If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ever hit a plateau like this?
On Dec 17, 1:55 pm, Doug Freyburger wrote:
wrote: I have hit a plateau like never before. Frustrating. ... The last three weekly weigh-ins we 11/26/07 237.5 12/3/07 236.4 (lost 1.1) 12/10/07 236.6 (gained .2?) Any thoughts from all you good folks on the subject? Advice from Dr Atkins that really applies across the board - A stall is defined as 4+ weeks without a cheat, without a new low, without a lost inch. This definition is not arbitrary. It is to teach what are and aren't realisitic in expectations. The blunt fact of it is the time scale for loss is month to month no matter that fact's been hated by every dieter in history. Scale inaccuracies, water retnetion bounce, you name it. They all conspire against any realistic expectation that loss is possible each and every week. Your most recent new low is 2 weeks ago. Therefore nothing is wrong and no reaction is called for. It's really that simple and that difficult to accept. But accept it anyways. Another consideration - Rate of loss is proportional to amount left to lose. Not, calorie deficts do NOT enter into this. Someone with 100 to lose loses faster than someone with 50 to lose loses after than someone in the last 10 pounds. By the time you no longer have 100+ to lose the rate is no longer fast enough for the weekly loss rate to overwhelm water retention bounce, and further caloric reduction does nothing to change this. You are doing fine. Really. Breath deeply. Relax. Stay with your plan. This is a great reply, thanks! And as it turns out, you are 100% correct too. I just got back from my travels, weighed myself, and found I had "lost" 5.2 lbs this week. Plateau busted. There is no way that I actually lost 5 pounds this week (I know what I ate and how much I moved), some had to have come in the preceding "plateau" weeks, but is just now showing up on the scale. Water retention makes sense to me, and is probably something I had not considered strongly enough. OK, I know now not to panic and take a longer term view. Thank you so much for your information and encouragement. -Jeff |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Ever hit a plateau like this?
On Dec 16, 1:03 pm, Del Cecchi
wrote: wrote: On Dec 16, 7:49 am, "Cubit" wrote: wrote in message ... I have hit a plateau like never before. Frustrating. I have been religiously tracking everything that goes in my mouth. I manage my calories to a 1000 daily deficit, but I eat 2000+ per day, as I exercise quite a bit. I am doing 60 minutes of elliptical a day, staying precisely at 65% max heart rate to hopefully burn fat. I am playing tennis three times a week, and I have been doing 30 minutes of strength training three times a week. Given this, I would expect to lose about 2 pounds a week, and I have been averaging a little more than that over the last ten weeks. I am 43, 6 ft, and my starting weight was 262 lbs. The last three weekly weigh-ins we 11/26/07 237.5 12/3/07 236.4 (lost 1.1) 12/10/07 236.6 (gained .2?) Where is my 2 pounds a week that I am working so hard for? According to my scale, my body fat percentage has dropped from 30 to 29 over the last three weeks, but my experience is that the body fat % readings tend to be unreliable to the tune of 1-3%, so who knows? Anyone ever hit a wall like this? My friends say, just stay the course and you will drop 3 or 4 pounds on one of your next weigh-ins. And my weight loss has come in chunks in the past. Why should this be so? What happened to 3500 calories per pound? There must be some other mechanism at work here. I weigh myself with the same scale, on the same day, first thing in the morning, naked, after visiting the restroom. Don't know how I could make the weight measurements more reliable. Any thoughts from all you good folks on the subject? Cheers, -Jeff I successfully lost a lot of weight. During the long 2 pound per week process there were a few months where I did weight training. I saw no change in my rate of weight loss. I have not read it yet, but I gather Gary Taubes new book makes a case against exercise as being effective for weightloss. To lose weight I need to eat about 1400 calories per day compared to your 2000. If your calorie measurement is accurate, the good thing is that you have established your break even burn rate: 2000 calories Now, you just need to eat less. Frequent small meals can make "eating less" easier. Thanks for replying. Small meals makes sense to me too, and I generally try to do this; will focus on it more. I sure hope that I can continue to lose weight on 2000 calories or so through exercise, as eating 1400 is just really tough for me (tried