A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 7th, 2003, 04:24 AM
Joe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........

"Aspartame is OK!!!!!"

Would you like to know who funded the study?

Answer: Monsanto.

OK, so who is Monsanto?

Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto.

You don't mean.......

Yes.

But that would mean that.......

Yes.

Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could.

Joe
  #2  
Old November 7th, 2003, 08:44 PM
Julianne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........

Why are you so angry and condescending in your posts? The post is about
aspartame of all things. Why not post information that you think is
relevant and let people make their own decisions?

j
"Joe" joseph@here wrote in message
...
"Aspartame is OK!!!!!"

Would you like to know who funded the study?

Answer: Monsanto.

OK, so who is Monsanto?

Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto.

You don't mean.......

Yes.

But that would mean that.......

Yes.

Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could.

Joe



  #3  
Old November 7th, 2003, 10:46 PM
Joe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 14:44:36 -0600, "Julianne"
wrote:

Why are you so angry and condescending in your posts?


I am angry and condescending towards those who have promoted Aspartame
who know the facts, who know the science, and who know the
consequences; yet who have LIED and SPINNED it away or simply turned
away their heads in silence.

Given that, one would think that I'd have every right to be angry and
condescending towards them.



The post is about
aspartame of all things. Why not post information that you think is
relevant


So Julianne, let me understand you - you're saying it's not relevant
to educate people looking for help in making decisions regarding
consumption of, or who are simply interested in, certain artificial
sweetners. Or are you implying that discussion of artificial
sweetners has no place in discussion of diet.


and let people make their own decisions?


The facts are plain for anyone to see, Julianne. Aspartame, the
composition of which is well-documented, and how it is processed upon
consumption being well-documented, was "studied" in a "major" project
which clearly involved a crucial conflict of interest. I think that
is quite important in consideration of the facts behind a major
artificial sweetner.

Unless, perhaps, you happen to be the CEO of Monsanto.

Joe


j
"Joe" joseph@here wrote in message
.. .
"Aspartame is OK!!!!!"

Would you like to know who funded the study?

Answer: Monsanto.

OK, so who is Monsanto?

Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto.

You don't mean.......

Yes.

But that would mean that.......

Yes.

Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could.

Joe



  #4  
Old November 8th, 2003, 01:52 AM
Julianne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A "Major" Test On Aspartame Showed That..........


"Joe" joseph@here wrote in message
...
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 14:44:36 -0600, "Julianne"
wrote:

Why are you so angry and condescending in your posts?


I am angry and condescending towards those who have promoted Aspartame
who know the facts, who know the science, and who know the
consequences; yet who have LIED and SPINNED it away or simply turned
away their heads in silence.

Given that, one would think that I'd have every right to be angry and
condescending towards them.



The post is about
aspartame of all things. Why not post information that you think is
relevant


So Julianne, let me understand you - you're saying it's not relevant
to educate people looking for help in making decisions regarding
consumption of, or who are simply interested in, certain artificial
sweetners. Or are you implying that discussion of artificial
sweetners has no place in discussion of diet.


and let people make their own decisions?


The facts are plain for anyone to see, Julianne. Aspartame, the
composition of which is well-documented, and how it is processed upon
consumption being well-documented, was "studied" in a "major" project
which clearly involved a crucial conflict of interest. I think that
is quite important in consideration of the facts behind a major
artificial sweetner.


If the facts are plain to see then why promote them with hateful comments
like 'Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you
could'? I am neither a boy or a girl and neither are most of the regulars
here. I think I speak for us all when I say that none of us have any desire
that you should eat aspertame.

But when the conflict of interest question comes up, it always gets me
thinking...... Suppose I designed a super duper new food product or drug
and wanted it to be marketed. Would it be someone else's responsibility to
fund the studies? If so, whose responsibility would it be?

j


Unless, perhaps, you happen to be the CEO of Monsanto.

Joe


j
"Joe" joseph@here wrote in message
.. .
"Aspartame is OK!!!!!"

Would you like to know who funded the study?

Answer: Monsanto.

OK, so who is Monsanto?

Answer: Aspartame was created and marketed by Monsanto.

You don't mean.......

Yes.

But that would mean that.......

Yes.

Can you say, "Conflict of interest" boys and girls? I knew you could.

Joe





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sugar Free Gum W/Out Aspartame??? Perple Glow General Discussion 3 September 27th, 2003 03:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.