A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Breast Cancer and Diet



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 10th, 2004, 07:20 AM
Ray Audette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Breast Cancer and Diet

"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message ...
"Ignoramus28438" wrote in message
...
It is hard to say what Mary meant by "healthy" carbs, since she did
not elaborate, but starch is linked to breast cancer.


Fruits, vegetables, whole grains -- as opposed to refined sugar.

Mary


Fruits and vegatables that are edible raw are fine but:
As I mention in my book, grains were the first known carcinogen. In
1843 it was discovered at The U of Paris Medical School that
epidemological cancer rates mirrored per-capita grain consumption
everywhere such data was available. The relationship between grain
and cancer was thus 120 years more mathmatically obvious than that of
cancer and tobacco.

The reason for this was only discovered in Sweden when in 2002 foods
were tested for acrylamides. Levels in bread were found to exceed
those considered a cancer risk by 300 times. One needs a OSHA permit
to use pesticides with this level of carcinogens.

This makes a single slice of bread a far more likely source of cancer
than a cigarette. It is also the first known discovery of a
carcinogen that predicts epidemological cancer rates ( again). All
other known causes of cancer are but mere statistical noise in
comparison.

Acrylamides are also found in potato products, french fried potatoes
being even worse than bread. PubMed ( available free to everyone due
to public funding)is full of references to current research on this
topic.

When can we expect warning label, such as found on cigarette packs, on
such products? When can we expect full disclosure from Frito-Lay and
other multi-nationals about the testing they're doing now on
acrylamides?

Ray Audette
Author "NeanderThin"
www.NeanderThin.com
  #12  
Old August 10th, 2004, 07:20 AM
Ray Audette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Breast Cancer and Diet

"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message ...
"Ignoramus28438" wrote in message
...
It is hard to say what Mary meant by "healthy" carbs, since she did
not elaborate, but starch is linked to breast cancer.


Fruits, vegetables, whole grains -- as opposed to refined sugar.

Mary


Fruits and vegatables that are edible raw are fine but:
As I mention in my book, grains were the first known carcinogen. In
1843 it was discovered at The U of Paris Medical School that
epidemological cancer rates mirrored per-capita grain consumption
everywhere such data was available. The relationship between grain
and cancer was thus 120 years more mathmatically obvious than that of
cancer and tobacco.

The reason for this was only discovered in Sweden when in 2002 foods
were tested for acrylamides. Levels in bread were found to exceed
those considered a cancer risk by 300 times. One needs a OSHA permit
to use pesticides with this level of carcinogens.

This makes a single slice of bread a far more likely source of cancer
than a cigarette. It is also the first known discovery of a
carcinogen that predicts epidemological cancer rates ( again). All
other known causes of cancer are but mere statistical noise in
comparison.

Acrylamides are also found in potato products, french fried potatoes
being even worse than bread. PubMed ( available free to everyone due
to public funding)is full of references to current research on this
topic.

When can we expect warning label, such as found on cigarette packs, on
such products? When can we expect full disclosure from Frito-Lay and
other multi-nationals about the testing they're doing now on
acrylamides?

Ray Audette
Author "NeanderThin"
www.NeanderThin.com
  #13  
Old August 10th, 2004, 07:20 AM
Ray Audette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message ...
"Ignoramus28438" wrote in message
...
It is hard to say what Mary meant by "healthy" carbs, since she did
not elaborate, but starch is linked to breast cancer.


Fruits, vegetables, whole grains -- as opposed to refined sugar.

Mary


Fruits and vegatables that are edible raw are fine but:
As I mention in my book, grains were the first known carcinogen. In
1843 it was discovered at The U of Paris Medical School that
epidemological cancer rates mirrored per-capita grain consumption
everywhere such data was available. The relationship between grain
and cancer was thus 120 years more mathmatically obvious than that of
cancer and tobacco.

The reason for this was only discovered in Sweden when in 2002 foods
were tested for acrylamides. Levels in bread were found to exceed
those considered a cancer risk by 300 times. One needs a OSHA permit
to use pesticides with this level of carcinogens.

