If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Breast Cancer and Diet
"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message ...
"Ignoramus28438" wrote in message ... It is hard to say what Mary meant by "healthy" carbs, since she did not elaborate, but starch is linked to breast cancer. Fruits, vegetables, whole grains -- as opposed to refined sugar. Mary Fruits and vegatables that are edible raw are fine but: As I mention in my book, grains were the first known carcinogen. In 1843 it was discovered at The U of Paris Medical School that epidemological cancer rates mirrored per-capita grain consumption everywhere such data was available. The relationship between grain and cancer was thus 120 years more mathmatically obvious than that of cancer and tobacco. The reason for this was only discovered in Sweden when in 2002 foods were tested for acrylamides. Levels in bread were found to exceed those considered a cancer risk by 300 times. One needs a OSHA permit to use pesticides with this level of carcinogens. This makes a single slice of bread a far more likely source of cancer than a cigarette. It is also the first known discovery of a carcinogen that predicts epidemological cancer rates ( again). All other known causes of cancer are but mere statistical noise in comparison. Acrylamides are also found in potato products, french fried potatoes being even worse than bread. PubMed ( available free to everyone due to public funding)is full of references to current research on this topic. When can we expect warning label, such as found on cigarette packs, on such products? When can we expect full disclosure from Frito-Lay and other multi-nationals about the testing they're doing now on acrylamides? Ray Audette Author "NeanderThin" www.NeanderThin.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Breast Cancer and Diet
"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message ...
"Ignoramus28438" wrote in message ... It is hard to say what Mary meant by "healthy" carbs, since she did not elaborate, but starch is linked to breast cancer. Fruits, vegetables, whole grains -- as opposed to refined sugar. Mary Fruits and vegatables that are edible raw are fine but: As I mention in my book, grains were the first known carcinogen. In 1843 it was discovered at The U of Paris Medical School that epidemological cancer rates mirrored per-capita grain consumption everywhere such data was available. The relationship between grain and cancer was thus 120 years more mathmatically obvious than that of cancer and tobacco. The reason for this was only discovered in Sweden when in 2002 foods were tested for acrylamides. Levels in bread were found to exceed those considered a cancer risk by 300 times. One needs a OSHA permit to use pesticides with this level of carcinogens. This makes a single slice of bread a far more likely source of cancer than a cigarette. It is also the first known discovery of a carcinogen that predicts epidemological cancer rates ( again). All other known causes of cancer are but mere statistical noise in comparison. Acrylamides are also found in potato products, french fried potatoes being even worse than bread. PubMed ( available free to everyone due to public funding)is full of references to current research on this topic. When can we expect warning label, such as found on cigarette packs, on such products? When can we expect full disclosure from Frito-Lay and other multi-nationals about the testing they're doing now on acrylamides? Ray Audette Author "NeanderThin" www.NeanderThin.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message ...
"Ignoramus28438" wrote in message ... It is hard to say what Mary meant by "healthy" carbs, since she did not elaborate, but starch is linked to breast cancer. Fruits, vegetables, whole grains -- as opposed to refined sugar. Mary Fruits and vegatables that are edible raw are fine but: As I mention in my book, grains were the first known carcinogen. In 1843 it was discovered at The U of Paris Medical School that epidemological cancer rates mirrored per-capita grain consumption everywhere such data was available. The relationship between grain and cancer was thus 120 years more mathmatically obvious than that of cancer and tobacco. The reason for this was only discovered in Sweden when in 2002 foods were tested for acrylamides. Levels in bread were found to exceed those considered a cancer risk by 300 times. One needs a OSHA permit to use pesticides with this level of carcinogens. This makes a single slice of bread a far more likely source of cancer than a cigarette. It is also the first known discovery of a carcinogen that predicts epidemological cancer rates ( again). All other known causes of cancer are but mere statistical noise in comparison. Acrylamides are also found in potato products, french fried potatoes being even worse than bread. PubMed ( available free to everyone due to public funding)is full of references to current research on this topic. When can we expect warning label, such as found on cigarette packs, on such products? When can we expect full disclosure from Frito-Lay and other multi-nationals about the testing they're doing now on acrylamides? Ray Audette Author "NeanderThin" www.NeanderThin.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Breast Cancer and Diet
"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message
In the study, the two highest associations to breast cancer were sucrose intake and obesity. A previous study found an even higher risk This was also reported in The Harvard Women's Health watch: BMJ 2001;322:1566 ( 30 June ) News extra High bone density increases risk of breast cancer Scott Gottlieb New York Older women with high bone density are about twice as likely to develop breast cancer, a new study has found. These results add to existing evidence that suggests that older women who have low bone mass have a decreased risk of breast cancer and, conversely, that higher bone density is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Bone mineral density can be an accurate marker of the body's response to oestrogen, in that women with higher bone density are thought to be physiologically more sensitive to the hormone's effects than women with lower bone density. Because oestrogens have also been linked to risk of breast cancer, researchers in this study sought to determine if bone density might help also to predict the risk of breast cancer in older women. The study, led by Dr Jane Cauley of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, followed the health history of 8905 women who were 65 years or older and without breast cancer. After six years it found that the women who scored highest on three types of bone mineral density tests (performed on the bones of the wrist, arm, and heel) were also more likely to develop breast cancer (Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:930-936). During the six year period a total of 315 women (3.5%) developed breast cancer. After adjusting for other risk factors that contribute to breast cancer, such as age and obesity, the investigators found that the risk for women with the highest bone density for all three skeletal sites was 2.7 times greater than that for women with the lowest measurement of bone density for all three sites. "The results suggest that bone mineral density is one of the most powerful predictors of breast cancer, especially advanced breast cancer, among elderly women," Dr Cauley said. [ high bone density is an indicator of milk consumption - see any "Got Milk" ad] [The 2 studies quoted in the Harvard article gave a higher risk factor 3.5 to 4.5 times over the base line for breast cancer.] Could bovine estrogens in milk affect the human immune system? Bovine insulin in milk has been implicated in Juvinile Diabetes- hmmmm. Ray Audette Author "NeanderThin" www.NeanderThin.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Breast Cancer and Diet
