If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty
good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote:
I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
"Beverly" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote: I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories Wow - why is it I feel that running burns more calories than biking. For me, biking 16mph is a cake walk, where running for 30 mins even at 5mph (which would essentially burn fewer than 329 cals) would have me totally wiped out and I'd be exhausted. I'd gather a guess that if I wore my HRM to do both for that period of time it would be more calories running than biking. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
"LFM" wrote in message . .. "Beverly" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote: I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories Wow - why is it I feel that running burns more calories than biking. For me, biking 16mph is a cake walk, where running for 30 mins even at 5mph (which would essentially burn fewer than 329 cals) would have me totally wiped out and I'd be exhausted. I'd gather a guess that if I wore my HRM to do both for that period of time it would be more calories running than biking. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
LFM wrote: "Beverly" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote: I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories Wow - why is it I feel that running burns more calories than biking. For me, biking 16mph is a cake walk, where running for 30 mins even at 5mph (which would essentially burn fewer than 329 cals) would have me totally wiped out and I'd be exhausted. I'd gather a guess that if I wore my HRM to do both for that period of time it would be more calories running than biking. I would think it makes a big difference how you're maintaining the 16 mph on the bike. If it's fairly flat ground it's not too hard to maintain but if it's rollers or hills you need to expend much more energy to do the 16. It's fairly easy for me to maintain that speed on the local rail-to-trails but would require twice as much effort from me to do it on hills. I agree the HRM would probably give a much higher calorie count for the hilly 16 mph. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
"LFM" wrote in message . .. "Beverly" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote: I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories Wow - why is it I feel that running burns more calories than biking. For me, biking 16mph is a cake walk, where running for 30 mins even at 5mph (which would essentially burn fewer than 329 cals) would have me totally wiped out and I'd be exhausted. I'd gather a guess that if I wore my HRM to do both for that period of time it would be more calories running than biking. they say a person will burn an average of 100 calories per mile, whether they walk it or run/jog it. Not at all true for me, and I'm guessing it has something to do with being conditioned to that specific exercise. I burn around 12 calories per minute and have slow 12 minute mile, so I burn almost 150 per mile. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? Thanks for the link. At home, I've been using the Tony Little Gazelle Platinum. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
"Beverly" wrote in message ... LFM wrote: "Beverly" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote: I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories Wow - why is it I feel that running burns more calories than biking. For me, biking 16mph is a cake walk, where running for 30 mins even at 5mph (which would essentially burn fewer than 329 cals) would have me totally wiped out and I'd be exhausted. I'd gather a guess that if I wore my HRM to do both for that period of time it would be more calories running than biking. I would think it makes a big difference how you're maintaining the 16 mph on the bike. If it's fairly flat ground it's not too hard to maintain but if it's rollers or hills you need to expend much more energy to do the 16. It's fairly easy for me to maintain that speed on the local rail-to-trails but would require twice as much effort from me to do it on hills. I agree the HRM would probably give a much higher calorie count for the hilly 16 mph. Hills? What are those? (nearest hill, other than an interstate overpass is 100 miles from my house). It also depends on the bike as well. My old hybrid maxed out at 16mph. (that would be in top gears, and I would be freespooling the peddles so I couldn't peddle any faster). It was geared for mountain biking and hills. My current mountain bike and hybrids are easy to maintain a consistent ride speed of 15 - 18mph for long distances and they top out at 24+ (or I should say, I max out my personal power at that speed). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
"determined" wrote in message . .. "LFM" wrote in message . .. "Beverly" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote: I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories Wow - why is it I feel that running burns more calories than biking. For me, biking 16mph is a cake walk, where running for 30 mins even at 5mph (which would essentially burn fewer than 329 cals) would have me totally wiped out and I'd be exhausted. I'd gather a guess that if I wore my HRM to do both for that period of time it would be more calories running than biking. they say a person will burn an average of 100 calories per mile, whether they walk it or run/jog it. Not at all true for me, and I'm guessing it has something to do with being conditioned to that specific exercise. I burn around 12 calories per minute and have slow 12 minute mile, so I burn almost 150 per mile. um, what is a "slow 12 min mile"? 12 mins it 12 mins, no matter how you time it. :-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Calories per minute burned
"LFM" wrote in message . .. "determined" wrote in message . .. "LFM" wrote in message . .. "Beverly" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 7, 1:17 am, "1fitness" wrote: I've been using an elliptical trainer at night and been working up a pretty good sweat. What is the best workout that can be done in the house which will burn the most calories per minute assuming it is done at the same intensity as any other workout? www.caloriesperhour.com is a good site for comparing calories burned for different exercises. What exercise equipment do you have available at home? I have a treadmill and an indoor trainer for my bike. Here are some comparisons for me using 30 minutes for the exercise time: Walking at 4 mph - 164 calories Running at 6 mph - 329 calories Biking at 16 mph - 355 calories Wow - why is it I feel that running burns more calories than biking. For me, biking 16mph is a cake walk, where running for 30 mins even at 5mph (which would essentially burn fewer than 329 cals) would have me totally wiped out and I'd be exhausted. I'd gather a guess that if I wore my HRM to do both for that period of time it would be more calories running than biking. they say a person will burn an average of 100 calories per mile, whether they walk it or run/jog it. Not at all true for me, and I'm guessing it has something to do with being conditioned to that specific exercise. I burn around 12 calories per minute and have slow 12 minute mile, so I burn almost 150 per mile. um, what is a "slow 12 min mile"? 12 mins it 12 mins, no matter how you time it. :-) A 12 minute mile is pretty slow for most runners.... I'm trying to go S L O W like everyone keeps telling me! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
calories burned after work out? | dvdrx | General Discussion | 0 | September 4th, 2004 06:22 AM |
Calories burned question | jmk | General Discussion | 5 | February 19th, 2004 04:57 PM |
A ? regarding calories burned | CaityH | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 33 | January 26th, 2004 04:00 PM |
Calories burned just by breathing | [email protected] | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | January 9th, 2004 01:27 AM |
Calories burned during exercise | bicker 2003 | General Discussion | 5 | September 23rd, 2003 01:01 AM |