it for a while). I'll take a look at " Good Calories, Bad Calories", if that is the book you are referring to; maybe it will provide some new distinctions for me. Frankly, though, the more I read the more confusing it all gets; there are so many conflicting opinions. I've always sort of subscribed to the Dr. Dean school of its just calories in vs. out. Eat less and move more. I just don't want to eat THAT much less :-) Would rather move more if at all possible, and eat reasonably. I was hoping to use a level of eating and exercise that I could follow for the rest of my life, so I don't yo-yo. I just don't think I could go through the rest of my life eating fewer than about 2000 calories. My highest weight was 296 lbs. A couple of years ago, I lost 70 lbs, following a similar program of watching calories and exercising. In that weight loss run I did hit a short 2 week plateau, and eventually the weight started coming back off again, but I'll be darned if I can explain why. If anything, I ate slightly more coming out of the plateau rather than less. Weird. When I was re-gaining weight recently, I was probably eating about 5,000 cals a day!! So, I guess I should take some heart in the fact that, if nothing else, I have bucked the upward trend :-) Thanks for your support. Best Wishes, -Jeff Yes, and I have attributed it to fluid retention. Sometimes your body seems to want to hold on to water. It can be discouraging to see the scale stick or even jump up. If you have been eating out, that will do it because restaurant food is high in salt. Thanks for the reply. Water retention makes a lot of sense to me now. Salt is something that I am really going to have to work on. I eat tons of it in my current diet; I'm a bit of a salt-a-holic. Sounds like it would help my overall goals to find a way to gradually cut back along with the calorie considerations. Sure wouldn't hurt my blood pressure any. Thank you. -Jeff |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ever hit a plateau like this?
On Dec 17, 6:01 am, Patrick wrote:
wrote: I have hit a plateau like never before. Frustrating. I have been religiously tracking everything that goes in my mouth. I manage my calories to a 1000 daily deficit, but I eat 2000+ per day, as I exercise quite a bit. I am doing 60 minutes of elliptical a day, staying precisely at 65% max heart rate to hopefully burn fat. I am playing tennis three times a week, and I have been doing 30 minutes of strength training three times a week. Given this, I would expect to lose about 2 pounds a week, and I have been averaging a little more than that over the last ten weeks. I am 43, 6 ft, and my starting weight was 262 lbs. The last three weekly weigh-ins we 11/26/07 237.5 12/3/07 236.4 (lost 1.1) 12/10/07 236.6 (gained .2?) Where is my 2 pounds a week that I am working so hard for? According to my scale, my body fat percentage has dropped from 30 to 29 over the last three weeks, but my experience is that the body fat % readings tend to be unreliable to the tune of 1-3%, so who knows? Anyone ever hit a wall like this? My friends say, just stay the course and you will drop 3 or 4 pounds on one of your next weigh-ins. And my weight loss has come in chunks in the past. Why should this be so? What happened to 3500 calories per pound? There must be some other mechanism at work here. I weigh myself with the same scale, on the same day, first thing in the morning, naked, after visiting the restroom. Don't know how I could make the weight measurements more reliable. Any thoughts from all you good folks on the subject? Cheers, -Jeff Don't forget to shock the monkey. I run and weight train for my exercise. During the summer my runs are usually between 3 - 3.8 miles depending on how hot it is. This winter, as the temperatures cooled I took my runs up to 5.1 miles and noticed a change in my body composition towards the more lean side as well as losing about 2 - 3 pounds. Keep in mind I am at the last ten pound stage and on a good day you can just make out some definition in my abs. This from a starting weight of 285 about 12 years ago and now I hover in the 180's. Patrick Hi Patrick, sounds like you are where I want to be. Very encouraging, especially since you have kept it up for such a long stretch of time. Please help me understand the "Shock" part. Do you mean to vary (increase) my exercise a to break through when I hit a plateau? When you go back to your summer distance, do you expect to gain back the 2-3 lbs lost due to the 5 mile distance? Thanks, -Jeff |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Ever hit a plateau like this?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Ever hit a plateau like this?
