If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Slowly, ever so slowly, the worm turns.
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:32:59 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: [...] You know when you'll read Duesberg's book? When one day, say, while applying for a new life insurance policy, you're asked to take a blood test, and then it comes back HIV+. *Then you'll read the book. Not much chance of that. You better hope so. Those that believe the AIDS denialist nonsense supported by the book, how do they fare? I guess no one is allowed to die today, unless it's from "AIDS complications." Sheesh. Did you watch the film I linked to about the many people who are still alive today after testing positive for HIV, but have refused AIDS drugs? Some for over 26 years? I didn't think so. -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Slowly, ever so slowly, the worm turns.
James Warren wrote:
Doug Freyburger wrote: James Warren wrote: Doug Freyburger wrote: Exactly - The big fat lie. It might merely be a mistake. Early on it would have been a mistake. Then the evidence started piling up and the entrenchment progresssed. Or a big fat goof up. Validly called a goof up from around 1970 until around 1980. By then the evidence that low fat is harmful at least as often as beneficial had alreadu built up. It's been a clear cut lie for a very long time. Advocates of fallen theories tend to adhere to them for life so we're going to have those low fat advocates out there spewing their lies for quite some time now. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Slowly, ever so slowly, the worm turns.
On 5/24/2012 1:09 PM, Doug Freyburger wrote:
James Warren wrote: Doug Freyburger wrote: James Warren wrote: Doug Freyburger wrote: Exactly - The big fat lie. It might merely be a mistake. Early on it would have been a mistake. Then the evidence started piling up and the entrenchment progresssed. Or a big fat goof up. Validly called a goof up from around 1970 until around 1980. By then the evidence that low fat is harmful at least as often as beneficial had alreadu built up. Doubts were beginning to appear but not solid evidence against Low Fat. It's been a clear cut lie for a very long time. Advocates of fallen theories tend to adhere to them for life so we're going to have those low fat advocates out there spewing their lies for quite some time now. It has not been so clear as to remove all doubt. There is still the unresolved issue of whether or not the established risk factors are really risk factors. Until this is resolved most do not want to chance doing things to risk worsening their lipid profiles. In fact, all diets tested compare themselves to how well they affect lipid profiles, tacitly assuming that lipid profiles are valid risk markers. As long as it can be shown that Low Fat diets lower LDL cholesterol then changing it will be difficult. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Slowly, ever so slowly, the worm turns.
On May 24, 11:54*am, Dogman wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:32:59 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: [...] You know when you'll read Duesberg's book? When one day, say, while applying for a new life insurance policy, you're asked to take a blood test, and then it comes back HIV+. *Then you'll read the book. Not much chance of that. You better hope so. Those that believe the AIDS denialist nonsense supported by the book, how do they fare? I guess no one is allowed to die today, unless it's from "AIDS complications." Sheesh. The point is those denialist chose to treat their own AIDS per the suggestions of denialists like you, eg with diet and sleep instead of HIv druges. And they are dead. The survival rate today for those on HIV drugs is excellent. Where is the study showing that approach works? Hmmm? Montagnier claims HIV can be eliminated from the body of those infected via diet, sanitation and "oxidative stress relief". Where is his study? Where are his patients? On the other hand, we do have numerous studies that show the current HIV drug protocol works. You can see it directly in the drastically reduced death rates from AIDS when those drugs are used. Now that's real science. Did you watch the film I linked to about the many people who are still alive today after testing positive for HIV, but have refused AIDS drugs? Some for over 26 years? Which proves nothing, because once infected with HIV the time it takes to develop full blown AIDS can vary from a few years to decades. A small percentage may not developed AIDS after 26 years. It's possible some very small percentage may never develop the full blown disease. So what? It proves absolutely nothing about HIV not being the cause of AIDS. There are other diseases caused by viruses where the long term outcome varies, hepatitis being one example. It's just another example of denialists attempting to confuse people with typical denialist, weird conspiracy theory type tactics. Ignore the mountains of evidence and focus on the margins. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Slowly, ever so slowly, the worm turns.
On May 24, 1:28*pm, James Warren wrote:
On 5/24/2012 1:09 PM, Doug Freyburger wrote: James Warren wrote: Doug Freyburger wrote: James Warren wrote: Doug Freyburger wrote: Exactly - The big fat lie. It might merely be a mistake. Early on it would have been a mistake. *Then the evidence started piling up and the entrenchment progresssed. Or a big fat goof up. Validly called a goof up from around 1970 until around 1980. *By then the evidence that low fat is harmful at least as often as beneficial had alreadu built up. Doubts were beginning to appear but not solid evidence against Low Fat. It's been a clear cut lie for a very long time. *Advocates of fallen theories tend to adhere to them for life so we're going to have those low fat advocates out there spewing their lies for quite some time now. It has not been so clear as to remove all doubt. There is still the unresolved issue of whether or not the established risk factors are really risk factors. Until this is resolved most do not want to chance doing things to risk worsening their lipid profiles. In fact, all diets tested compare themselves to how well they affect lipid profiles, tacitly assuming that lipid profiles are valid risk markers. As long as it can be shown that Low Fat diets lower LDL cholesterol then changing it will be difficult.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - To believe it's all a deliberate lie you'd have to believe that the vast majority of the medical establishment, researchers, scientists, etc are all evil. I agree with you here James. I think many of them are wrong too, but it's not a deliberate lie. How would one explain this vast conspiracy, with everyone from ADA, NIH to your local doctors, nutritionists, university professors, all being in on it? The truth is that for the foreseable future there is always going to be data on diet that can be interpreted in different ways. Those that think the whole medical community is lying, should call a hippie the next time they need treatment or a drug. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Slowly, ever so slowly, the worm turns.
On Fri, 25 May 2012 07:19:05 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: [...] The point is those denialist chose to treat their own AIDS Yes, they do: http://www.bluebell.de/englisch -- Dogman "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything" - Richard Feynman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eating slowly | jjrb230 via WeightAdviser.com | General Discussion | 4 | August 21st, 2006 06:30 PM |
Slowly, slowly | Alan | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 13 | October 26th, 2005 02:49 PM |
Shrinking slowly! | sandy | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | October 9th, 2004 08:00 PM |
Is low-carbing successful if you go slowly?? | wilson | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 14 | March 9th, 2004 12:49 AM |
changing slowly | Susan Jones-Anderson | General Discussion | 16 | October 3rd, 2003 01:01 AM |