If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
Hi, people. As you know I've been struggling getting back on my
healthy low-calorie, WW-like diet again but wanted to do SOMETHING. So for the last 3 weeks I have been trying Atkins. I know, know. But I figured I needed to do something, and Atkins does at least curb cravings and help with blood sugar. So "in the meantime" I thought I would do that rather than continue to overeat myself into oblivion. I have been following Atkins to the letter. I even gave up all artificially sweetened zero calorie drinks just in case they were having an impact. I followed all their rules about getting 12 gm of veggie carbs in, drinking enough water, getting moderate exercise (walking) in, etc. And there have been some positive benefits, including no hunger or cravings problems, better blood sugar, slight improvement in cholesterol, more energy, easier concentration, and good digestion. My blood sugar in particular dramatically improved - dropping about 60 points. But the fact is I am gaining weight and it is absolutely, positively critical that I lose weight at a reasonable pace. I weigh TWICE what I should and I simply have to lose weight. My stomach fat is pushing up at my heart (you can see it in an X-ray) which is pushing up at my lungs which is giving me shortness of breath and the only way to resolve this is to lose weight at a reasonable pace. I'm not asking for miracles here, just a normal 2 lb or so a week weight loss, which is a perfectly safe and sane expectation for somebody who weighs as much as I do. Here are my first 22 day weights (in kg) on Atkins so you can see my concern: 1. 127.0 2. 126.4 3. 125.8 4. 126.0 5. 125.6 6. 125.4 7. 125.4 8. 124.2 9. 124.2 10. 124.4 11. 124.4 12. 124.2 13. 124.4 14. 125.0 15. 124.6 16. 124.8 17. 125.8 18. 125.6 19. 125.6 20. 125.4 21. 125.8 22. 126.2 The trend is clear. After a few days of relatively rapid weight loss, probably due to the dehydrating effect of a low-car diet, my weight is creeping up again. I also think the reason is clear. I am simply eating too many calories. All the butter, mayo, fried chicken skin, thin slices of fried pork (zero sugar bacon essentially) and all those things simply have lots and lots of calories and so I'm gaining weight. What other reasonable conclusion can I reach at this point? So I am now gearing up to doing something else. I still don't know if I can deal with the daily "points or calories" limit yet. And I didn't lose weight in the past on Core (renamed Filling Foods). So I am thinking right now of what my next step should be... doug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
at least you have your blood sugar down, and cravings have stopped. maybe
instead of freaking out think of "reasonable" protions, and start eliminating things like mayo, chicken skin, do that for a bit and see what happens, increase water when you start reducing these other things, and also maybe start journalling now so you are in the habit if you decide to return to calries, truth is doug, anything you do no matter how small in the right direction is an improvement, i mean, while you prefer to lose, not gaining is better than gaining, good luck and please post often, Lee "doug lerner" wrote in message ... Hi, people. As you know I've been struggling getting back on my healthy low-calorie, WW-like diet again but wanted to do SOMETHING. So for the last 3 weeks I have been trying Atkins. I know, know. But I figured I needed to do something, and Atkins does at least curb cravings and help with blood sugar. So "in the meantime" I thought I would do that rather than continue to overeat myself into oblivion. I have been following Atkins to the letter. I even gave up all artificially sweetened zero calorie drinks just in case they were having an impact. I followed all their rules about getting 12 gm of veggie carbs in, drinking enough water, getting moderate exercise (walking) in, etc. And there have been some positive benefits, including no hunger or cravings problems, better blood sugar, slight improvement in cholesterol, more energy, easier concentration, and good digestion. My blood sugar in particular dramatically improved - dropping about 60 points. But the fact is I am gaining weight and it is absolutely, positively critical that I lose weight at a reasonable pace. I weigh TWICE what I should and I simply have to lose weight. My stomach fat is pushing up at my heart (you can see it in an X-ray) which is pushing up at my lungs which is giving me shortness of breath and the only way to resolve this is to lose weight at a reasonable pace. I'm not asking for miracles here, just a normal 2 lb or so a week weight loss, which is a perfectly safe and sane expectation for somebody who weighs as much as I do. Here are my first 22 day weights (in kg) on Atkins so you can see my concern: 1. 127.0 2. 126.4 3. 125.8 4. 126.0 5. 125.6 6. 125.4 7. 125.4 8. 124.2 9. 124.2 10. 124.4 11. 124.4 12. 124.2 13. 124.4 14. 125.0 15. 124.6 16. 124.8 17. 125.8 18. 125.6 19. 125.6 20. 125.4 21. 125.8 22. 126.2 The trend is clear. After a few days of relatively rapid weight loss, probably due to the dehydrating effect of a low-car diet, my weight is creeping up again. I also think the reason is clear. I am simply eating too many calories. All the butter, mayo, fried chicken skin, thin slices of fried pork (zero sugar bacon essentially) and all those things simply have lots and lots of calories and so I'm gaining weight. What other reasonable conclusion can I reach at this point? So I am now gearing up to doing something else. I still don't know if I can deal with the daily "points or calories" limit yet. And I didn't lose weight in the past on Core (renamed Filling Foods). So I am thinking right now of what my next step should be... doug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