On Dec 19, 6:40 am, Patrick wrote:
wrote: On Dec 17, 6:01 am, Patrick wrote: wrote: I have hit a plateau like never before. Frustrating. snip Anyone ever hit a wall like this? My friends say, just stay the course and you will drop 3 or 4 pounds on one of your next weigh-ins. And my weight loss has come in chunks in the past. Why should this be so? What happened to 3500 calories per pound? There must be some other mechanism at work here. I weigh myself with the same scale, on the same day, first thing in the morning, naked, after visiting the restroom. Don't know how I could make the weight measurements more reliable. Any thoughts from all you good folks on the subject? Cheers, -Jeff Don't forget to shock the monkey. I run and weight train for my exercise. During the summer my runs are usually between 3 - 3.8 miles depending on how hot it is. This winter, as the temperatures cooled I took my runs up to 5.1 miles and noticed a change in my body composition towards the more lean side as well as losing about 2 - 3 pounds. Keep in mind I am at the last ten pound stage and on a good day you can just make out some definition in my abs. This from a starting weight of 285 about 12 years ago and now I hover in the 180's. Patrick Hi Patrick, sounds like you are where I want to be. Very encouraging, especially since you have kept it up for such a long stretch of time. Please help me understand the "Shock" part. Do you mean to vary (increase) my exercise a to break through when I hit a plateau? When you go back to your summer distance, do you expect to gain back the 2-3 lbs lost due to the 5 mile distance? Thanks, -Jeff Hey Jeff, Shocking the system is doing something to get your body out of homeostasis. Your body gets used to doing the same thing over and over and finds a level of comfort so to speak. So shocking the system can be anything from increasing the duration or the intensity of your exercise. Likewise it can be eating more or less food. I have found that I make some progress when I eat a little more, but not much more, for a month or so. I do this without gaining more than a pound. Then I hit my body with a deficit and drop a few pounds. Like I said, I'm at those last ten pounds and they are indeed the hardest. I could probably stop where I am at, but I have an image in my mind that I would like to attain. The thing with running more is I am burning more calories and if I am already eating at a deficit my body responds by burning the stores (fat). With my weight training I have to be careful to make sure I am getting enough lean protein so my body doesn't start consuming muscle tissue also. I find that eating a cup or so of fat free cottages cheese before I sleep helps. 30 grams of protein. Now I am actually gaining weight, but can feel there is less and less fat on my body. So can my finacee. So I know it's not just my wishful thinking. LOL! As for dropping my distance once the summer hits. I don't know. I'm guessing that I will probably just maintain. I only upped my run time by about 15 minutes, so I will still be running for over a half hour at a shot. I think as long as I am staying active and not overeating I will stay the same. Besides, I already threw out all my old clothes. A long time ago in a galaxy far far away I wore I size 42 waist and XXL shirts. Now I wear size 34 and medium shirts. I could probably squeeze into 32's if I wanted to. Good luck with what you are doing. The main thing I have found with weight loss is that you have to believe in yourself and you have to make a commitment to yourself to do it. You have to want it more than anything else and you have to stick to your guns and give up yummies during the holidays and all the time until you hit your goal. It's not a short term endeavor, but a lifetime commitment to yourself and no other. It's a mind set. Happy Holidays! Eat, drink, and be merry, but do the first two in moderation Patrick Probably more than I should have written, or more than you wanted to hear, but sometimes the fingers take over. Ha! Hi Patrick, This is good stuff. I now understand what you mean by shocking the system and will keep it in mind going forward. What you are saying about the protein and weight training matches what I have heard elsewhere; sound advice, but I don't know how you can eat cottage cheese, I couldn't do it even to make all the finances in the world happy :-) Will have to substitute almonds or something. 34s and medium shirts is my holy grail. At my highest, I had a 48+ inch waist and XXL shirts were skin tight. Already down to 38's and XLs are loose, so things are thankfully trending in the right direction. It's a little scary to think that it will get even more difficult to lose weight the closer I get to my goal, but I can think of reasons why this should be so. For example, once my thighs stop rubbing together my exercise mets will go down due to the decreased friction ;-) I sincerely appreciate your encouragement. I fully intend to join you in the century club and stay there for good; some time next year if all goes as planned. Regards and happy holidays, -Jeff |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Ever hit a plateau like this?
