Snooty? Maybe

"Ignoramus5751" wrote in message
...
Dark, my advice:if you want to lose weight and get some support from
this group, it is best not to engage in this stuff. There is plenty of
other newsgroups where you can safely enrage other people etc, but if
you do it here, you will quickly find that you are not getting good
answers to your diet questions.

I have to say ditto to that. Your personal life is what it is, if you're
happy, great, if not, work on it. This is a diet group. My suggestion is
change your moniker and keep your posts on-topic.

Yah, yah, public newsgroup and all that. Your choice.

Ignoramus9727 wrote:

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:35:56 GMT, Phil M. wrote:
Leafing through alt.support.diet, I read a message from
lid of 18 Dec 2004:


Shorter than the man, but not shorter than the average woman. Is that
what you meant?

That's correct.


HEY! I'm not too short to date *anyone*!


--
Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110 60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02 Maintained since 2/03

"Doug Freyburger" wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh sure, I bet the only reason she went after him is his height.
Yeah,
right....

Like that hasn't happened before? When I was single and I read the
personals there were lot's of women who specified minimum heights
in potential male dates.

And the men never had any specifications?

I find it interesting how put out the males are about women preferring
taller men especially since men never have any dating preferences based on
physical traits.

Jenn
5'5" married to a 5'7" man