If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
I have lost 16.6 lbs in the last 7 weeks and only changed 1 meal a
day. new products from a new company in Carlsbad CA www.EatCheat.com has all the info its free to sign up too |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:13:45 -0500, MU wrote
(in article ): On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:50:10 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I have lost 16.6 lbs in the last 7 weeks and only changed 1 meal a day. If you were eating 2.75 pounds of food and dropped one meal that weighed one pound, you would achieve the same results. Except that you would not have lost weight so drastically and placed yourself in an inevitable rebound, return to or past original weight, for which you are now most assuredly doomed. If you continue eating as on the diet, your weight will not rebound. This is generally true with any diet which results in a weight loss. The reason the vast majority do not maintain their weight loss is that they go back to their old eating habits. Wonder if two pounds of celery or two pounds of peanut butter would give the same weight loss in a short overweight female and a 6 feet 4 inch overweight man. Also in some who leads a sedentary life versus someone doing a lot of physical activity at work and home. Wonder if an athlete who participates in the Ironman (swimming, bicycling and running) in Hawaii can do that on a 2 pound diet ..... most of these athletes are thin and would expect they eat a lot more than Chung's "2 PD" All these simple questions without any answer. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.support.diet.low-carb.]
On 2009-04-29, MU wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:50:10 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I have lost 16.6 lbs in the last 7 weeks and only changed 1 meal a day. If you were eating 2.75 pounds of food and dropped one meal that weighed one pound, you would achieve the same results. Except that you would not ``Same results, except not.'' Bull**** equivocation, combined with blind guessing. have lost weight so drastically and placed yourself in an inevitable rebound, return to or past original weight, for which you are now most assuredly doomed. Pitiful imbecile, how do you know 16.6 pounds is drastic? It depends on the total adiposity. For someone carrying 20 pounds of body fat, it would be drastic (pretty much regardless of how long it took, really). For someone carrying 70 pounds, it wouldn't be drastic to lose 16.6 pounds in 7 weeks. There is empirical evidence that maximum amount of body fat that can be shed by means of a dietary deficit, without loss of lean mass (which qualifies as a good definition of non-drastic loss) is a fraction of the total adiposity. This fraction is about 0.8% per day, give or take. (Source: this can be derived from the results stated in the paper ``A limit on the energy transfer rate from the human fat store in hypophagia''). From this we can easily calculate the percentage over 49 days: 1 - (1 - .008)^49 = 0.325 (Note: ^ represents exponentiation). I.e. over 7 weeks, you can safely lose about 33% of your body fat. If you are carrying 48 pounds of it, then this is 16. The more fat you have in excess of 48 pounds, the easier and safer it is to lose 16 pounds over 7 weeks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
On Apr 29, 5:44*pm, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.support.diet.low-carb.] On 2009-04-29, MU wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:50:10 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I have lost 16.6 lbs in the last 7 weeks and only changed 1 meal a day. If you were eating 2.75 pounds of food and dropped one meal that weighed one pound, you would achieve the same results. Except that you would not ``Same results, except not.'' Bull**** equivocation, combined with blind guessing. have lost weight so drastically and placed yourself in an inevitable rebound, return to or past original weight, for which you are now most assuredly doomed. Pitiful imbecile, how do you know 16.6 pounds is drastic? It depends on the total adiposity. For someone carrying 20 pounds of body fat, it would be drastic (pretty much regardless of how long it took, really). For someone carrying 70 pounds, it wouldn't be drastic to lose 16.6 pounds in 7 weeks. There is empirical evidence that maximum amount of body fat that can be shed by means of a dietary deficit, without loss of lean mass (which qualifies as a good definition of non-drastic loss) is a fraction of the total adiposity. This fraction is about 0.8% per day, give or take. (Source: this can be derived from the results stated in the paper ``A limit on the energy transfer rate from the human fat store in hypophagia''). From this we can easily calculate the percentage over 49 days: * 1 - (1 - .008)^49 = 0.325 * (Note: ^ represents exponentiation). I.e. over 7 weeks, you can safely lose about 33% of your body fat. If you are carrying 48 pounds of it, then this is 16. The more fat you have in excess of 48 pounds, the easier and safer it is to lose 16 pounds over 7 weeks. Checkout this website http://www.smash-marketing.com/diet.htm for some non-exercise, non-diet tips to losing weight |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:44:31 -0500, MM wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:13:45 -0500, MU wrote (in article ): On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:50:10 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I have lost 16.6 lbs in the last 7 weeks and only changed 1 meal a day. If you were eating 2.75 pounds of food and dropped one meal that weighed one pound, you