January 4th, 2006, 02:08 PM
posted to alt.support.diet,alt.support.diet.weightwatchers
|
|
A question about calories - metabolism and"starvationmode"and Weight Watchers
go to the baskin robbins web site or to the tcby site and compare, Lee, who
thinks there will be no fat free anything in heaven,
Doug Lerner wrote in message
...
If they had fat-free icecream - or fat free cheeses here I would.
Unfortunately they don't...
sigh
Just another reason why counting points really wouldn't be helpful here in
Tokyo.
doug
On 1/3/06 10:08 PM, in article , "Stormmee"
wrote:
yes but the best example is next time you are in the grocery look at the
same flavor of ice-cream in regular and low fat versions, also where I
noticed it was in prepackaged pudding, it worked out that regular full
fat
full sugar pudding was 3 and 4 points, take out the fat down to 2 and
take
out the sugar down to one, the fat acts as a double penalty, sorta
counting
the fat twice, Lee, who thinks generally 50 per point is a good ballpark
but
when counting points accuracy is everything, Lee
Doug Lerner wrote in message
...
On 1/3/06 9:12 PM, in article ,
"Stormmee"
wrote:
Doug,
I can't explain it but the effect of the fiber can be big, so can the
fat,
if you could get a look at a point slide you being good with numbers
could
see this,
I have the equation...
points = calories / 50 - fiber * 0.2 + fat * 0.083
with a maximum of 4 fiber grams allowed
It still seems to me that this is basically 50 points per calorie for
almost
everything realistic, though you an stretch and find certain exceptions
of
course.
doug
|