Carbohydrates offer some help in muscle protein synthesis, but not enough for the desired effect

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:46:15 -0600, Lyle McDonald
wrote:

Keith Hobman wrote:

In article ,
snipping so DRS won't whine

Unnerstand the distinction?


Sure.

Like the Barney in Good Will Hunting.

here's an example of a time it happened to me.

me me me me me me me etc

For goodness sake McD you are such a self-centred boring *******!!

[...]

"John HUDSON" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:46:15 -0600, Lyle McDonald
wrote:

Keith Hobman wrote:

In article ,
snipping so DRS won't whine

Unnerstand the distinction?


Sure.

Like the Barney in Good Will Hunting.

here's an example of a time it happened to me.

me me me me me me me etc

For goodness sake McD you are such a self-centred boring *******!!

(just before I killfile you) here is quote from Lyle
"now let's stop talking about me . . let's talk about you . . . now, what do
you think of me?"

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:02:30 GMT, "David"
wrote:


"John HUDSON" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:46:15 -0600, Lyle McDonald
wrote:

Keith Hobman wrote:

In article ,
snipping so DRS won't whine

Unnerstand the distinction?


Sure.

Like the Barney in Good Will Hunting.

here's an example of a time it happened to me.

me me me me me me me etc

For goodness sake McD you are such a self-centred boring *******!!

(just before I killfile you) here is quote from Lyle
"now let's stop talking about me . . let's talk about you . . . now, what do
you think of me?"

That sums up the heap of neuroses known as McD very well! ;o)

"Lyle McDonald" wrote in message
...
DRS wrote:

Lyle McDonald wrote in message


[...]


You can killfile me just as easily as anybody else cn killfile me.
I have no obligation to you or anyone to post in any way that I don't
like.

If you don't like it, killfile me and don't read me.

BTW, as someone pointed out to me a while back, there is humorous
irony
in the fact that:

a. the people who like what I have to say read me
b. the people who don't like it read me more

If you truly didn't like me, or my posting style, or whatever, you'd
killfile me and be done with it. Instead you carefully read every
post
I make just so you can bitch.

Curious, isn't it?


It's not half as curious as your lack of logic for someone who claims to
be
so smart. First of all, you do assume an obligation when you
participate in
a communal forum such as this. If nothing else, a truly intelligent
person
would take care over their form

How so?
I'm neither paying nor being paid, I and everyone else here choose to do
so by our own volition. I signed no paper stating a certain set of
rules was to be followed and no agreement. I an under no obligation to
anyone.

atting if only out of self-interest, even
though the proper reason would be out of consideration for others, but
you
and a fair number of other people in here clearly aren't even that
smart.

It's got nothing to do with smarts: we don't give a **** about others.

You have just as much an obligation in here to do the right thing by
others
as you do elsewhere.

No I don't and you're repeating that doesn't change that.

I have the same freedom of speech as you and everone else here does.

That some whiny little bitch doesn't LIKE it doesn't change anything.

NOW, if I were on a forum where I had clicked on an 'agree to follow
such and such rules' thing and I wasn't following them, you'd have a
point. As usual, you're just making it up as you go along.

And, again, if you do'nt like how I play, you can always killfile me.

You remind me of the dip****s who always complain about folks Howard
Stern, yet continue to listen to him continually. You have all the
control in this matter to not read my posts, nobody is forcing you.

By your ****ed up logic, I can just as easily argue that in CHOOSING to
read my postts you are OBLIGATING yourself to deal with the
consequences. Except that I'm right and your moronic bull**** about how

Lyle - you have the argument here won! I could not have said it better and
simpler. Thanks. Perhaps the IDIOT DRS will listen for ONCE and shut the
**** up because he is WRONG.

my choice to interact in a free forum somehow obligates me to act in a
certain way is just the rantings of a delusional troll ****wit.

Face it, you just want an excuse to white and bitch and moan and I'm as
good a stimulus for that as anyone else. If it wasn't me, you'd be
whining about something else and we all know it. Just like the majority
of other pussies on the planet. They'd rather whine than do anything
real (doing anything real means killfiling me in this case so you don't
have to read my posts). But you wo'nt do that, will you.