"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message
In the study, the two highest associations to breast cancer were sucrose intake and obesity. A previous study found an even higher risk This was also reported in The Harvard Women's Health watch: BMJ 2001;322:1566 ( 30 June ) News extra High bone density increases risk of breast cancer Scott Gottlieb New York Older women with high bone density are about twice as likely to develop breast cancer, a new study has found. These results add to existing evidence that suggests that older women who have low bone mass have a decreased risk of breast cancer and, conversely, that higher bone density is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Bone mineral density can be an accurate marker of the body's response to oestrogen, in that women with higher bone density are thought to be physiologically more sensitive to the hormone's effects than women with lower bone density. Because oestrogens have also been linked to risk of breast cancer, researchers in this study sought to determine if bone density might help also to predict the risk of breast cancer in older women. The study, led by Dr Jane Cauley of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, followed the health history of 8905 women who were 65 years or older and without breast cancer. After six years it found that the women who scored highest on three types of bone mineral density tests (performed on the bones of the wrist, arm, and heel) were also more likely to develop breast cancer (Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:930-936). During the six year period a total of 315 women (3.5%) developed breast cancer. After adjusting for other risk factors that contribute to breast cancer, such as age and obesity, the investigators found that the risk for women with the highest bone density for all three skeletal sites was 2.7 times greater than that for women with the lowest measurement of bone density for all three sites. "The results suggest that bone mineral density is one of the most powerful predictors of breast cancer, especially advanced breast cancer, among elderly women," Dr Cauley said. [ high bone density is an indicator of milk consumption - see any "Got Milk" ad] [The 2 studies quoted in the Harvard article gave a higher risk factor 3.5 to 4.5 times over the base line for breast cancer.] Could bovine estrogens in milk affect the human immune system? Bovine insulin in milk has been implicated in Juvinile Diabetes- hmmmm. Ray Audette Author "NeanderThin" www.NeanderThin.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Mary M - Ohio" wrote in message
In the study, the two highest associations to breast cancer were sucrose intake and obesity. A previous study found an even higher risk This was also reported in The Harvard Women's Health watch: BMJ 2001;322:1566 ( 30 June ) News extra High bone density increases risk of breast cancer Scott Gottlieb New York Older women with high bone density are about twice as likely to develop breast cancer, a new study has found. These results add to existing evidence that suggests that older women who have low bone mass have a decreased risk of breast cancer and, conversely, that higher bone density is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Bone mineral density can be an accurate marker of the body's response to oestrogen, in that women with higher bone density are thought to be physiologically more sensitive to the hormone's effects than women with lower bone density. Because oestrogens have also been linked to risk of breast cancer, researchers in this study sought to determine if bone density might help also to predict the risk of breast cancer in older women. The study, led by Dr Jane Cauley of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, followed the health history of 8905 women who were 65 years or older and without breast cancer. After six years it found that the women who scored highest on three types of bone mineral density tests (performed on the bones of the wrist, arm, and heel) were also more likely to develop breast cancer (Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:930-936). During the six year period a total of 315 women (3.5%) developed breast cancer. After adjusting for other risk factors that contribute to breast cancer, such as age and obesity, the investigators found that the risk for women with the highest bone density for all three skeletal sites was 2.7 times greater than that for women with the lowest measurement of bone density for all three sites. "The results suggest that bone mineral density is one of the most powerful predictors of breast cancer, especially advanced breast cancer, among elderly women," Dr Cauley said. [ high bone density is an indicator of milk consumption - see any "Got Milk" ad] [The 2 studies quoted in the Harvard article gave a higher risk factor 3.5 to 4.5 times over the base line for breast cancer.] Could bovine estrogens in milk affect the human immune system? Bovine insulin in milk has been implicated in Juvinile Diabetes- hmmmm. Ray Audette Author "NeanderThin" www.NeanderThin.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eating lots of carbs may raise breast cancer risk, study finds | marengo | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | August 6th, 2004 06:56 AM |
You want PROOF - Here's Quackery Proof. | marengo | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 173 | April 17th, 2004 11:26 PM |
Docs serve up diet surprise: Fat may help, soy may not stop cancer | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 3 | October 30th, 2003 10:13 PM |
Docs serve up diet surprise: Fat may help, soy may not stop cancer | Diarmid Logan | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 3 | October 30th, 2003 10:13 PM |
On "Weighing Obesity" | Steve Chaney, aka Papa Gunnykins ® | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 2 | September 24th, 2003 03:13 AM |