This makes a single slice of bread a far more likely source of cancer
than a cigarette. It is also the first known discovery of a
carcinogen that predicts epidemological cancer rates ( again). All
other known causes of cancer are but mere statistical noise in
comparison.

Acrylamides are also found in potato products, french fried potatoes
being even worse than bread. PubMed ( available free to everyone due
to public funding)is full of references to current research on this
topic.

When can we expect warning label, such as found on cigarette packs, on
such products? When can we expect full disclosure from Frito-Lay and
other multi-nationals about the testing they're doing now on
acrylamides?

Ray Audette
Author "NeanderThin"
www.NeanderThin.com
  #14  
Old August 10th, 2004, 07:31 AM
Ray Audette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Breast Cancer and Diet

"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message
In the study, the two highest associations to breast cancer
were sucrose intake and obesity.


A previous study found an even higher risk This was also reported in
The Harvard Women's Health watch:


BMJ 2001;322:1566 ( 30 June )

News extra

High bone density increases risk of breast cancer
Scott Gottlieb New York



Older women with high bone density are about twice as likely to
develop breast cancer, a new study has found.

These results add to existing evidence that suggests that older women
who have low bone mass have a decreased risk of breast cancer and,
conversely, that higher bone density is associated with increased risk
of breast cancer.

Bone mineral density can be an accurate marker of the body's response
to oestrogen, in that women with higher bone density are thought to be
physiologically more sensitive to the hormone's effects than women
with lower bone density.

Because oestrogens have also been linked to risk of breast cancer,
researchers in this study sought to determine if bone density might
help also to predict the risk of breast cancer in older women.

The study, led by Dr Jane Cauley of the University of Pittsburgh
Medical Center, followed the health history of 8905 women who were 65
years or older and without breast cancer.

After six years it found that the women who scored highest on three
types of bone mineral density tests (performed on the bones of the
wrist, arm, and heel) were also more likely to develop breast cancer
(Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:930-936).

During the six year period a total of 315 women (3.5%) developed
breast cancer.

After adjusting for other risk factors that contribute to breast
cancer, such as age and obesity, the investigators found that the risk
for women with the highest bone density for all three skeletal sites
was 2.7 times greater than that for women with the lowest measurement
of bone density for all three sites.

"The results suggest that bone mineral density is one of the most
powerful predictors of breast cancer, especially advanced breast
cancer, among elderly women," Dr Cauley said.

[ high bone density is an indicator of milk consumption - see any "Got
Milk" ad]
[The 2 studies quoted in the Harvard article gave a higher risk factor
3.5 to 4.5 times over the base line for breast cancer.]

Could bovine estrogens in milk affect the human immune system? Bovine
insulin in milk has been implicated in Juvinile Diabetes- hmmmm.

Ray Audette
Author "NeanderThin"
www.NeanderThin.com
  #15  
Old August 10th, 2004, 07:31 AM
Ray Audette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Breast Cancer and Diet

"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message
In the study, the two highest associations to breast cancer
were sucrose intake and obesity.


A previous study found an even higher risk This was also reported in
The Harvard Women's Health watch:


BMJ 2001;322:1566 ( 30 June )

News extra

High bone density increases risk of breast cancer
Scott Gottlieb New York



Older women with high bone density are about twice as likely to
develop breast cancer, a new study has found.

These results add to existing evidence that suggests that older women
who have low bone mass have a decreased risk of breast cancer and,
conversely, that higher bone density is associated with increased risk
of breast cancer.

Bone mineral density can be an accurate marker of the body's response
to oestrogen, in that women with higher bone density are thought to be
physiologically more sensitive to the hormone's effects than women
with lower bone density.

Because oestrogens have also been linked to risk of breast cancer,
researchers in this study sought to determine if bone density might
help also to predict the risk of breast cancer in older women.