You'd rather bitch and whine and moan than do anything about the
problem. I suggest you go to one of the alt.support.groups.

You and everybody else
who does it would benefit if you formatted properly as your posts would
be
easier to read and you'd have a better chance of getting across what you
want to say but you lot seem more intent of spewing out words for the
sake
of it than communicating efficiently.

Perhaps. Or maybe I don't care. Or maybe I do it deliberately to ****
you off. Or maybe all three. You'll never know will you.

But you'll continue to read me and respond and bitch and whine won't you?

Lyle

AlphaOmega2004 wrote:

"Lyle McDonald" wrote in message
...

DRS wrote:


Lyle McDonald wrote in message


[...]



You can killfile me just as easily as anybody else cn killfile me.
I have no obligation to you or anyone to post in any way that I don't
like.

If you don't like it, killfile me and don't read me.

BTW, as someone pointed out to me a while back, there is humorous
irony
in the fact that:

a. the people who like what I have to say read me
b. the people who don't like it read me more

If you truly didn't like me, or my posting style, or whatever, you'd
killfile me and be done with it. Instead you carefully read every
post
I make just so you can bitch.

Curious, isn't it?


It's not half as curious as your lack of logic for someone who claims to

be

so smart. First of all, you do assume an obligation when you

participate in

a communal forum such as this. If nothing else, a truly intelligent

person

would take care over their form

How so?
I'm neither paying nor being paid, I and everyone else here choose to do
so by our own volition. I signed no paper stating a certain set of
rules was to be followed and no agreement. I an under no obligation to
anyone.


atting if only out of self-interest, even
though the proper reason would be out of consideration for others, but

you

and a fair number of other people in here clearly aren't even that

smart.

It's got nothing to do with smarts: we don't give a **** about others.


You have just as much an obligation in here to do the right thing by

others

as you do elsewhere.

No I don't and you're repeating that doesn't change that.

I have the same freedom of speech as you and everone else here does.

That some whiny little bitch doesn't LIKE it doesn't change anything.

NOW, if I were on a forum where I had clicked on an 'agree to follow
such and such rules' thing and I wasn't following them, you'd have a
point. As usual, you're just making it up as you go along.

And, again, if you do'nt like how I play, you can always killfile me.

You remind me of the dip****s who always complain about folks Howard
Stern, yet continue to listen to him continually. You have all the
control in this matter to not read my posts, nobody is forcing you.

By your ****ed up logic, I can just as easily argue that in CHOOSING to
read my postts you are OBLIGATING yourself to deal with the
consequences. Except that I'm right and your moronic bull**** about how


Lyle - you have the argument here won! I could not have said it better and
simpler. Thanks. Perhaps the IDIOT DRS will listen for ONCE and shut the
**** up because he is WRONG.

Yeah, but since when has that ever stopped him?

But my point is made: knowing how I post and how I write, any time he
CHOOSES to read my post, he is obligating myself to whatever is in
there. He's in no position to bitch except for the fact that he's a
whiny little pussy who appears to get off on it.

Which is why I brought up the Howard Stern example. The people who
bitch about him (yet listen to him constantly) know what he's like, know
what he's going to say. By CHOOSING to listen to him, they are
obligating himself to listen to what he has to say. They are in no
position to bitch about it for that very reason. Except for the fact
that they are whiny little pussies who appear to get off on it.

Nobody is forcing DRS to read me or anybody else. By choosing of his
own free will to do so, it's his own problem to deal with the
consequences. If he doesn't like it, he shouldn't read it, end of story.

Lyle

"John HUDSON" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:02:30 GMT, "David"
wrote:


"John HUDSON" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:46:15 -0600, Lyle McDonald
wrote:

Keith Hobman wrote:

In article ,
snipping so DRS won't whine

Unnerstand the distinction?


Sure.

Like the Barney in Good Will Hunting.

here's an example of a time it happened to me.

me me me me me me me etc

For goodness sake McD you are such a self-centred boring *******!!

(just before I killfile you) here is quote from Lyle
"now let's stop talking about me . . let's talk about you . . . now, what
do
you think of me?"

