If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
I'm finding this thread vaguely troubling.
I believe we each need to find what works for us, so I tend to not like "you must" statements. On the other hand, except for the tone, I completely agreed with everything the OP said. There is an article in the April edition of Real Simple magazine that, essentially, advocates a low-carb, sugar-free diet not for weight loss, but for general health. I really liked that a lot. And ideally, everyone here will someday reach their goal weight and will be eating for general health, not weight loss. The low-carb WOE should still be the best option then. Almost every "bad" calorie I used to eat was accompanied by sugar, because I was addicted to pastries. Pastries = sugar, trans-fats, and flour. Ick. My own option as I lose weight is to stay away from substitutes to the extent possible. I'm even trying to limit my Splenda intake. But if you can't or don't want to do that and find something else that works for you, go with what works. I'm just too skeptical to trust the substitutes and low-carb foods. I don't want to think "sweets" of any kind, because then I'll make excuses for myself down the road and may resume eating sugar. YMMV. My first week on low-carb, I was completely flummoxed at meal time. One day, I even skipped lunch because I couldn't figure out what to eat. A change in eating habits requires some thought, which should have been obvious but wasn't. But that thinking is part of the commitment to being healthier, whether I'm losing weight or at goal weight. I don't know if any of that makes sense or not, but this whole process is proving to be far more multi-faceted and complex than I imagined it would be. But the payoff should be enormous in terms of better health, which I think was underlying the original post. Substitutes are a crutch; if you can't do without them, that's your decision, but they might prove self-defeating in the long run. Daria 166/148/140 sugar-free since 2/1/04 low-carb since 2/17/04 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
well stay off it just till you lose the weight. after that those things are
FINE so long as you eat them reasonably. having carrots sourdough bread etc.. etc.. is fine even candy is fine. 50 years ago it was unheard of to have candy daily or even weekly or monthly. it was also unheard of to have it in the quantity that we have it nowadays. its all a matter of quantity (once you lose the weight that is when your fat you have to make sacrifices to get rid of the weight) I do not plan on using this way of eating for the rest of my life. if things go as I plan another 1. to 1.5 years. thats it. then I plan to start eating other foods again but I will carefully and visciously watch the amount quantity and frequency. I love my pasta. and oodles andnoodles soup. I love my fruit. bread I dont miss all that much so its not a big thing to me. I love carrots. potatoes are ok. I will enjoy them. responsibly. for now I am paying the price of not being responsible. I starts this diet at 415 pounds. I am now at 341 pounds. its well worth the temporary loss of those food items to compensate for my over abuse of them previously in type and quantity. now I am paying the price for those mistakes. its worth it to lose the weight trust me :-) Chris Taylor http://www.nerys.com/ "Bear" wrote in message hlink.net... Even though I think this person is a troll, I can't help but wonder if maybe she's right. If so I will never make it long term on this WOE. Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. People 30 years ago or so did not have the kind of weight problems we have today, in the numbers we have today. But they ate all of those things and more. What's the answer here? Are others here ready to give up all those things, not in just the short term, but forever? Is that what's neccessary? I find that very discouraging. I don't know that it would be worth it to me. I don't want to be 350 pounds, but I also don't want to live like a monk. Giving up every enjoyable treat so that I can have a 38 waist. I don't know if I'm rationalizing or what. I don't really have an uncontrolable urge to run out and start wolfing down high carb foods. Maybe JC was right when he got ****ed off at me and said I would always be fat. I'm very confused today. -- Bear Grrrrrrrrrrrr ) 297/264.5/210 http://home.earthlink.net/~polarbear50/ "katie k" wrote in message om... Interesting reading on the thread about the LC "goodies"... reading the group here it becomes clear that a few change forever and most "try to change" and cling to their old ways and ideas. 5 or 6 who seem to have eliminated sugar who I know here at school have had longer term success than the ones who have a "small portion" of their "treats" and time and time again speak on how they "cheated" or "weren't "good". Talking to my classmates and friends (and watching the support groups of other poor behaviors) it becomes clear that while with food you can't simply stop eating (like you can smoking) you can stop eating the foods that aren't good for you... even with family and friends observing and trying to influence your actions... But there does seem to be a secret that is beyond Atkins (at least after induction) and that seems to be ELIMINATION OF SUGAR... overweight people don't have a "normal" reaction to it and then when they put it back even in moderation after induction many don't really stay on the losing trend... That's why so many fear even going off of induction, and then before you know it they quit.. so perhaps the snswer is: Eliminate sugars of all types (fruit, breads, milks, etc)... I have 2 suitemates who did it and don't have the cravings they had...and yes, they are taking vitamins to make up for the lack of certain things a body needs. Just my opinion, but I got a feeling that those who keep "celebrating" LC fast food and LC "treats" ain't goin' anywhere but back up on the scale...think of it as a MEDICAL not a DIET issue: sugar in your system doesn't work like it does for thin people...for some reason it just hangs around then gives you both mental and physical cravings for the beast to be fed again... Time for SPRING BREAK... Remember: no excuses... just try a few weeks with no sugars of any sort (or as little as you can)...you just might change your life! BYEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!! Katie K |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
