On Sep 1, 1:45*pm, Dogman wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:59:01 -0400, Walter Bushell
wrote:

[...]

I suggest you take that logic a bit further and start wearing a
blindfold when you're driving. If you prefer, of course.

That's a little strong, but yes, he won't know if the Carbquick is
spiking his blood sugar if he doesn't test.

Ignorance is bliss, no?

Has anyone run n=1 experiments on Carbquick and found it copesetic?

I would guess that it works for some, doesn't work for others,
depending on your definition of "copesetic."

I'd be more interested in how wheat (which, let us not forget, is what
CarbQuik is made from) affected my LDL particle levels, etc., which
can be easily measured. And how eliminating it made me feel, etc.

Or one can simply choose to remain ignorant.

You're really amazing. So now, it's not just the possible impact
on blood sugar levels I'm supposed to measure for a product like
Carbquik, which, like so many others here, I've been using for years,
in moderation.
Now I'm supposed to figure out how it effects not only my blood
glucose, but now also my "LDL particles, etc".
Like many others doing LC, I use some products like Carbquik to
enjoy some pancakes. Now, I'm supposed to somehow do an
experiment to figure out it's impact on my LDL, which anyone with
half a brain knows is virtually impossible for any of us to do, just
because you say so?