That sums up the heap of neuroses known as McD very well! ;o)

I think they have a section on Lyle now as a case study in Psych 101 - under
the heading "Rare Egocentric Syndrome"

"Lyle McDonald" wrote in message
...
Keith Hobman wrote:

In article ,
snipping so DRS won't whine

Unnerstand the distinction?


Sure.

Like the Barney in Good Will Hunting.

here's an example of a time it happened to me.

I'm in grad school, in advanced exercise physiology. I took issue with
a comment my teacher had made about some enzyme or another (I think I
thought it was fructose-6-phospate and he thought it was something
else). I tell him I'll look it up. So at the next week of class he asks
me if I looked it up. I hadn't and told him.

He said "That means you know you're wrong."

Damn if he wasn't 100% correct and if he didn't shut me down completely.
And deservedly so.

Now, a crybaby pussy would have gotten his panties all twisted about
this. But since I'm not a crybaby pussy, I learned a valuable lesson:
don't shoot your ****ing mouth off about someting if you're not sure
you're right.

At a later date, a different issue had come up, basically my moron
classmates were 100% wrong about something that they should have learned
in undergrad exercise physiology (it had to do with how muscle grows:
whether it's adding sarcomeres in series or in parallel and they were
ALL wrong about it and I was right). So something else came up in class
and they thought they had me, kept asking the professor a badly worded
question. I knew exactly where they were going but he couldn't get it.

I asked him if I could explain. He said "ARe you sure you're right?"

Yes, give me the chalk.

I lectured the class for 10 minutes, was clearly right.

And that's a big part of why all my classmates hated me.

Because, like the crybaby pussies they all apparently were, they choose
to get all twitty and intimidated by the fact that I had had 10+ years
of time in the field to improve my knowledge base compared to theirs
(this isn't including the fact that some seemed totally clueless about
stuff they should have learned in undergrad anyhow; the difference
between ignorance and stupidity again).

Now, when I'm in that situation, I'll pick that person's brain about it.
If they know more than me about something, I'll use them to my
advantage and get their knowledge. These guys had too much ego for
that, decided to just shun me. Whatever, I wasn't there to make friends
and didnt' care if they liked me or not so their bull**** was of no
concern to me.

unfortunately I was there to learn and I wasn't doing that either....

so what were you doing then? why weren't you learning? were you always
socially challenged?

On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:26:58 GMT, "David"
wrote:


"John HUDSON" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:02:30 GMT, "David"
wrote:


"John HUDSON" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:46:15 -0600, Lyle McDonald
wrote:

Keith Hobman wrote:

In article ,
snipping so DRS won't whine

Unnerstand the distinction?


Sure.

Like the Barney in Good Will Hunting.

here's an example of a time it happened to me.

me me me me me me me etc

For goodness sake McD you are such a self-centred boring *******!!

(just before I killfile you) here is quote from Lyle
"now let's stop talking about me . . let's talk about you . . . now, what
do
you think of me?"

That sums up the heap of neuroses known as McD very well! ;o)

I think they have a section on Lyle now as a case study in Psych 101 - under
the heading "Rare Egocentric Syndrome"

I believe he has a doctorate in RES!

"John HUDSON" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:26:58 GMT, "David"
wrote:


"John HUDSON" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:02:30 GMT, "David"
wrote:


[snipped so DRS won't say I'm selfish]

That sums up the heap of neuroses known as McD very well! ;o)

I think they have a section on Lyle now as a case study in Psych 101 -
under
the heading "Rare Egocentric Syndrome"

I believe he has a doctorate in RES!

majored in "monkey fetishes and other perversions" - got a near perfect
score from what I hear

Lyle McDonald wrote in message


[...]

I have the same freedom of speech as you and everone else here does.

Freedom is not licence, ****tard.

--

"I'm proud that I live in a country where witnessing two hours of bloody,
barbarous torture in gloating detail is considered indicia of religious
piety, whereas a mere second gazing upon a woman's breast is cause for
outraged apoplexy."
Betty Bowers, http://www.bettybowers.com/melgibsonpassion.html