On Apr 9, 10:44*am, "Stormmee" wrote:
at least you have your blood sugar down, and cravings have stopped. maybe instead of freaking out think of "reasonable" protions, and start eliminating things like mayo, chicken skin, do that for a bit and see what happens, increase water when you start reducing these other things, and also maybe start journalling now so you are in the habit if you decide to return to calries, truth is doug, anything you do no matter how small in the right direction is an improvement, i mean, while you prefer to lose, not gaining is better than gaining, good luck and please post often, Lee Thanks, Lee. Yes, getting back to journaling - which I've been doing the last 3 weeks - is an important step for me. And what you say about cutting out the most outrageous things on Atkins, such as mayo, chicken skin, etc., might not only be helpful, but be sort of like WW "Filling Foods" but avoiding all the high- glycemic trigger foods on the WW list. Maybe the WW list needs to be poured over and some things removed (for me). I think they just tried to keep it simple by saying "all fruits" and "all veggies" even though some fruits and veggies clearly have different "sugar load" effects than others, and some can be very high calorie. If you eat strawberries, broccoli and spinach you are going to eat less calories and less carbs than if you eat bananas, corn and mashed pumpkin. But the "filling foods" lis treats them all the same way, which I think is odd. doug |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
"douglerner" wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 10:44 am, "Stormmee" wrote: at least you have your blood sugar down, and cravings have stopped. maybe instead of freaking out think of "reasonable" protions, and start eliminating things like mayo, chicken skin, do that for a bit and see what happens, increase water when you start reducing these other things, and also maybe start journalling now so you are in the habit if you decide to return to calries, truth is doug, anything you do no matter how small in the right direction is an improvement, i mean, while you prefer to lose, not gaining is better than gaining, good luck and please post often, Lee Thanks, Lee. Yes, getting back to journaling - which I've been doing the last 3 weeks - is an important step for me. And what you say about cutting out the most outrageous things on Atkins, such as mayo, chicken skin, etc., might not only be helpful, but be sort of like WW "Filling Foods" but avoiding all the high- glycemic trigger foods on the WW list. Maybe the WW list needs to be poured over and some things removed (for me). I think they just tried to keep it simple by saying "all fruits" and "all veggies" even though some fruits and veggies clearly have different "sugar load" effects than others, and some can be very high calorie. If you eat strawberries, broccoli and spinach you are going to eat less calories and less carbs than if you eat bananas, corn and mashed pumpkin. But the "filling foods" lis treats them all the same way, which I think is odd. doug ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well bananas, corn & mashed pumpkin, even though higehr than strawberries, broccoli and spinach are still a good ratio of nutrition to calories for most people. Those of us who count points find that the points keeps us from going overboard on the bananas, corn & mashed pumpkin. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
"douglerner" wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 10:44 am, "Stormmee" wrote: at least you have your blood sugar down, and cravings have stopped. maybe instead of freaking out think of "reasonable" protions, and start eliminating things like mayo, chicken skin, do that for a bit and see what happens, increase water when you start reducing these other things, and also maybe start journalling now so you are in the habit if you decide to return to calries, truth is doug, anything you do no matter how small in the right direction is an improvement, i mean, while you prefer to lose, not gaining is better than gaining, good luck and please post often, Lee **** "Thanks, Lee. Yes, getting back to journaling - which I've been doing the last 3 weeks - is an important step for me. And what you say about cutting out the most outrageous things on Atkins, such as mayo, chicken skin, etc., might not only be helpful, but be sort of like WW "Filling Foods" but avoiding all the high- glycemic trigger foods on the WW