View Single Post
  #7  
Old May 28th, 2012, 06:50 PM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 993
Default Montagnier, off the deep end

On May 28, 12:38*pm, Dogman wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2012 13:06:36 -0300, James Warren

wrote:

[...]

Didn't this discovery earn him a Nobel? Also this discovery
has been corroborated by numerous others.


Actually, it was stolen from him by Robert Gallo, who's more than a
kook - he's a CROOK. And it was a big scandal at the time.



Of course James is correct again. Montagnier indeed did
win the Nobel prize for discovering HIV. Gallo, did not.
Now it's also interesting that the Nobel prize in 2008
that Montagnier won was split between him and Harald
Hausen. What did Hausen do to earn his half of the
Nobel prize? He discovered that HPV causes cervical
cancer. Which is really remarkable, since Dogman
claims that no virus can cause cancer period. Yet the
co-recipient of the Nobel with the guy who Dogman uses as a reference
was the scientist who proved it. Ain't
that special?






Since then apparently, has been a kook.


So...your belief that HIV causes AIDS is due to a kook and a crook.



It's quite remarkable how you're the one who first brought
up Montagnier. You gave us a link to a video of him
giving an interview in an attempt to use him to support
your case that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. When it turns
out he's a loon, then you claim James is the one citing
him? Good grief. You'd be a good candidate for
Minister of Information for some two bit dictator.

For the record, I brought up the loony electromagnetic
emissions from DNA claims many posts ago. Apparently
Montagnier presented it at a conference and people
were stunned at how loony it was.




But whatever you do, don't read Duesberg's book!


No problem there. I'd as soon read a book from a
holocaust denier. He's thoroughly discredited himself
for decades. And apparently reading his current stuff
hasn't done you any good because you're completely
incapable of presenting any coherent arguments
supporting Duesburg, just the old "Read the book..."