A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is ketosis really the "backup" system?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 19th, 2004, 05:57 PM
jbuch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ignoramus16674 wrote:

They say that burning carbs is the "primary" system of getting energy,
and burning fat is secondary. I am curious what is the basis for
putting one first and another second.

i

\



Fron the threads, it seems as people are trying really hard to make the
issue of food digestion into a simple list.

Alcohol first
Carbs next (and this is somehow Primary)
FATS after that
Protein breakdown after that.....

It could be important to note the relative simplicity/complexity of the
basic molecules of :

Alcohol C2H5OH

Glucose C6H12O6

Oleic Acid C17H33COOH (olive oil)

Stearic Acid CH3(CH2)16COOH) (saturated fat in beef tallow)

Proteins -- No examples - too complex?

It would seem that the simplicity of the molecule might have a bearing
on the speed with which it is digested.

Then, one would concur that alcohol would be figested first, followed by
glucose and the fatty acids would be coming along next.... and maybe
proteins would be last because of the complexity of breaking these
things down to molecularly digestible pieces.

However, this is too much chemistry for most dieters, dieticians and MD's.

Jim

  #22  
Old August 19th, 2004, 05:57 PM
jbuch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ignoramus16674 wrote:

They say that burning carbs is the "primary" system of getting energy,
and burning fat is secondary. I am curious what is the basis for
putting one first and another second.

i

\



Fron the threads, it seems as people are trying really hard to make the
issue of food digestion into a simple list.

Alcohol first
Carbs next (and this is somehow Primary)
FATS after that
Protein breakdown after that.....

It could be important to note the relative simplicity/complexity of the
basic molecules of :

Alcohol C2H5OH

Glucose C6H12O6

Oleic Acid C17H33COOH (olive oil)

Stearic Acid CH3(CH2)16COOH) (saturated fat in beef tallow)

Proteins -- No examples - too complex?

It would seem that the simplicity of the molecule might have a bearing
on the speed with which it is digested.

Then, one would concur that alcohol would be figested first, followed by
glucose and the fatty acids would be coming along next.... and maybe
proteins would be last because of the complexity of breaking these
things down to molecularly digestible pieces.

However, this is too much chemistry for most dieters, dieticians and MD's.

Jim

  #23  
Old August 19th, 2004, 07:29 PM
Roger Zoul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jbuch wrote:
:: Ignoramus16674 wrote:
::
::: They say that burning carbs is the "primary" system of getting
::: energy, and burning fat is secondary. I am curious what is the
::: basis for putting one first and another second.
:::
::: i
:: \
::
::
::
:: Fron the threads, it seems as people are trying really hard to make
:: the issue of food digestion into a simple list.
::
:: Alcohol first
:: Carbs next (and this is somehow Primary)
:: FATS after that
:: Protein breakdown after that.....
::
:: It could be important to note the relative simplicity/complexity of
:: the basic molecules of :
::
:: Alcohol C2H5OH
::
:: Glucose C6H12O6
::
:: Oleic Acid C17H33COOH (olive oil)
::
:: Stearic Acid CH3(CH2)16COOH) (saturated fat in beef tallow)
::
:: Proteins -- No examples - too complex?
::
:: It would seem that the simplicity of the molecule might have a
:: bearing
:: on the speed with which it is digested.
::
:: Then, one would concur that alcohol would be figested first,
:: followed by glucose and the fatty acids would be coming along
:: next.... and maybe proteins would be last because of the complexity
:: of breaking these
:: things down to molecularly digestible pieces.
::
:: However, this is too much chemistry for most dieters, dieticians and
:: MD's.

The result of this is that if one floods the body with excessive amounts of
easily disgestable things, which are also low in nutrition, then the good
stuff will convert to fat and be stored. It would seem that the only time to
body can effectively use easy-to-disgest food items in when heavy exercise
is involved. In that case, the easily digestable calories get slopped up to
supply the quick energy demands and more nutrient dense foods can then
replenish/rebuild the body.

