On May 20, 1:19*pm, Dogman wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2012 13:39:46 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger

wrote:

[...]

You could ask yourself other questions, too, like why they keep doing
it. Ignorance? Arrogance? $$$? Or maybe it's just that they fear
people calling them "loons" and "morons"?

Or getting charged with malpractice for prescribing a high carb diet to
people with a broken carb processing metabolism.

That would fall into the "$$$" category, and it helps to explain the
AIDS (and other scientific, medical and political) mistakes, too.

Self-preservation is a powerful force.

--
Dogman


And there you have it again folks. Notice which poster
here is starting new threads specifically to flame up
the debate again where he's been thoroughly discredited.
That is the second post now where you've done it.
Was the AIDS comment really, really necessary?
We know you're an AIDS denialist. We know you deny
that HPV causes cancer in women. We know you deny
that any virus can cause cancer period. We know you deny that the
whole field of oncoviruses exist. So, why
continue to discredit yourself?

And I find it curious that you tell James that the case
for LC is proven. Now I think the LC approach is
right. But it's certainly no where near as proven at this
point as the overwhelming proof that HIV causes AIDS. There, since
you sought to go there, by bringing this
up in yet another thread, here we are. Happy now?