A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

To eat or not to eat...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 28th, 2008, 08:10 PM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
Prisoner at War
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 169
Default To eat or not to eat...

On Jan 27, 10:59 pm, forest demon wrote:
What are peoples thoughts on eating or aerobics, first thing in the
morning. I've done both in the past, but wanted to hear what people
have to say. in other words, is there a benefit to doing aerobics when
waking, and then eat afterwards....or eat, wait 90 minutes or so and
then do the aerobics.

I'n not into lifting weights or having huge muscle mass. i also like
doing the three hour meal interval; however, not eating within the
first half hour of rising contradicts my question above, i know.

thanks folks.....

-
fd



Like 99% of everything having to do with health and fitness, you're
going to get opinions all over the place, each one with its
"scientific studies" backing it up.

I've heard that cardio in the morning before breakfast is best for
burning calories. Just like I've heard that that doesn't matter, that
it doesn't matter whether you do it in the morning or before
breakfast, as far as caloric expenditure is concerned.

Me personally, I've done both and haven't noticed any difference
either way. I think it's more psychological than physiological.
  #2  
Old January 28th, 2008, 09:18 PM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
forest demon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default To eat or not to eat...

On Jan 28, 1:10*pm, Prisoner at War wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:59 pm, forest demon wrote:

What are peoples thoughts on eating or aerobics, first thing in the
morning. *I've done both in the past, but wanted to hear what people
have to say. in other words, is there a benefit to doing aerobics when
waking, and then eat afterwards....or eat, wait 90 minutes or so and
then do the aerobics.


I'n not into lifting weights or having huge muscle mass. i also like
doing the three hour meal interval; however, not eating within the
first half hour of rising contradicts my question above, i know.


thanks folks.....


-
fd


Like 99% of everything having to do with health and fitness, you're
going to get opinions all over the place, each one with its
"scientific studies" backing it up.

I've heard that cardio in the morning before breakfast is best for
burning calories. *Just like I've heard that that doesn't matter, that
it doesn't matter whether you do it in the morning or before
breakfast, as far as caloric expenditure is concerned.

Me personally, I've done both and haven't noticed any difference
either way. *I think it's more psychological than physiological.


thanks for your input.

have a great day...
  #3  
Old January 28th, 2008, 09:23 PM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic,rec.running,alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition,misc.fitness.weights
Willow Herself
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,887
Default To eat or not to eat...


"Prisoner at War" wrote in message
...
On Jan 27, 10:59 pm, forest demon wrote:
What are peoples thoughts on eating or aerobics, first thing in the
morning. I've done both in the past, but wanted to hear what people
have to say. in other words, is there a benefit to doing aerobics when
waking, and then eat afterwards....or eat, wait 90 minutes or so and
then do the aerobics.

I'n not into lifting weights or having huge muscle mass. i also like
doing the three hour meal interval; however, not eating within the
first half hour of rising contradicts my question above, i know.

thanks folks.....

-
fd



Like 99% of everything having to do with health and fitness, you're
going to get opinions all over the place, each one with its
"scientific studies" backing it up.

I've heard that cardio in the morning before breakfast is best for
burning calories. Just like I've heard that that doesn't matter, that
it doesn't matter whether you do it in the morning or before
breakfast, as far as caloric expenditure is concerned.

Me personally, I've done both and haven't noticed any difference
either way. I think it's more psychological than physiological.


I do better at Cardio if I can go later, then I'll have an early breakfast,
and do cardio over an hour later.

Since I do have a life, and work most mornings, I do my Cardio first and
then eat because I don't want to do Cardio on a full stomac.

It works too, I'm just a little more sluggish..

)

Will~


  #4  
Old January 29th, 2008, 03:45 AM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
Prisoner at War
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 169
Default To eat or not to eat...

On Jan 28, 4:18 pm, forest demon wrote:


thanks for your input.

have a great day...



Here, check out Columbia University's take on the issue at http://
www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/3644.html.
  #5  
Old January 29th, 2008, 03:48 AM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
Prisoner at War
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 169
Default To eat or not to eat...

On Jan 28, 4:23 pm, "Willow Herself"
wrote:


I do better at Cardio if I can go later, then I'll have an early breakfast,
and do cardio over an hour later.


This is probably best, IMHO, especially if the breakfast is fairly
light (but not just a protein shake, though).

Since I do have a life, and work most mornings, I do my Cardio first and
then eat because I don't want to do Cardio on a full stomac.


I've never had problems with cardio on a full stomach -- though
naturally I won't be able to go nowhere near as fast.

It works too, I'm just a little more sluggish..


Indeed. Some people swear by it, whereas others actually work better
with some fuel in the tank. It would appear, FWIW, that exercising on
an empty stomach does correlate with our evolutionary experience of
hunting first and then feasting....

)

Will~


  #6  
Old January 29th, 2008, 08:11 PM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
Mr. Natural-Health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default To eat or not to eat...

The ONLY technique needed to lose weight: STOP eating!!!!

Just thought that you might want to know.
  #7  
Old February 7th, 2008, 02:37 AM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
6packer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default To eat or not to eat...

Haha, no no dont STOP EATING...actually the best thing to do to lose
weight fast/effectively is to eat about 6 times a day! but VERY small
portions. gets the metabolism going. also cardio such as running and
importantly to work the center of your body...the core...or rather the
abs. i have a blog that could really help if you wanna check it
http://superrippedabs.blogspot.com/ also my preference for doing
cardio in the morning, is to eat a small something with carbs wait
about 45 minutes, and then do my cardio workout...followed by a shower
and a meal. hope that helps!
  #8  
Old February 7th, 2008, 01:47 PM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
Mr. Natural-Health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default To eat or not to eat...

On Feb 6, 9:37 pm, 6packer wrote:
Haha, no no dont STOP EATING...actually the best thing to do to lose
weight fast/effectively is to eat about 6 times a day!


Probably the worst advice ever given.

Just another excuse to end up eating an absolutely huge amount of food
- ALL DAY LONG.

  #9  
Old February 8th, 2008, 06:13 AM posted to misc.fitness.aerobic, rec.running, alt.support.diet,sci.med.nutrition, misc.fitness.weights
6packer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default To eat or not to eat...

On Feb 7, 8:47*am, "Mr. Natural-Health"
wrote:
On Feb 6, 9:37 pm, 6packer wrote:

Haha, no no dont STOP EATING...actually the best thing to do to lose
weight fast/effectively is to eat about 6 times a day!


Probably the worst advice ever given.


Are you kidding? i guess you dont know anything about how the
metabolic process works in your body.
  #10  
Old February 9th, 2008, 04:30 PM posted to rec.running,alt.support.diet,,sci.med.nutrition,misc.fitness.weights
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default To eat or not to eat...

6packer wrote in news:35fc1875-be60-4153-93c2-
:



Are you kidding? i guess you dont know anything about how the
metabolic process works in your body.


Obviously he has no idea how a human mind works either. Not owning one puts
you at a disadvantage.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.