The study, led by Dr Jane Cauley of the University of Pittsburgh
Medical Center, followed the health history of 8905 women who were 65
years or older and without breast cancer.

After six years it found that the women who scored highest on three
types of bone mineral density tests (performed on the bones of the
wrist, arm, and heel) were also more likely to develop breast cancer
(Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:930-936).

During the six year period a total of 315 women (3.5%) developed
breast cancer.

After adjusting for other risk factors that contribute to breast
cancer, such as age and obesity, the investigators found that the risk
for women with the highest bone density for all three skeletal sites
was 2.7 times greater than that for women with the lowest measurement
of bone density for all three sites.

"The results suggest that bone mineral density is one of the most
powerful predictors of breast cancer, especially advanced breast
cancer, among elderly women," Dr Cauley said.

[ high bone density is an indicator of milk consumption - see any "Got
Milk" ad]
[The 2 studies quoted in the Harvard article gave a higher risk factor
3.5 to 4.5 times over the base line for breast cancer.]

Could bovine estrogens in milk affect the human immune system? Bovine
insulin in milk has been implicated in Juvinile Diabetes- hmmmm.

Ray Audette
Author "NeanderThin"
www.NeanderThin.com
  #16  
Old August 10th, 2004, 07:31 AM
Ray Audette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message
In the study, the two highest associations to breast cancer
were sucrose intake and obesity.


A previous study found an even higher risk This was also reported in
The Harvard Women's Health watch:


BMJ 2001;322:1566 ( 30 June )

News extra

High bone density increases risk of breast cancer
Scott Gottlieb New York



Older women with high bone density are about twice as likely to
develop breast cancer, a new study has found.

These results add to existing evidence that suggests that older women
who have low bone mass have a decreased risk of breast cancer and,
conversely, that higher bone density is associated with increased risk
of breast cancer.

Bone mineral density can be an accurate marker of the body's response
to oestrogen, in that women with higher bone density are thought to be
physiologically more sensitive to the hormone's effects than women
with lower bone density.

Because oestrogens have also been linked to risk of breast cancer,
researchers in this study sought to determine if bone density might
help also to predict the risk of breast cancer in older women.

The study, led by Dr Jane Cauley of the University of Pittsburgh
Medical Center, followed the health history of 8905 women who were 65
years or older and without breast cancer.

After six years it found that the women who scored highest on three
types of bone mineral density tests (performed on the bones of the
wrist, arm, and heel) were also more likely to develop breast cancer
(Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:930-936).

During the six year period a total of 315 women (3.5%) developed
breast cancer.

After adjusting for other risk factors that contribute to breast
cancer, such as age and obesity, the investigators found that the risk
for women with the highest bone density for all three skeletal sites
was 2.7 times greater than that for women with the lowest measurement
of bone density for all three sites.

"The results suggest that bone mineral density is one of the most
powerful predictors of breast cancer, especially advanced breast
cancer, among elderly women," Dr Cauley said.

[ high bone density is an indicator of milk consumption - see any "Got
Milk" ad]
[The 2 studies quoted in the Harvard article gave a higher risk factor
3.5 to 4.5 times over the base line for breast cancer.]

Could bovine estrogens in milk affect the human immune system? Bovine
insulin in milk has been implicated in Juvinile Diabetes- hmmmm.

Ray Audette
Author "NeanderThin"
www.NeanderThin.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eating lots of carbs may raise breast cancer risk, study finds marengo Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 August 6th, 2004 06:56 AM
You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof. marengo Low Carbohydrate Diets 173 April 17th, 2004 11:26 PM
Docs serve up diet surprise: Fat may help, soy may not stop cancer Diarmid Logan General Discussion 3 October 30th, 2003 11:13 PM
Docs serve up diet surprise: Fat may help, soy may not stop cancer Diarmid Logan Low Carbohydrate Diets 3 October 30th, 2003 11:13 PM
On "Weighing Obesity" Steve Chaney, aka Papa Gunnykins ® Low Carbohydrate Diets 2 September 24th, 2003 03:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.