Manipulating water retention misses the point. Body fat is the issue.
wrote in message ... On Dec 16, 1:03 pm, Del Cecchi wrote: wrote: On Dec 16, 7:49 am, "Cubit" wrote: wrote in message ... I have hit a plateau like never before. Frustrating. I have been religiously tracking everything that goes in my mouth. I manage my calories to a 1000 daily deficit, but I eat 2000+ per day, as I exercise quite a bit. I am doing 60 minutes of elliptical a day, staying precisely at 65% max heart rate to hopefully burn fat. I am playing tennis three times a week, and I have been doing 30 minutes of strength training three times a week. Given this, I would expect to lose about 2 pounds a week, and I have been averaging a little more than that over the last ten weeks. I am 43, 6 ft, and my starting weight was 262 lbs. The last three weekly weigh-ins we 11/26/07 237.5 12/3/07 236.4 (lost 1.1) 12/10/07 236.6 (gained .2?) Where is my 2 pounds a week that I am working so hard for? According to my scale, my body fat percentage has dropped from 30 to 29 over the last three weeks, but my experience is that the body fat % readings tend to be unreliable to the tune of 1-3%, so who knows? Anyone ever hit a wall like this? My friends say, just stay the course and you will drop 3 or 4 pounds on one of your next weigh-ins. And my weight loss has come in chunks in the past. Why should this be so? What happened to 3500 calories per pound? There must be some other mechanism at work here. I weigh myself with the same scale, on the same day, first thing in the morning, naked, after visiting the restroom. Don't know how I could make the weight measurements more reliable. Any thoughts from all you good folks on the subject? Cheers, -Jeff I successfully lost a lot of weight. During the long 2 pound per week process there were a few months where I did weight training. I saw no change in my rate of weight loss. I have not read it yet, but I gather Gary Taubes new book makes a case against exercise as being effective for weightloss. To lose weight I need to eat about 1400 calories per day compared to your 2000. If your calorie measurement is accurate, the good thing is that you have established your break even burn rate: 2000 calories Now, you just need to eat less. Frequent small meals can make "eating less" easier. Thanks for replying. Small meals makes sense to me too, and I generally try to do this; will focus on it more. I sure hope that I can continue to lose weight on 2000 calories or so through exercise, as eating 1400 is just really tough for me (tried it for a while). I'll take a look at " Good Calories, Bad Calories", if that is the book you are referring to; maybe it will provide some new distinctions for me. Frankly, though, the more I read the more confusing it all gets; there are so many conflicting opinions. I've always sort of subscribed to the Dr. Dean school of its just calories in vs. out. Eat less and move more. I just don't want to eat THAT much less :-) Would rather move more if at all possible, and eat reasonably. I was hoping to use a level of eating and exercise that I could follow for the rest of my life, so I don't yo-yo. I just don't think I could go through the rest of my life eating fewer than about 2000 calories. My highest weight was 296 lbs. A couple of years ago, I lost 70 lbs, following a similar program of watching calories and exercising. In that weight loss run I did hit a short 2 week plateau, and eventually the weight started coming back off again, but I'll be darned if I can explain why. If anything, I ate slightly more coming out of the plateau rather than less. Weird. When I was re-gaining weight recently, I was probably eating about 5,000 cals a day!! So, I guess I should take some heart in the fact that, if nothing else, I have bucked the upward trend :-) Thanks for your support. Best Wishes, -Jeff Yes, and I have attributed it to fluid retention. Sometimes your body seems to want to hold on to water. It can be discouraging to see the scale stick or even jump up. If you have been eating out, that will do it because restaurant food is high in salt. Thanks for the reply. Water retention makes a lot of sense to me now. Salt is something that I am really going to have to work on. I eat tons of it in my current diet; I'm a bit of a salt-a-holic. Sounds like it would help my overall goals to find a way to gradually cut back along with the calorie considerations. Sure wouldn't hurt my blood pressure any. Thank you. -Jeff |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this a plateau? | Ross Clement | General Discussion | 3 | November 6th, 2004 10:50 PM |
Plateau already? | Cathe B | General Discussion | 52 | September 15th, 2004 01:36 PM |
Plateau - Help! | Holly Duncan | Weightwatchers | 7 | June 20th, 2004 03:28 PM |
you have hit a plateau!! | missy | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 4 | June 3rd, 2004 05:32 PM |
Plateau | Herman Munster | General Discussion | 8 | January 31st, 2004 03:21 AM |