What are those, i.e. mild high, severe, in numbers. I hate articles that
give descriptions that are so vague when numbers are clearly appropriate.

Dogman wrote:
|
http://www.drbriffa.com/2012/08/17/t...e-ineffective/
|
|
http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD0067...on-are-unclear
|
| "Treating mild high blood pressure with drugs found to be ineffective"
|
| Hmmm. Ya don't say?
|
| "We've long known that almost all benefit from treating severe
| hypertension comes with lowering BP [blood pressure] just a little. On
| the other hand, efforts to lower BP to 'normal,' typically requiring
| multiple drugs, are not only usually unsuccessful but produce more
| harm than good, since adverse effects of intensive treatment outweigh
| the minimal marginal benefit of a little more BP 'control.' Drug
| treatment of mild hypertension..may be of great value to drug makers,
| but it was almost predictable that it would provide little or no
| benefit for patients."
|
| "Results showed that in those treated with active medication (compared
| to placebo) we
|
| At no reduced risk of developing heart disease
| At no reduced risk of stroke
| At no reduced risk of 'total cardiovascular events' (essentially
| heart attacks and strokes combined)
| At no reduced risk of overall risk of death"