On May 24, 11:54*am, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:32:59 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:

[...]

You know when you'll read Duesberg's book? When one day, say, while
applying for a new life insurance policy, you're asked to take a blood
test, and then it comes back HIV+. *Then you'll read the book.

Not much chance of that.

You better hope so.

Those that believe the AIDS denialist nonsense supported by
the book, how do they fare?

I guess no one is allowed to die today, unless it's from "AIDS
complications."

Sheesh.

The point is those denialist chose to treat their own AIDS
per the suggestions of denialists like you, eg with diet and
sleep instead of HIv druges. And they are dead. The survival
rate today for those on HIV drugs is excellent.

Where is the study showing that approach works? Hmmm?
Montagnier claims HIV can be eliminated from the body of
those infected via diet, sanitation and "oxidative stress relief".
Where is his study? Where are his patients?

On the other hand, we do have numerous studies that
show the current HIV drug protocol works. You can see
it directly in the drastically reduced death rates from AIDS
when those drugs are used. Now that's real science.




Did you watch the film I linked to about the many people who are still
alive today after testing positive for HIV, but have refused AIDS
drugs? Some for over 26 years?

Which proves nothing, because once infected with HIV the
time it takes to develop full blown AIDS can vary from a
few years to decades. A small percentage may not
developed AIDS after 26 years. It's possible some very
small percentage may never develop the full blown disease.
So what? It proves absolutely
nothing about HIV not being the cause of AIDS. There are
other diseases caused by viruses where the long term
outcome varies, hepatitis being one example.

It's just another example of denialists attempting to confuse
people with typical denialist, weird conspiracy theory type tactics.
Ignore the mountains of evidence and focus on the margins.