On 28/09/2012 11:41 AM, Dogman wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:41:17 -0300, James Warren
wrote:

On 27/09/2012 7:35 PM, Dogman wrote:

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:19:55 -0300, James Warren
wrote:

[...]
Yes, carefully controlled experiments are capable of teasing out what
effects are caused by what uninfluenced by idiosyncratic individual
variations.

James, have you found that low-carb "study" yet? The one where they
used "carefully controlled experiments [that] teas[ed] out what
effects are caused by what uninfluenced by idiosyncratic individual
variations" yet?


You claim to champion the scientific method yet you hold in high esteem
anecdotes and testimonials. Your understanding of the scientific method
is suspect.

So, in other words, James, you just can't seem to find that low-carb
"study" that made you try it, right?

The one where they used "carefully controlled experiments [that]
teas[ed] out what effects are caused by what uninfluenced by
idiosyncratic individual variations" yet?

I didn't think so.

I also think that speaks volumes about you.

Yes, I champion the scientific method, and so should everyone. I also
hold all kinds of information in high esteem. No, I don't sit on my
hands all day, frozen in time, waiting for "studies" that may or may
not ever come along, I use what information I have available to me.

Then, just like Sherlock Holmes might do, I deduce. And what I deduce
about your latest performance is that you're still a TROLL.

Some things never change.

So back in the bozo bin you go.

Bub bye.




--
-jw