This is the same person who has been posting JC and the Queen taunts for a
month now. Just becuase she posts something you like doesn't change my opinion of her. And if you think a 38 waist is huge, you've got a problem. Not everyone thinks being skinny is a valuable asset. I like being a big man. I have no desire to look anything like you. "Ignoramus16930" wrote in message ... In article k.net, Bear wrote: Even though I think this person is a troll, That was quite possibly the best written post of the day, which was 100% on topic. How can you call it a troll? I can't help but wonder if maybe she's right. If so I will never make it long term on this WOE. Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. I am not sure how eating no sugar implies no corn on the cob, myself. You are going too far. I personally eat no sweetened foods, no matter what the sweetener. I have had reasonable success as I have maintained my weight loss for 6 months with no major struggles. I eat sourdough bread, carrots, peas, NO birthday cake on anyone's birthday, and corn -- in moderation. People 30 years ago or so did not have the kind of weight problems we have today, in the numbers we have today. But they ate all of those things and more. many people who were slim 30 years ago are now fat. it takes time to get fat. What's the answer here? Are others here ready to give up all those things, not in just the short term, but forever? Is that what's neccessary? I find that very discouraging. I don't know that it would be worth it to me. I don't want to be 350 pounds, but I also don't want to live like a monk. try not to depend on mouth sensation too much, and like I said, you are overgeneralizing the OP's suggestions. A mild calorie restriction is likely to make all foods taste delicious. Giving up every enjoyable treat so that I can have a 38 waist. 38 waist?????????????????????/ I don't know if I'm rationalizing or what. I don't really have an uncontrolable urge to run out and start wolfing down high carb foods. Maybe JC was right when he got ****ed off at me and said I would always be fat. I'm very confused today. Maybe he was right. Life is cruel. If you value mouth sensation over 38 inch waist (which is a huge waist), maybe you will not have even 38 inch waist. i |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
You just said it again in a later post. You can never eat wheat products
again. I know you've said before that you'll never eat bread again. Is never again different from the rest of your life? -- Bear Grrrrrrrrrrrr ) 297/264.5/210 http://home.earthlink.net/~polarbear50/ "Crafting Mom" wrote in message ... Bear wrote: . Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. Did I say "rest of my life?".... wow, amazing I don't even have to say something to have said it. I just said that going without sweet things for a sustained period of time helped my taste buds to adjust.... CM (who does eat carrots and peas) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
Thanks. I enjoyed reading about your experience. I'll take it to heart.
-- Bear Grrrrrrrrrrrr ) 297/264.5/210 http://home.earthlink.net/~polarbear50/ "TurtleBeachGal" wrote in message ... Bear, Don't be confused. This is an individual path and you will find what will work for you. There are a lot of low carb diet nazi's on this board that think there is only ONE way to low carb and it's their way. Any other way will insure failure. It's not true. The important thing is to know yourself and to learn what will work for you. I'm with you. I see no good reason to have to give up all treats forever and ever. Can they be a regular part of my food plan? NO! Can I have a cupcake or a slice of cake on my birthday? Yes. Can I have a whole cake in the house? Nope... cause I"ll eat it. Will I buy a cake and then send it home with other people who can eat it? yes. Usually, for my birthday or a special event, I'd rather treat myself to a good seafood dinner than a piece of cake but every rare once in a while the chocolate cake sounds better. .... it works for me. I don't keep junk food in the house and I rarely want it. And to be honest, even when I'm wanting "junk" the stuff that is available isn't worth it. Now maybe if it was really excellent I'd be more willing to make an exception but even then it would be exactly that... a rare exception. Eating one slice of birthday cake on a "rare" occassion isn't going to make you fat If you make those occassions the rule rather than the exception then you're courting failure. I have so many birthday's to celebrate in the month of september that I could easily gain 20#s so I choose to eat a good low carb mean before going to the celebration so I'm not hungry and easily tempted. Perhaps if I'm feeling a bit depressed and feeling the need to self medicate with food instead of going for chocolate cake I'll pick up some shrimp or try one of the great recipes that I've gotten off of this board. I'll get my "treat", feel better and not have sabotaged myself. For me I can't have milk in the house. I