Eat Right For Your Blood Type

Has anyone done or doing this diet? I am so interested in this diet and
would like to know why there are not many people mentioning this diet.

I think this is the best!

Are you exercising now? Are you planning to increase your exercise? People
here are going for good health and they know that they have to exercise to
be healthy. It doesn't mean you can eat as much as you want. Plus if you
read the postings you will see lots of rejection of magic bullets.

Start an exercise program, eat a wide variety of high fiber low fat food,
keep your portion sizes and numbers limited.

"conjason" wrote in message
...
Has anyone done or doing this diet? I am so interested in this diet and
would like to know why there are not many people mentioning this diet.

I think this is the best!

"conjason" wrote in message
...
Has anyone done or doing this diet? I am so interested in this diet and
would like to know why there are not many people mentioning this diet.

That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.

GG

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:

That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.

Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.

MU wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:


That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.


Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.

About as dead as your credibility. Say, did you ever look it up after
I showed you that you didn't know what it meant?

Bob

I missed the beginning of this conversation but I looked into that book
before doing Atkins and I think it makes perfect scientific sense if you
read it from front to back. I also followed it religiously and lost a
little weight before switching to Atkins. The food allowance is too
structured in my opinion on the ERFYBT book
I am a type 0+ and I just decided that since I am already a meat eater
Atkins might be good. (of course I eat plenty of veggies as well)
I have often thought of switching to ERFYBT after I get to goal. Not going
above my carb limit of course, but adding things like spelt pasta and sweet
potato. Who knows, It's been a while since I have read that book. For now, I
am sticking with Atkins.

just my thoughts.
hugs,

Tonya
www.lowcarbcrew.com



"Bob (this one)" wrote in message
...
MU wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:


That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The
only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.


Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.

About as dead as your credibility. Say, did you ever look it up after
I showed you that you didn't know what it meant?

Bob

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:46:40 -0600, "Tonya"
wrote:

I missed the beginning of this conversation but I looked into that book
before doing Atkins and I think it makes perfect scientific sense if you
read it from front to back. I also followed it religiously and lost a
little weight before switching to Atkins. The food allowance is too
structured in my opinion on the ERFYBT book
I am a type 0+ and I just decided that since I am already a meat eater
Atkins might be good. (of course I eat plenty of veggies as well)
I have often thought of switching to ERFYBT after I get to goal. Not going
above my carb limit of course, but adding things like spelt pasta and sweet
potato. Who knows, It's been a while since I have read that book. For now, I
am sticking with Atkins.

Well, I haven't read this book, but I am also an O+ and have lost just
fine on a balanced diet. I see no reason to think blood type makes
any difference. Most diets work for a large number of people if they
follow them carefully, hence there's significant anecdotal evidence
that every popular diet works. Probably most people could take any of
the recommended eating plans in the blood type diet book, follow it,
and lose weight.

Chris
262/141/ (145-150)

I missed the beginning of this conversation but I looked into that book
before doing Atkins and I think it makes perfect scientific sense if you
read it from front to back. I also followed it religiously and lost a
little weight before switching to Atkins. The food allowance is too
structured in my opinion on the ERFYBT book
I am a type 0+ and I just decided that since I am already a meat eater
Atkins might be good. (of course I eat plenty of veggies as well)
I have often thought of switching to ERFYBT after I get to goal. Not going
above my carb limit of course, but adding things like spelt pasta and sweet
potato. Who knows, It's been a while since I have read that book. For now, I
am sticking with Atkins.

just my thoughts.
hugs,

Tonya
www.lowcarbcrew.com



"Bob (this one)" wrote in message
...
MU wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:


That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The
only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.


Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.

About as dead as your credibility. Say, did you ever look it up after
I showed you that you didn't know what it meant?

Bob

MU wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:


That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.


Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.

About as dead as your credibility. Say, did you ever look it up after
I showed you that you didn't know what it meant?

Bob

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:38:40 -0700, GaryG wrote:

That's because that "diet" is bogus, and has no scientific basis. The only
value in that diet was the $$ the author raked in from selling books to
gullible people desperate for a simplistic solution.

Hm. And here I thought Bob Atkins was dead.