If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........
"Aspartame is OK!!!!!"
Would you like to know who funded the study? Answer: Monsanto. OK, so who is Monsanto? Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto. You don't mean....... Yes. But that would mean that....... Yes. Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could. Joe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........
Why are you so angry and condescending in your posts? The post is about
aspartame of all things. Why not post information that you think is relevant and let people make their own decisions? j "Joe" joseph@here wrote in message ... "Aspartame is OK!!!!!" Would you like to know who funded the study? Answer: Monsanto. OK, so who is Monsanto? Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto. You don't mean....... Yes. But that would mean that....... Yes. Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could. Joe |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 14:44:36 -0600, "Julianne"
wrote: Why are you so angry and condescending in your posts? I am angry and condescending towards those who have promoted Aspartame who know the facts, who know the science, and who know the consequences; yet who have LIED and SPINNED it away or simply turned away their heads in silence. Given that, one would think that I'd have every right to be angry and condescending towards them. The post is about aspartame of all things. Why not post information that you think is relevant So Julianne, let me understand you - you're saying it's not relevant to educate people looking for help in making decisions regarding consumption of, or who are simply interested in, certain artificial sweetners. Or are you implying that discussion of artificial sweetners has no place in discussion of diet. and let people make their own decisions? The facts are plain for anyone to see, Julianne. Aspartame, the composition of which is well-documented, and how it is processed upon consumption being well-documented, was "studied" in a "major" project which clearly involved a crucial conflict of interest. I think that is quite important in consideration of the facts behind a major artificial sweetner. Unless, perhaps, you happen to be the CEO of Monsanto. Joe j "Joe" joseph@here wrote in message .. . "Aspartame is OK!!!!!" Would you like to know who funded the study? Answer: Monsanto. OK, so who is Monsanto? Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto. You don't mean....... Yes. But that would mean that....... Yes. Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could. Joe |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........
"Joe" joseph@here wrote in message ... On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 14:44:36 -0600, "Julianne" wrote: Why are you so angry and condescending in your posts? I am angry and condescending towards those who have promoted Aspartame who know the facts, who know the science, and who know the consequences; yet who have LIED and SPINNED it away or simply turned away their heads in silence. Given that, one would think that I'd have every right to be angry and condescending towards them. The post is about aspartame of all things. Why not post information that you think is relevant So Julianne, let me understand you - you're saying it's not relevant to educate people looking for help in making decisions regarding consumption of, or who are simply interested in, certain artificial sweetners. Or are you implying that discussion of artificial sweetners has no place in discussion of diet. and let people make their own decisions? The facts are plain for anyone to see, Julianne. Aspartame, the composition of which is well-documented, and how it is processed upon consumption being well-documented, was "studied" in a "major" project which clearly involved a crucial conflict of interest. I think that is quite important in consideration of the facts behind a major artificial sweetner. If the facts are plain to see then why promote them with hateful comments like 'Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could'? I am neither a boy or a girl and neither are most of the regulars here. I think I speak for us all when I say that none of us have any desire that you should eat aspertame. But when the conflict of interest question comes up, it always gets me thinking...... Suppose I designed a super duper new food product or drug and wanted it to be marketed. Would it be someone else's responsibility to fund the studies? If so, whose responsibility would it be? j Unless, perhaps, you happen to be the CEO of Monsanto. Joe j "Joe" joseph@here wrote in message .. . "Aspartame is OK!!!!!" Would you like to know who funded the study? Answer: Monsanto. OK, so who is Monsanto? Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto. You don't mean....... Yes. But that would mean that....... Yes. Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could. Joe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sugar Free Gum W/Out Aspartame??? | Perple Glow | General Discussion | 3 | September 27th, 2003 03:11 PM |