On Oct 6, 10:41*pm, Dogman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:46:58 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:

[...]



And I know how that must just break your drug-loving, drug-pushing
heart. BOO freakin' hoo.
Then the report is one half-assed presentation.

Actually, you're just a half-assed intellect.

To indict
gluten and not have one word about the fact that
the diet was actually a low glycemic diet in the summary
is completely *misleading.

It's not misleading at all. That's why it's necessary to read the
details of studies, and not just the abstracts.



Yeah right. According to you, the patient was actually on
a low glycemic diet. Yet in the summary all they talk about
is that the diet was gluten free and how that allegedly
produced the results. And THAT is the scientific method?
It would be like me putting someone on Atkins LC, having
them lose 100 lbs, have normal BG levels, etc, and then
writing an article summayr where I talk about how they gave
up jelly beans.

But it does show the methods and intellect by which you
have arrived at the remarkable conclusions that:

HIV is harmless
HIV is not the cause of AIDS
AIDS is caused by poor diet and lack of sleep
No virus can cause cancer


Anything else you'd like to add to your list of ignorance for
all to see today?