::
:: Jim


  #24  
Old August 19th, 2004, 07:29 PM
Roger Zoul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jbuch wrote:
:: Ignoramus16674 wrote:
::
::: They say that burning carbs is the "primary" system of getting
::: energy, and burning fat is secondary. I am curious what is the
::: basis for putting one first and another second.
:::
::: i
:: \
::
::
::
:: Fron the threads, it seems as people are trying really hard to make
:: the issue of food digestion into a simple list.
::
:: Alcohol first
:: Carbs next (and this is somehow Primary)
:: FATS after that
:: Protein breakdown after that.....
::
:: It could be important to note the relative simplicity/complexity of
:: the basic molecules of :
::
:: Alcohol C2H5OH
::
:: Glucose C6H12O6
::
:: Oleic Acid C17H33COOH (olive oil)
::
:: Stearic Acid CH3(CH2)16COOH) (saturated fat in beef tallow)
::
:: Proteins -- No examples - too complex?
::
:: It would seem that the simplicity of the molecule might have a
:: bearing
:: on the speed with which it is digested.
::
:: Then, one would concur that alcohol would be figested first,
:: followed by glucose and the fatty acids would be coming along
:: next.... and maybe proteins would be last because of the complexity
:: of breaking these
:: things down to molecularly digestible pieces.
::
:: However, this is too much chemistry for most dieters, dieticians and
:: MD's.

The result of this is that if one floods the body with excessive amounts of
easily disgestable things, which are also low in nutrition, then the good
stuff will convert to fat and be stored. It would seem that the only time to
body can effectively use easy-to-disgest food items in when heavy exercise
is involved. In that case, the easily digestable calories get slopped up to
supply the quick energy demands and more nutrient dense foods can then
replenish/rebuild the body.

::
:: Jim


  #25  
Old August 19th, 2004, 11:26 PM
Doug Freyburger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RRzVRR wrote:
Doug Freyburger wrote:

It's interesting that when you get into the chemistry, ketones
are the only fuel. Both fat and glucose get converted to ketones
before getting burned.


That's incorrect. The body uses both FFA and glucose without
going through ketone production.

A good read on Fatty Acid Oxidation:
http://www.indstate.edu/thcme/mwking...oxidation.html


That diagram clearly shows fatty acids being converted into a
ketone for consumption in the Krebs cycle.

Fat - fatty acid - ketone in blood - CO2+H2O

Carb - ketone in mitochondria - CO2+H2O

Fat or carb, it gets converted into ketones as it is being burned.
  #26  
Old August 19th, 2004, 11:26 PM
Doug Freyburger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RRzVRR wrote:
Doug Freyburger wrote:

It's interesting that when you get into the chemistry, ketones
are the only fuel. Both fat and glucose get converted to ketones
before getting burned.


That's incorrect. The body uses both FFA and glucose without
going through ketone production.

A good read on Fatty Acid Oxidation:
http://www.indstate.edu/thcme/mwking...oxidation.html


That diagram clearly shows fatty acids being converted into a
ketone for consumption in the Krebs cycle.

Fat - fatty acid - ketone in blood - CO2+H2O

Carb - ketone in mitochondria - CO2+H2O

Fat or carb, it gets converted into ketones as it is being burned.
  #27  
Old August 20th, 2004, 12:44 AM
Lee Rodgers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 19 Aug 2004 15:26:22 -0700, (Doug Freyburger)
wrote:

RRzVRR wrote:
Doug Freyburger wrote:

It's interesting that when you get into the chemistry, ketones
are the only fuel. Both fat and glucose get converted to ketones
before getting burned.


That's incorrect. The body uses both FFA and glucose without
going through ketone production.

A good read on Fatty Acid Oxidation:
http://www.indstate.edu/thcme/mwking...oxidation.html

That diagram clearly shows fatty acids being converted into a
ketone for consumption in the Krebs cycle.

Fat - fatty acid - ketone in blood - CO2+H2O

Carb - ketone in mitochondria - CO2+H2O

Fat or carb, it gets converted into ketones as it is being burned.

Doug,

Rudy is correct. The body uses FFA and glucose without ketone
production. I'll leave it to someone with more time and energy on
their hands to try and explain why your reasoning is confused. Your
"expert" pronouncements are going to need warning labels if you're not
more careful.

"During high rates of fatty acid oxidation, primarily in the liver,
large amounts of acetyl-CoA are generated. These exceed the capacity
of the TCA cycle, and one result is the synthesis of ketone bodies, or
ketogenesis."
Lee Rodgers
Lowcarb Retreat http://www.lowcarb.org
CHAT http://www.lowcarb.org/parachat.html
Low-Carb Connoisseur http://www.low-carb.com
  #28  
Old August 20th, 2004, 12:44 AM
Lee Rodgers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 19 Aug 2004 15:26:22 -0700, (Doug Freyburger)
wrote:

RRzVRR wrote:
Doug Freyburger wrote:

It's interesting that when you get into the chemistry, ketones
are the only fuel. Both fat and glucose get converted to ketones
before getting burned.


