yeah i saw that too, that chitosan was the only difference in the two.
I am not sure why i lost so much more with three then 2...ive tried
lots of other stuff too and stacker 3 just takes the cake and
deffnintly worked the best.
thanks for the link. Yeah i often find stacker overpriced..i actually
got my last bottle for ALOT cheaper off of an e bay store. gotta love
e bay, haha.



(jamie) wrote in message ...
Brandon wrote:
anyways, i was just trying to share it was a good weight loss pill,
take it or leave it. im not a spammer,lmao, as IM NOT SELLING
ANYTHING. And enough of the rude comments.

The only difference between Stacker 2 and Stacker 3, according to their
own add copy, is that Stacker 3 added chitosan (proven in a few medical
studies to be useless for weightloss, especially in the amount that
would fit in a capsule with the other ingredients).

Probably the reason you found the 3 more effective is that herbal stacks
vary hugely in the amount of actual ephedrine alkaloid, from batch to
batch - anywhere from half the dose listed on most bottles, to double
the dose. Stacker brand doesn't even bother to list the amount it was
*intended* to have, so you could be getting any random amount.

Stack brand is overpriced compared to some others.
See http://www.drumlib.com