would achieve the same results. Except that you would not have lost weight so drastically and placed yourself in an inevitable rebound, return to or past original weight, for which you are now most assuredly doomed. If you continue eating as on the diet, your weight will not rebound. This is generally true with any diet which results in a weight loss. Correct. The problem is that so few, less than 3% over time remain on the diet. Rebound is practically inevitable by conclusion. The reason the vast majority do not maintain their weight loss is that they go back to their old eating habits. See above. Wonder if two pounds of celery or two pounds of peanut butter would give the same weight loss in a short overweight female and a 6 feet 4 inch overweight man. Also in some who leads a sedentary life versus someone doing a lot of physical activity at work and home. Wonder if an athlete who participates in the Ironman (swimming, bicycling and running) in Hawaii can do that on a 2 pound diet ..... most of these athletes are thin and would expect they eat a lot more than Chung's "2 PD" All these simple questions without any answer. Answers are simple. No one gains weight, everyone reaches optimal weight by eating 2PD or less. Considering that I have extensive experience with training and athletes in traning, and common folk, I speak from those realities. -- http://tinyurl.com/5gt7 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:44:49 +0000 (UTC), Kaz Kylheku wrote:
If you were eating 2.75 pounds of food and dropped one meal that weighed one pound, you would achieve the same results. Except that you would not ``Same results, except not.'' Bull**** equivocation, combined with blind guessing. Goodbye, little child. *plonk* -- http://tinyurl.com/5gt7 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:15:15 -0500, MU wrote
(in article ): Answers are simple. No one gains weight, everyone reaches optimal weight by eating 2PD or less. Considering that I have extensive experience with training and athletes in traning, and common folk, I speak from those realities. Hmmm ..... so will two identical twins one eating 2PD of peanut butter and the other eating 2PD of celery result in the same weight of the two even though there is a big difference of calories consumed ..... they both have the same activity level so the only variable is the what they eat .... would seem that the one eating two pounds of peanut butter which has more calories than the two pounds of celery would end up with a much higher weight. Perhaps you could inform us of just what is your "extensive experience" ? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:32:38 -0500, MM wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:15:15 -0500, MU wrote (in article ): Answers are simple. No one gains weight, everyone reaches optimal weight by eating 2PD or less. Considering that I have extensive experience with training and athletes in traning, and common folk, I speak from those realities. Hmmm ..... so will two identical twins one eating 2PD of peanut butter and the other eating 2PD of celery result in the same weight of the two even though there is a big difference of calories consumed ..... they both have the same activity level so the only variable is the what they eat .... would seem that the one eating two pounds of peanut butter which has more calories than the two pounds of celery would end up with a much higher weight. Perhaps you could inform us of just what is your "extensive experience" ? Asked and answered the first paragraph, Mr. Disingenuous. As to "extensive experience", Google is your multiple friend. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
My Progress
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:45:48 -0500, MU wrote
(in article ): On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:32:38 -0500, MM wrote: On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:15:15 -0500, MU wrote (in article ): Answers are simple. No one gains weight, everyone reaches optimal weight by eating 2PD or less. Considering that I have extensive experience with training and athletes in traning, and common folk, I speak from those realities. Hmmm ..... so will two identical twins one eating 2PD of peanut butter and the other eating 2PD of celery result in the same weight of the two even though there is a big difference of calories consumed ..... they both have the same activity level so the only variable is the what they eat .... would seem that the one eating two pounds of peanut butter which has more calories than the two pounds of celery would end up with a much higher weight. Perhaps you could inform us of just what is your "extensive experience" ? Asked and answered the first paragraph, Mr. Disingenuous. As to "extensive experience", Google is your multiple friend. Still waiting to hear if the calories of the two pounds of food eaten if one follows Chung's 2PD make any difference in a person's final weight. My above extreme example was a way to try and get that answered. Will see if the question is answered if calories make any difference in a person's final weight if eats two pounds of food a day. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My progress!! Can anyone tell? | wilson | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 6 | May 6th, 2004 08:43 PM |
progress | ray miller | Weightwatchers | 12 | March 29th, 2004 04:42 AM |
Progress so far | onoma | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 6 | March 19th, 2004 05:25 AM |
My Progress | Amanda | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 1 | February 7th, 2004 11:24 PM |
Progress! | **Debby** | General Discussion | 9 | October 9th, 2003 02:43 AM |