That's incorrect. The body uses both FFA and glucose without
going through ketone production.

A good read on Fatty Acid Oxidation:
http://www.indstate.edu/thcme/mwking...oxidation.html

That diagram clearly shows fatty acids being converted into a
ketone for consumption in the Krebs cycle.

Fat - fatty acid - ketone in blood - CO2+H2O

Carb - ketone in mitochondria - CO2+H2O

Fat or carb, it gets converted into ketones as it is being burned.

Doug,

Rudy is correct. The body uses FFA and glucose without ketone
production. I'll leave it to someone with more time and energy on
their hands to try and explain why your reasoning is confused. Your
"expert" pronouncements are going to need warning labels if you're not
more careful.

"During high rates of fatty acid oxidation, primarily in the liver,
large amounts of acetyl-CoA are generated. These exceed the capacity
of the TCA cycle, and one result is the synthesis of ketone bodies, or
ketogenesis."
Lee Rodgers
Lowcarb Retreat http://www.lowcarb.org
CHAT http://www.lowcarb.org/parachat.html
Low-Carb Connoisseur http://www.low-carb.com
  #29  
Old August 20th, 2004, 11:31 AM
RRzVRR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Freyburger wrote:

RRzVRR wrote:

Doug Freyburger wrote:


It's interesting that when you get into the chemistry, ketones
are the only fuel. Both fat and glucose get converted to ketones
before getting burned.


That's incorrect. The body uses both FFA and glucose without
going through ketone production.

A good read on Fatty Acid Oxidation:
http://www.indstate.edu/thcme/mwking...oxidation.html



No it doesn't. My only guess is that you're thinking that
acetyl CoA is the same as ketones.

That diagram clearly shows fatty acids being converted into a
ketone for consumption in the Krebs cycle.

Fat - fatty acid - ketone in blood - CO2+H2O

Carb - ketone in mitochondria - CO2+H2O

Fat or carb, it gets converted into ketones as it is being burned.


You should look into having a better understanding of the Krebs
cycle (also known as the TCA or citric acid cycle). I don't have
the time or desire to explain it here, but there's plenty of good
sites on line that will.



--
Rudy - Remove the Z from my address to respond.

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
-Emiliano Zapata

Check out the a.s.d.l-c FAQ at:
http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm


  #30  
Old August 20th, 2004, 11:31 AM
RRzVRR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Freyburger wrote:

RRzVRR wrote:

Doug Freyburger wrote:


It's interesting that when you get into the chemistry, ketones
are the only fuel. Both fat and glucose get converted to ketones
before getting burned.


That's incorrect. The body uses both FFA and glucose without
going through ketone production.

A good read on Fatty Acid Oxidation:
http://www.indstate.edu/thcme/mwking...oxidation.html



No it doesn't. My only guess is that you're thinking that
acetyl CoA is the same as ketones.

That diagram clearly shows fatty acids being converted into a
ketone for consumption in the Krebs cycle.

Fat - fatty acid - ketone in blood - CO2+H2O

Carb - ketone in mitochondria - CO2+H2O

Fat or carb, it gets converted into ketones as it is being burned.


You should look into having a better understanding of the Krebs
cycle (also known as the TCA or citric acid cycle). I don't have
the time or desire to explain it here, but there's plenty of good
sites on line that will.



--
Rudy - Remove the Z from my address to respond.

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
-Emiliano Zapata

Check out the a.s.d.l-c FAQ at:
http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nutritional Immunology: Proper Nutrition can Prevent & Even CureMany Diseases Kingsley Ohenhen Weightwatchers 0 May 5th, 2004 05:56 AM
Nutritional Immunology: Proper Nutrition can Prevent & Even Cure Many Diseases KO Fit For Life 0 May 5th, 2004 04:59 AM
Carbs vs. ketosis vs. ketonuria Hannah Gruen Low Carbohydrate Diets 4 April 28th, 2004 12:39 PM
What it all does to us....... Laurence Low Carbohydrate Diets 41 April 3rd, 2004 01:55 PM
Has just low-carb ever worked for anybody? Doug Lerner Low Carbohydrate Diets 83 March 31st, 2004 03:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.