list." **** ** What are the high glycemic trigger food on the WW list? I'm really curious to know. **** Maybe the WW list needs to be poured over and some things removed (for me). I think they just tried to keep it simple by saying "all fruits" and "all veggies" even though some fruits and veggies clearly have different "sugar load" effects than others, and some can be very high calorie. ***** **You ate: "All the butter, mayo, fried chicken skin, thin slices of fried pork (zero sugar bacon essentially) and all those things..." (quoted from your post) while trying to get back on track, but won't eat some fruits and veggies because they have too many calories?Bacon has high calories, no nutrition, no staying power. Avocado are high -ish calories, lots of staying power, full of nutrition... **** If you eat strawberries, broccoli and spinach you are going to eat less calories and less carbs than if you eat bananas, corn and mashed pumpkin. But the "filling foods" lis treats them all the same way, which I think is odd. ***** **Because they are worth the calories. They are full of nutritional values will keep you from getting hungry quickly. That's the whole point, eating the right foods in the right quantities. If I eat pumkin, I'll be filled with less than if I eat let say chips. To come back to the avocado, compared to the strawberries it takes a lot more strawberries to be satisfied (as in not hungry anymore) than it does avocado. I'll sit and eat 1+ cups of strawberries. a serving of avocado is 1/4 of an avocado. Again Doug, it's all or nothing, bacon, fried chicken, butter and mayo... or no pumpkin, banana, avocado because they have too many calories.. that doens't make sense to me. Maybe if you let yourself eat bananas, and pumpkin, and grains, the fatty stuff won't be calling your name so much. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
only you know your body, i have no problem with corn, peas or bananas, but
if i eat potatoes the starch crave is on, Lee "douglerner" wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 10:44 am, "Stormmee" wrote: at least you have your blood sugar down, and cravings have stopped. maybe instead of freaking out think of "reasonable" protions, and start eliminating things like mayo, chicken skin, do that for a bit and see what happens, increase water when you start reducing these other things, and also maybe start journalling now so you are in the habit if you decide to return to calries, truth is doug, anything you do no matter how small in the right direction is an improvement, i mean, while you prefer to lose, not gaining is better than gaining, good luck and please post often, Lee Thanks, Lee. Yes, getting back to journaling - which I've been doing the last 3 weeks - is an important step for me. And what you say about cutting out the most outrageous things on Atkins, such as mayo, chicken skin, etc., might not only be helpful, but be sort of like WW "Filling Foods" but avoiding all the high- glycemic trigger foods on the WW list. Maybe the WW list needs to be poured over and some things removed (for me). I think they just tried to keep it simple by saying "all fruits" and "all veggies" even though some fruits and veggies clearly have different "sugar load" effects than others, and some can be very high calorie. If you eat strawberries, broccoli and spinach you are going to eat less calories and less carbs than if you eat bananas, corn and mashed pumpkin. But the "filling foods" lis treats them all the same way, which I think is odd. doug |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
Maybe if you let yourself eat bananas, and pumpkin, and grains, the fatty stuff won't be calling your name so much. The fatty stuff isn't calling my name so much as they satisfy in a way that stops cravings. Bananas, for example, are only about 80 calories each (don't know how many Flex points they are). The problem with the Filling Foods list though it doesn't take into account that bananas have a very high glycemic index. So while a banana or two aren't bad for a diet, for a person with high blood sugar it means the sudden introduction of so much sugar in a short amount of time releases a lot of insulin and then sparks cravings for other foods. In other words, for people in the situation I'm in, bananas aren't so much filling and satisfying as they are appetite triggers. All I'm saying is that the WW list doesn't distinguish well between high glycemic trigger foods and foods that aren't trigger foods. And I'm also saying that "one size doesn't fit all." Different people have different trigger foods. doug |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
douglerner wrote:
