, 2006 02:23 PM

Funny!
 
The Historian wrote:
I still think her coffee thread with Kirk was pretty silly, however.


....he reads, glancing over at the fragmented icy remnants of his large
iced coffee w/ skim milk, rolls his eyes and grins.

--Kirk, 227/212.5/180

--
QUOTEBLOG: http://kisrael.com SKEPTIC MORTALITY: http://kisrael.com/mortal
Life's too short for sentences that begin "life's too short for..."
--Slashdot

Kirk Is July 7th, 2006 02:51 PM

Back to Coffee WAS: Funny!
 
The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
The Historian wrote:


I still think her coffee thread with Kirk was pretty silly, however.


If advising people to eliminate sources of excessive, non-nutritive
calories from their daily intake is wrong, I don't want to be right.


I really didn't mean to get back into this, but...

In general, you're correct.

Without this daily half hour of pleasurable sipping, I could be losing
roughly (140 cals * (30 days / month) * (1 lb / 3500 cals)) = 1.2 lbs more
per month than I am now.

--Kirk, 227/212.5/180

--
QUOTEBLOG: http://kisrael.com SKEPTIC MORTALITY: http://kisrael.com/mortal
"While some look at what is and ask 'why?' and others look at what could be
ask 'why not?' I look at my coffee table and ask 'where are my sunglasses?'"
--Paul Mather, subatomic humor


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
WeightLossBanter