can easily drink 1/2 a gallon or more daily. I'll have the low carb "dairy beverage" in the house on occassion but dont' feel like I can have it in here all the time. For some people milk etc is not an issue and it will go bad in their house. It's all individual. I appreciate having lower carb versions of foods like bread available but once again you have to know yourself. I can have regular super market lower carb bread in the house without a problem. My mom gave me a loaf of Great Harvest Breads low carb white bread (5 grams per slice) and it was too good. LOL. I won't have it in my house on a regular basis. I go through it way too fast. It's all a learning process. Stick to the basics and real food (low carb) and you'll do great. The world will not come to an end if you have the occassional treat. Ignore the food police (both low fat and low carb versions of the food nazi's). There are a lot of people in the world who enjoy spewing their opinion out for all to see and try to make people who don't agree feel bad. Don't fall for it. They aren't people you'd want to associate with anyway. JC was not right when he said you would always be fat unless you let him be. Prove him wrong. You've already done a great job. You know how. It's just a matter of implementing it on a daily basis. Sort of like an alcoholic. You just do it now and don't put stumbling blocks in your way. Personally, I think fitting into my lower size jeans and not having the triple by-pass that I was destined for "tastes" a lot better than most high carb treats. It doesn't however, keep me in a straight jacket. I can live my life, make my choices and live with the consequences. The occassional treat doesn't immediately throw me into jeans two sizes larger or send my triglycerides sky high. I've found what works for me. I"m happy. I don't really care what anyone else thinks. I hope you can find that same thing. Good luck!! Susan aka turtlebeachgal Even though I think this person is a troll, I can't help but wonder if maybe she's right. If so I will never make it long term on this WOE. Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. People 30 years ago or so did not have the kind of weight problems we have today, in the numbers we have today. But they ate all of those things and more. They also tended to do a lot more physical labor. What's the answer here? Are others here ready to give up all those things, not in just the short term, but forever? Is that what's neccessary? I find that very discouraging. I don't know that it would be worth it to me. I don't want to be 350 pounds, but I also don't want to live like a monk. Giving up every enjoyable treat so that I can have a 38 waist. I don't know if I'm rationalizing or what. I don't really have an uncontrolable urge to run out and start wolfing down high carb foods. Maybe JC was right when he got ****ed off at me and said I would always be fat. I'm very confused today. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
Bear wrote:
You just said it again in a later post. You can never eat wheat products again. I know you've said before that you'll never eat bread again. Is never again different from the rest of your life? I was responding to THIS..... Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. I still (on occasion) *do* eat carrots, peas, watermelon, or corn on the cob. I simply choose not to eat foods (like bread) which do harm to *my* body, as in a food sensitivity. I was correcting the errors in the above paragraph, that is all. My response to the original post did not mention going without bread for the rest of my life. Here is that post: Note that in the following post I did not say "rest of my life", nor did I mention the bread. [begin quote] PJx wrote: On 13 Mar 2004 05:48:17 -0800, (katie k) wrote: Remember: no excuses... just try a few weeks with no sugars of any sort (or as little as you can)...you just might change your life! BYEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!! Katie K **How*about*the*sugar*in*berries?***Carrots?**... . I've actually gone without berries, carrots, artificial sweeteners, or sugar of any description, OR junky foods with additives, for months and months.**By*the*time*I*finally*did*start*adding* blueberries back, they tasted like a major sugar blast!** I used to think blueberries were "mildly sweet" but after re-conditioning my body to like the food it's meant to like, it was to me what snickers bars are to most people. By the time my body isn't constantly drip-fed sweet things on a daily basis the taste buds adjust accordingly.**It*was*getting*to* the point where cucumbers tasted extremely sweet to me. People are often afraid to see what their taste buds will do when left to their own natural devices.**It's*understandable.**The*idea* that a cucumber could end up tasting like watermelon used to, was once one I scoffed at, myself.**Until*I*tried*it,*seriously,*on*myself. CM [end quote] |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
Crafting Mom burbled across the ether:
