If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
STOP eating and see what happens!
I invite everyone to STOP eating and see what happens!
Do it long enough, and you will end up looking like a holocaust victim. Starvation works every time, guaranteed! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
To eat or not to eat...
On Feb 8, 1:13 am, 6packer wrote:
On Feb 7, 8:47 am, "Mr. Natural-Health" wrote: On Feb 6, 9:37 pm, 6packer wrote: Haha, no no dont STOP EATING...actually the best thing to do to lose weight fast/effectively is to eat about 6 times a day! Probably the worst advice ever given. Are you kidding? i guess you dont know anything about how the metabolic process works in your body. Ha, ... Hah, Ha! I happen to know how FatSos work! Six tiny meals a day. Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Absolutely no way. FatSos just love any excuse to eat more food all day long. Want to loose weight, then try starving for a change. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
STOP eating and see what happens!
On Feb 13, 9:35 am, Fred wrote:
(Mr. Natural-Health) wrote : I invite everyone to STOP eating and see what happens! BREATHARIANISM, INEDIA, NON-EATING (breatharian, inediate, non-eater) This is a state of man (breatharian, inediate, non-eater) characterized (among other things) by the absence of eating, ... Fasting / breatharian was quite popular during the 19th century. A number of individuals managed to publicly starve themselves to death trying to prove that they did not to eat in order to survive. Relatives were passing these nut jobs food during kissing. None of these breatharian freaks were note worthy enough to mention by name. They were were all obviously mentally ill. And, would rather live their miserable existence of a life staying in bed their entire life then doing an honest day's work. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/...n-america.html "1859Charles Darwin publishes his On the Origin of Species, in London England. People in the 19th century would soon become less than convinced that everything about a human being could be explained biologically. The medical profession obsessed with its mechanical materialism from the perspective of the 19th century person would end up attacking far more than just unscientific alternative medicine. Mechanical materialism was a direct attack upon the Christian faith and its notion of a soul as well as an attack upon all Classical Western values. When science attacks alternative medicine, it is really claiming that everything about a human being can be explained by biology. For with biomedicine all Classical Western values such as bravery, loyalty, hard work, and free will are only a matter of molecules, genetics, and the right combination of prescription medication. The public would soon develop a mistrust of the new and rapid ascendance of science which precluded any belief in the ability of a person to rise above carnal needs and desires. The 19th century American public would soon see fasting as proof that people could live through divine grace rather than by the normal laws of nature. Interest in Spiritualism would soon develop as a direct response to mechanical materialistic Darwinism as a form of scientific religion that proclaimed that it could scientifically study the soul." |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
To eat or not to eat...
On Jan 28, 3:10 pm, Prisoner at War wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:59 pm, forest demon wrote: What are peoples thoughts on eating or aerobics, first thing in the morning. I've done both in the past, but wanted to hear what people have to say. in other words, is there a benefit to doing aerobics when waking, and then eat afterwards....or eat, wait 90 minutes or so and then do the aerobics. I'n not into lifting weights or having huge muscle mass. i also like doing the three hour meal interval; however, not eating within the first half hour of rising contradicts my question above, i know. thanks folks..... - fd Like 99% of everything having to do with health and fitness, you're going to get opinions all over the place, each one with its "scientific studies" backing it up. I've heard that cardio in the morning before breakfast is best for burning calories. Just like I've heard that that doesn't matter, that it doesn't matter whether you do it in the morning or before breakfast, as far as caloric expenditure is concerned. Me personally, I've done both and haven't noticed any difference either way. I think it's more psychological than physiological. I believe that both possibilities have pros and cons. It's a subjective issue depending on what you are eating, what you ate the night before, and what your body feels like. You see, by eating before working out, theoreticlly, one has a high possible energy level with the high calories and would be thence able to work harder, translating into a healthier routine. But at the same time, the calories consumed need to be canceled for the workout to be as effective as doing it on an empty stomach. By not eating, your body would be already a bit weak and so as long as you have a high protein recovery meal, it could also translate into the building of muscle. I am doing a science project involving the effects of various exercises on pulse, sugar, mass, and isolated muscular exhaustion, for which I performed all the treatments on an empty stomach. I found that when my sugar levels were relatively low, I felt a bit weaker and less able to operate at top performance. I am not diabetic, but eating gives us energy and sugar defiantly plays a role in short term strength. You also don't want a high sugar level, just an average one. Another thing you may want to consider is compromising the two. Try eating (for lack of a better phrase) a 'half breakfast' before working out and then eat the other half afterwards. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
To eat or not to eat...
N.X. Rodser wrote:
I am doing a science project involving the effects of various exercises on pulse, sugar, mass, and isolated muscular exhaustion, for which I performed all the treatments on an empty stomach. I found that when my sugar levels were relatively low, I felt a bit weaker and less able to operate at top performance. I am not diabetic, but eating gives us energy and sugar defiantly plays a role in short term strength. You also don't want a high sugar level, just an average one. Another thing you may want to consider is compromising the two. Try eating (for lack of a better phrase) a 'half breakfast' before working out and then eat the other half afterwards. Read Gary Taubes new book "Good Calories, Bad Calories". The primary hypothesis that appears to be very strong is that carbs drive insulin which drives calories to fat cells. Decrease your carb intake and your body fat will decrease, provided calories stay reasonable and exercise is decent volume. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
To eat or not to eat...
On Jan 28, 3:10*pm, Prisoner at War wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:59 pm, forest demon wrote: What are peoples thoughts on eating or aerobics, first thing in the morning. *I've done both in the past, but wanted to hear what people have to say. in other words, is there a benefit to doing aerobics when waking, and then eat afterwards....or eat, wait 90 minutes or so and then do the aerobics. I'n not into lifting weights or having huge muscle mass. i also like doing the three hour meal interval; however, not eating within the first half hour of rising contradicts my question above, i know. thanks folks..... - fd Like 99% of everything having to do with health and fitness, you're going to get opinions all over the place, each one with its "scientific studies" backing it up. I've heard that cardio in the morning before breakfast is best for burning calories. *Just like I've heard that that doesn't matter, that it doesn't matter whether you do it in the morning or before breakfast, as far as caloric expenditure is concerned. Me personally, I've done both and haven't noticed any difference either way. *I think it's more psychological than physiological. Nathan Pritikin once wrote that one should eat at least a little something before exercise because otherwise, on a completely empty stomach, free fatty acids would be thrown into the blood. I have no comment on this other than to say I read it in one of his books. Dolores |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|