Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

Hahahahahahahahahaha...

Now it's also an acronym. Too, too funny. This house built on
intellectual sand has just had a second storey added. Oh, sure.
That'll make it stronger. Probably the negative testimonials will help
hold it up for the 90,000 people doing it with not one dropout.

Maybe Mel Gibson will make a movie about it. Guy with a lab coat
crucifies himself by nailing his hyper-inflated ego to the wall of
absurdity. Maybe get Jim Carrey to play Chung. Or Ronald McDonald.

LOL

Bob