Bear wrote: You just said it again in a later post. You can never eat wheat products again. She only said it once. You're conflating two different topics, one of choice, and one of necessity. I know you've said before that you'll never eat bread again. Is never again different from the rest of your life? In the case of wheat products, no. In the case of other foods, she eats them far less often and in lesser amounts, making them a treat rather than a staple. I was responding to THIS..... Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. I still (on occasion) *do* eat carrots, peas, watermelon, or corn on the cob. I simply choose not to eat foods (like bread) which do harm to *my* body, as in a food sensitivity. I was correcting the errors in the above paragraph, that is all. In other words, yes, you will never eat bread again for the rest of your life. That was what Bear asked. It, however is NOT because of a diet choice, but because you have a food sensitivity. Celiac disease, yes? My response to the original post did not mention going without bread for the rest of my life. Here is that post: Note that in the following post I did not say "rest of my life", nor did I mention the bread. That's true. Did I help clear that up? -- revek www.geocities.com/tanirevek/LowCarb.html lowcarbing since June 2002 5'2" 41 F 165+/too much/size seven petite please Now and then an innocent man is sent to legislature. - Kin Hubbard |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
revek wrote:
Crafting Mom burbled across the ether: Bear wrote: You just said it again in a later post. You can never eat wheat products again. She only said it once. You're conflating two different topics, one of choice, and one of necessity. I know you've said before that you'll never eat bread again. Is never again different from the rest of your life? In the case of wheat products, no. In the case of other foods, she eats them far less often and in lesser amounts, making them a treat rather than a staple. Correct. I was responding to THIS..... Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. I still (on occasion) *do* eat carrots, peas, watermelon, or corn on the cob. I simply choose not to eat foods (like bread) which do harm to *my* body, as in a food sensitivity. I was correcting the errors in the above paragraph, that is all. In other words, yes, you will never eat bread again for the rest of your life. That was what Bear asked. It, however is NOT because of a diet choice, but because you have a food sensitivity. Celiac disease, yes? Not celiac, but a different sensitivity. My response to the original post did not mention going without bread for the rest of my life. Here is that post: Note that in the following post I did not say "rest of my life", nor did I mention the bread. That's true. Did I help clear that up? Yes. Thanks revek. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
A lot of people can't eat wheat products, it's a very common allergen. I
had actually pretty much given up wheat before I started low carbing. My daughter who is a vegetarian plus occasional fish or other seafood finds that if she eats much wheat she has backaches. In link.net, Bear stated | You just said it again in a later post. You can never eat wheat | products again. I know you've said before that you'll never eat bread | again. Is never again different from the rest of your life? | -- | Bear | Grrrrrrrrrrrr ) | 297/264.5/210 | http://home.earthlink.net/~polarbear50/ | | "Crafting Mom" wrote in message | ... || Bear wrote: || . ||| Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life ||| without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on ||| birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. || || Did I say "rest of my life?".... || wow, amazing I don't even have to say something to have said it. || I just said that going without sweet things for a sustained period of || time helped my taste buds to adjust.... || CM (who does eat carrots and peas) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
entemans, sugar, "treats" being "good" and "fat people"
You've said it other posts. You may not remember but you said that you woule
never eat bread again. I'm not going to bother googleing it, but you said it to Jenny. -- Bear Grrrrrrrrrrrr ) 297/264.5/210 http://home.earthlink.net/~polarbear50/ "Crafting Mom" wrote in message ... Bear wrote: You just said it again in a later post. You can never eat wheat products again. I know you've said before that you'll never eat bread again. Is never again different from the rest of your life? I was responding to THIS..... Unlike Crafting Mom, I cannot imagine going for the rest of my life without sourdough bread, carrots, peas, birhday cake (on birthday's), watermelon or corn on the cob. I still (on occasion) *do* eat carrots, peas, watermelon, or corn on the cob. I simply choose not to eat foods (like bread) which do harm to *my* body, as in a food sensitivity. I was correcting the errors in the above paragraph, that is all. My response to the original post did not mention going without bread for the rest of my life. Here is that post: Note that in the following post I did not say "rest of my life", nor did I mention the bread. [begin quote] PJx wrote: On 13 Mar 2004 05:48:17 -0800, (katie k) wrote: Remember: no excuses... just try a few weeks with no sugars of any sort (or as little as you can)...you just might change your life! BYEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!! Katie K How about the sugar in berries? Carrots? .... I've actually gone without berries, carrots, artificial sweeteners, or sugar of any description, OR junky foods with additives, for months and months. By the time I finally did start adding blueberries back, they tasted like a major sugar blast! I used to think blueberries were "mildly sweet" but after re-conditioning my body to like the food it's meant to like, it was to me what snickers bars are to most people. By the time my body isn't constantly drip-fed sweet things on a daily basis the taste buds adjust accordingly. It was getting to the point where cucumbers tasted extremely sweet to me. People are often afraid to see what their taste buds will do when left to their own natural devices. It's understandable. The idea that a cucumber could end up tasting like watermelon used to, was once one I scoffed at, myself. Until I tried it, seriously, on myself. CM [end quote] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|