A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Calories after cooking



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 30th, 2007, 11:08 AM posted to alt.support.diet
em
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 519
Default Calories after cooking

I bought some lf ground pork at the grocery store. It was pretty good for
pork, I thought: 4% fat, 1g of sat fat per 4oz serving.

Anyway, there was nutrition information on the back of the package that said
180 calories per 4oz serving, etc. But the nutrition information was for the
raw meat.

Of course, there's the "added water" that evaporates during the cooking
process, and I'm guessing that the caloric density of the food changes when
this happens. Some of the fat drains out of the meat, too.

(All of the above also goes for ground turkey.)

In regards to preparation, I fried the meat along with a tiny spritz of
spray oil.

How do I handle this in terms of determining calories? Are the changes
insignificant?

TIA,

  #2  
Old June 30th, 2007, 11:43 AM posted to alt.support.diet
Zilbandy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Calories after cooking

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:08:55 -0700, "em" wrote:

I bought some lf ground pork at the grocery store. It was pretty good for
pork, I thought: 4% fat, 1g of sat fat per 4oz serving.

Anyway, there was nutrition information on the back of the package that said
180 calories per 4oz serving, etc. But the nutrition information was for the
raw meat.

Of course, there's the "added water" that evaporates during the cooking
process, and I'm guessing that the caloric density of the food changes when
this happens. Some of the fat drains out of the meat, too.

(All of the above also goes for ground turkey.)

In regards to preparation, I fried the meat along with a tiny spritz of
spray oil.

How do I handle this in terms of determining calories? Are the changes
insignificant?


I figure 60 calories per ounce for "trimmed pork steak". Here's a link
that has helped me to lose 160 pounds so far:
http://www.calorieking.com/foods/

--
Zilbandy (602/440/???)
  #3  
Old June 30th, 2007, 11:57 AM posted to alt.support.diet
Zilbandy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Calories after cooking

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:43:30 -0700, Zilbandy
wrote:

I figure 60 calories per ounce for "trimmed pork steak". Here's a link
that has helped me to lose 160 pounds so far:


I forgot to mention... that would be cooked weight. You can look on
the cooking spray can for info on the amount of calories that might
add, but it's most likely negligible.

--
Zilbandy
  #4  
Old June 30th, 2007, 07:54 PM posted to alt.support.diet
Bill Eitner[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33
Default Calories after cooking

em wrote:
I bought some lf ground pork at the grocery store. It was pretty good
for pork, I thought: 4% fat, 1g of sat fat per 4oz serving.

Anyway, there was nutrition information on the back of the package that
said 180 calories per 4oz serving, etc. But the nutrition information
was for the raw meat.

Of course, there's the "added water" that evaporates during the cooking
process, and I'm guessing that the caloric density of the food changes
when this happens. Some of the fat drains out of the meat, too.

(All of the above also goes for ground turkey.)

In regards to preparation, I fried the meat along with a tiny spritz of
spray oil.

How do I handle this in terms of determining calories? Are the changes
insignificant?


With non-standard meat products (items where there is
no USDA after-cooking nutrition information) the best
you can do is to use the uncooked nutrition information.
Using your example, the calories in the spray oil and
the raw meat are what you would count. That way there's
no chance of underestimating it. At least that's the
way I would do it. I'd rather err on the side of
overestimating than underestimating. With lean meat
there's generally not much fat in the pan after cooking.
I don't know of any practical way to determine the
calorie count of any rendered fat left in the pan.
With that in mind, I generally stick to standard cuts
where I can use after cooking nutrition information
from the USDA (or other trustworthy) database.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
constant calories vs. varying calories KellyClarksonTV General Discussion 0 January 31st, 2005 10:18 PM
calories out greater than calories in = weight loss Mack©® General Discussion 2 October 18th, 2004 03:35 AM
calories out greater than calories in = weight loss Mack©® Low Carbohydrate Diets 2 October 18th, 2004 03:35 AM
calories out greater than calories in = weight loss Mack©® Low Carbohydrate Diets 10 October 17th, 2004 04:29 PM
Product Review: "Cooking TLC: Truly Low Carb Cooking, Volume I" by Karen Rysavy JulieW Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 November 6th, 2003 03:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.