On May 24, 11:55*am, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:21:46 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:
Did you not read that article I posted today? That's typical, it's not
an anomaly.
It's sure typical of your methods.

Yes, it is. To give examples, which I was asked for.

*The FDA withdrew their recommendation.*

I wonder why they did that?

Simple. They changed their opinion based on new
data.





You take one doctor's
opinion that is negative and instantly it becomes the gold
standard of truth.

Since you are unable to reason deductively, let's see if you can prove
him wrong.


Again, I can see why you so easily go wrong. YOU
are the one choosing to believe this one editorial
writer. YOU are then using that to slam and indict the
entire medical establishment without ever considering
any other views or possibilities. It's up to YOU to prove he's
right.





You should be thanking this doctor, and here you are impugning his
efforts to save lives.

You're a real piece of work, asshole.

More vulgarity which is to be expected from someone
who's getting demolished here right and left an can't
argue the facts.




One doctor said it in an editorial and it's
negative about a drug company on a very complex subject.
Yet instantly, that one doctor must be right and what the
drug company did is criminal.....

Yes, it is criminal, unless you think "improvement in quality of life"
is just another way to say "deaths" and "heart attacks."


Another example of faulty logic.





How can a person of even normal intelligence come away with any other
conclusion, that they did it deliberately, and with deception!

Very easy. *It's just the opinion of one doctor on a
complex subject. *And we have not even heard the other
side. * Capiche?

We heard the other side when the FDA withdrew it's recommendations.


Sure, based on new data. Now if the FDA is really
evil as you claim, why would they change their opinion
at all?