Can a low-carb diet fail if you take in too many calories?

Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:

There was no other Xpost to s.m.c within this thread until you did so with
this post!


Sorry Mu's saltiness bothers you.

You will be in my prayers, neighbor whom I love.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

On 17 Aug 2004 20:18:28 GMT, jamie wrote:


MU wrote:

PS. Btw, since you decided to insult Chung AND delete the Xpost to SMC, I
assisted by reestablishing it. Now no one can claim you to be trying to
hide libel away in ASDLC now, can they?


In order to be libel, an identifiable person must be defamed,

That would be Chung......

the
plaintiff must prove injury, such as damage to reputation or income,
and must prove the statement false.

All of which are easily attributed to you via Google.....

Morphing trolls who claim to
have invincible reputations and credibility can't be subject to libel.

Chung is not a "morphing troll".

That you brownnose Andrew and attempt to have him to fight your battles
for you by crossposting might be considered defamatory to you, if it
weren't true and you were identifiable, but isn't defamatory to Andrew.

Many have found that behavior such as yours, libelous behavior, has
consequence.

Had I said actually anything defamatory about Andrew, it was you who
identified Dr. Chung, who seems to be quite capable of defaming
himself without your help.

Whatever the above means, and I have no clue, you have done what you have
done and no amount of redirection will undo it.

On 17 Aug 2004 20:18:28 GMT, jamie wrote:


MU wrote:

PS. Btw, since you decided to insult Chung AND delete the Xpost to SMC, I
assisted by reestablishing it. Now no one can claim you to be trying to
hide libel away in ASDLC now, can they?


In order to be libel, an identifiable person must be defamed,

That would be Chung......

the
plaintiff must prove injury, such as damage to reputation or income,
and must prove the statement false.

All of which are easily attributed to you via Google.....

Morphing trolls who claim to
have invincible reputations and credibility can't be subject to libel.

Chung is not a "morphing troll".

That you brownnose Andrew and attempt to have him to fight your battles
for you by crossposting might be considered defamatory to you, if it
weren't true and you were identifiable, but isn't defamatory to Andrew.

Many have found that behavior such as yours, libelous behavior, has
consequence.

Had I said actually anything defamatory about Andrew, it was you who
identified Dr. Chung, who seems to be quite capable of defaming
himself without your help.

Whatever the above means, and I have no clue, you have done what you have
done and no amount of redirection will undo it.

As a Christian, I find your demeanor, attitude and condescending manner
very offensive. Where does all this stuff you write here fit into God's
purpose (not yours)? Does all your silly arguing please and glorify Him?
You accuse others of self-worship? Where is your own Christ-like humility?
You may not care what we think of you, but what about the humble person whom
you claim to serve?

"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote in message
...
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:

There was no other Xpost to s.m.c within this thread until you did so
with
this post!


Sorry Mu's saltiness bothers you.

You will be in my prayers, neighbor whom I love.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

As a Christian, I find your demeanor, attitude and condescending manner
very offensive. Where does all this stuff you write here fit into God's
purpose (not yours)? Does all your silly arguing please and glorify Him?
You accuse others of self-worship? Where is your own Christ-like humility?
You may not care what we think of you, but what about the humble person whom
you claim to serve?

"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote in message
...
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:

There was no other Xpost to s.m.c within this thread until you did so
with
this post!


Sorry Mu's saltiness bothers you.

You will be in my prayers, neighbor whom I love.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:33:41 +0100, Em wrote:

As a Christian,

What religion?

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:33:41 +0100, Em wrote:

As a Christian,

What religion?

MU wrote:

On 17 Aug 2004 04:51:08 GMT, jamie wrote:

Credibility, jamie, comes not from real names (is yours jamie
with a small "j") or "made up qualifications"; it comes from
the test of time, the test of knowledge and the tests of
scrutiny.

Over to you.

Your Roosenet credibility is of no concern to me, either; as far
as I'm concerned, you have none. Nor am I interested in the sort
of extended flamewars of verbal oneupsmanship that is your
primary interest in posting.

Oh, I see you aren't interested in exploring my base of knowledge,
eh? Let's see what other Usenet insults you have in store........

http://tinyurl.com/hdex
http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html
http://tinyurl.com/royd

Perhaps Bob would still be interested, since you lost interest in
having your hat and ass handed to you in MFW

Seriously? As to misc.fitness.weights, those participants know
exactly where I can be found and have known for years now.

Like jamie said, ran your ass out.

However, the way you always manage to keep your nose so high in
the air whilst keeping it firmly imbedded in Andrew's backside is
an amazing feat of balance. It might be worthy of the
brown-nosing hall of fame, were you not so often compelled to
tag-team him in to cover for you by crossposting.

Translation: jamie passes on testing "Roose"; his knowledge,
expertise etc.; prefers to continue with personal insults, baseless
as they are.

'Nuff said.

LOL Right. Note the quotes around "Roose" as though it weren't
precisely honest. But then, why stop with just one name?

http://tinyurl.com/hdex
http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html
http://tinyurl.com/royd

Testing "Roose." What a completely hilarious concept.

Bob

MU wrote:

On 17 Aug 2004 04:51:08 GMT, jamie wrote:

Credibility, jamie, comes not from real names (is yours jamie
with a small "j") or "made up qualifications"; it comes from
the test of time, the test of knowledge and the tests of
scrutiny.

Over to you.

Your Roosenet credibility is of no concern to me, either; as far
as I'm concerned, you have none. Nor am I interested in the sort
of extended flamewars of verbal oneupsmanship that is your
primary interest in posting.

Oh, I see you aren't interested in exploring my base of knowledge,
eh? Let's see what other Usenet insults you have in store........

http://tinyurl.com/hdex
http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html
http://tinyurl.com/royd

Perhaps Bob would still be interested, since you lost interest in
having your hat and ass handed to you in MFW

Seriously? As to misc.fitness.weights, those participants know
exactly where I can be found and have known for years now.

Like jamie said, ran your ass out.

However, the way you always manage to keep your nose so high in
the air whilst keeping it firmly imbedded in Andrew's backside is
an amazing feat of balance. It might be worthy of the
brown-nosing hall of fame, were you not so often compelled to
tag-team him in to cover for you by crossposting.

Translation: jamie passes on testing "Roose"; his knowledge,
expertise etc.; prefers to continue with personal insults, baseless
as they are.

'Nuff said.

LOL Right. Note the quotes around "Roose" as though it weren't
precisely honest. But then, why stop with just one name?

http://tinyurl.com/hdex
http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html
http://tinyurl.com/royd

Testing "Roose." What a completely hilarious concept.

Bob

Chrissy Cruiser wrote:

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:33:41 +0100, Em wrote:

As a Christian,

What religion?

You probably meant denomination.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867