The 2PD-OMER Approach for permanent weight loss
 

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist

**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

Hahahahahahahahahaha...

Now it's also an acronym. Too, too funny. This house built on
intellectual sand has just had a second storey added. Oh, sure.
That'll make it stronger. Probably the negative testimonials will help
hold it up for the 90,000 people doing it with not one dropout.

Maybe Mel Gibson will make a movie about it. Guy with a lab coat
crucifies himself by nailing his hyper-inflated ego to the wall of
absurdity. Maybe get Jim Carrey to play Chung. Or Ronald McDonald.

LOL

Bob

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Lord Christ's
holy name.

May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
you too will have eternal life and the unimaginable riches of His
infinite kingdom.

Here's how:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His
presence known here on Usenet :-)

Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.

Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist


**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:


Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running
around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his
insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually
posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says
he writes honestly. Bwah...

LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking
and one for the feet in the mouth.

Poor, poor Chung...

Bob

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:


Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running
around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his
insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually
posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says
he writes honestly. Bwah...

LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking
and one for the feet in the mouth.

Poor, poor Chung...

Bob

Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:

11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you.


You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Lord Christ's
holy name.

May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
you too will have eternal life and the unimaginable riches of His
everlasting kingdom.

Here's how:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His
presence known here on Usenet :-)

Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.

Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist


**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.


Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running
around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his
insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually
posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says
he writes honestly. Bwah...

LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking
and one for the feet in the mouth.

Poor, poor Chung...

Bob

Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:

11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly
detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the
slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale
often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own
image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging
toward considering himself a prophet.

Bwah...

Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several
rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to
understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news
is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because
of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser.

Bob

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
snip
Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:

11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly
detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the
slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale
often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own
image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging
toward considering himself a prophet.

Bwah...

Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several
rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to
understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news
is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because
of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser.

Bob

You seem to have forgotten about Whom I have chosen to serve.


At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist

**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

snip

Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:

11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly
detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the
slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale
often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own
image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging
toward considering himself a prophet.

Bwah...

Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several
rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to
understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news
is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because
of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser.

Bob

You seem to have forgotten about Whom I have chosen to serve.

Nah. Your ego gallops all over your posts. Your limitless capacity for
self-aggrandizement defines your crippled vision and your obsessive
impulsions. You serve yourself.

You seem to not grasp the essence of what "serve" means. I'll help out
here and tell you what it isn't:

* It isn't deliberately trying to harm people in real life.
* It isn't refusing to admit error after having it shown to you.
* It isn't telling people that they're blessed or not.
* It isn't claiming "truth discernment" when it's obvious you can't.
* It isn't acting the malicious fool and claiming that people condemn
you for your Christianity when it's your actions that shape your image.

Your belligerent insistence of absolute and infallible correctness is
the surest sign of the blind fool. Your efforts to impugn anyone who
is critical of your charade show you to be ego-bound. If you truly
served, you would invite people to partake of the wisdom of Jesus.
Instead you justify your viciousness by citing the example of Jesus
showing anger on the temple steps - and thereby forgiving your self
for rather serious transgressions - rather than the loving ones. You
pervert the meanings of biblical passages - say nasty things and claim
it's being "salty" as in the "salt of the earth" - to justify your
mean-spiritedness, after the fact.

The best recent example is your whole business of the omer and what
fantasy you've imbued it with. You've asserted it's about 2 pounds
because that's enough food for anyone to live on. Apparently God
disagrees with you because an omer is actually a measure of volume,
not weight, and it's 3.7 liters according to reliable sources.

Whom do you serve...? No one with a generous spirit. No one with a
kind vision. No one with a sense of justice. No one with a need for
truth. Sad, sad, sad...

Bob

It seems that you have relapsed into your old obsessions about the
2PD-OMER Approach.

You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Christ's name.

May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
you too will have eternal life and the limitlessly interesting riches of
His everlasting kingdom.

Here's how:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His
presence known here on Usenet :-)

Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.

Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist


**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129


"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

snip

Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:

11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly
detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the
slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale
often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own
image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging
toward considering himself a prophet.

Bwah...

Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several
rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to
understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news
is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because
of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser.

Bob

You seem to have forgotten about Whom I have chosen to serve.

Nah. Your ego gallops all over your posts. Your limitless capacity for
self-aggrandizement defines your crippled vision and your obsessive
impulsions. You serve yourself.

You seem to not grasp the essence of what "serve" means. I'll help out
here and tell you what it isn't:

* It isn't deliberately trying to harm people in real life.
* It isn't refusing to admit error after having it shown to you.
* It isn't telling people that they're blessed or not.
* It isn't claiming "truth discernment" when it's obvious you can't.
* It isn't acting the malicious fool and claiming that people condemn
you for your Christianity when it's your actions that shape your image.

Your belligerent insistence of absolute and infallible correctness is
the surest sign of the blind fool. Your efforts to impugn anyone who
is critical of your charade show you to be ego-bound. If you truly
served, you would invite people to partake of the wisdom of Jesus.
Instead you justify your viciousness by citing the example of Jesus
showing anger on the temple steps - and thereby forgiving your self
for rather serious transgressions - rather than the loving ones. You
pervert the meanings of biblical passages - say nasty things and claim
it's being "salty" as in the "salt of the earth" - to justify your
mean-spiritedness, after the fact.

The best recent example is your whole business of the omer and what
fantasy you've imbued it with. You've asserted it's about 2 pounds
because that's enough food for anyone to live on. Apparently God
disagrees with you because an omer is actually a measure of volume,
not weight, and it's 3.7 liters according to reliable sources.

Whom do you serve...? No one with a generous spirit. No one with a
kind vision. No one with a sense of justice. No one with a need for
truth. Sad, sad, sad...

Bob