Maybe if you let yourself eat bananas, and pumpkin, and grains, the fatty stuff won't be calling your name so much. The fatty stuff isn't calling my name so much as they satisfy in a way that stops cravings. Bananas, for example, are only about 80 calories each (don't know how many Flex points they are). The problem with the Filling Foods list though it doesn't take into account that bananas have a very high glycemic index. So while a banana or two aren't bad for a diet, for a person with high blood sugar it means the sudden introduction of so much sugar in a short amount of time releases a lot of insulin and then sparks cravings for other foods. In other words, for people in the situation I'm in, bananas aren't so much filling and satisfying as they are appetite triggers. All I'm saying is that the WW list doesn't distinguish well between high glycemic trigger foods and foods that aren't trigger foods. And I'm also saying that "one size doesn't fit all." Different people have different trigger foods. doug The good thing with WW is that it's easy to tickle it to fit when you have special dietry needs. DH is Type 1 (insulin dependant), and our WW food style suits his need for complex carbs very well. Some recipes and menus lack sufficient complex carbs for his needs, but as he's a bloke and has more points available, I just serve him a slightly larger portion. Same for the growing lad (now Giant Mutant Ninja Teenager, at 5'11" with 40" chest and 36" waist! 14 and still growing, God help us!). The low fat and lots of veg suits us too, and I can also tweak to let me have a low wheat diet. Hm... Why do BOILED spuds have a lower GI than baked spuds? Is it to do with the length of cooking time, the lower water content due to cooking dry, a combination, or summat else entirely? And what about potato wedges, oven baked with very little oil? They get a far shorter oven time than whole jacket spuds. -- Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.katedicey.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
douglerner wrote:
Maybe if you let yourself eat bananas, and pumpkin, and grains, the fatty stuff won't be calling your name so much. The fatty stuff isn't calling my name so much as they satisfy in a way that stops cravings. Bananas, for example, are only about 80 calories each (don't know how many Flex points they are). The problem with the Filling Foods list though it doesn't take into account that bananas have a very high glycemic index. Have you looked at Zone? It may suit your needs very well. The balance of lean protein, low glycemic index carbs and small amount of good fat is supposed to leave you satisfied and feeling fantastic. So while a banana or two aren't bad for a diet, for a person with high blood sugar it means the sudden introduction of so much sugar in a short amount of time releases a lot of insulin and then sparks cravings for other foods. In other words, for people in the situation I'm in, bananas aren't so much filling and satisfying as they are appetite triggers. All I'm saying is that the WW list doesn't distinguish well between high glycemic trigger foods and foods that aren't trigger foods. And I'm also saying that "one size doesn't fit all." Different people have different trigger foods. doug |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
My 3 week experiment with Atkins
no expert here but i think the boiled removes some of the starch, Lee
"Kate XXXXXX" wrote in message et... douglerner wrote: Maybe if you let yourself eat bananas, and pumpkin, and grains, the fatty stuff won't be calling your name so much. The fatty stuff isn't calling my name so much as they satisfy in a way that stops cravings. Bananas, for example, are only about 80 calories each (don't know how many Flex points they are). The problem with the Filling Foods list though it doesn't take into account that bananas have a very high glycemic index. So while a banana or two aren't bad for a diet, for a person with high blood sugar it means the sudden introduction of so much sugar in a short amount of time releases a lot of insulin and then sparks cravings for other foods. In other words, for people in the situation I'm in, bananas aren't so much filling and satisfying as they are appetite triggers. All I'm saying is that the WW list doesn't distinguish well between high glycemic trigger foods and foods that aren't trigger foods. And I'm also saying that "one size doesn't fit all." Different people have different trigger foods. doug The good thing with WW is that it's easy to tickle it to fit when you have special dietry needs. DH is Type 1 (insulin dependant), and our WW food style suits his need for complex carbs very well. Some recipes and menus lack sufficient complex carbs for his needs, but as he's a bloke and has more points available, I just serve him a slightly larger portion. Same for the growing lad (now Giant Mutant Ninja Teenager, at 5'11" with 40" chest and 36" waist! 14 and still growing, God help us!). The low fat and lots of veg suits us too, and I can also tweak to let me have a low wheat diet. Hm... Why do BOILED spuds have a lower GI than baked spuds? Is it to do with the length of cooking time, the lower water content due to cooking dry, a combination, or summat else entirely? And what about potato wedges, oven baked with very little oil? They get a far shorter oven time than whole jacket spuds. -- Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.katedicey.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My Little Experiment | Nunya B. | General Discussion | 15 | August 23rd, 2005 09:00 PM |
Experiment | Marsha | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 27 | August 3rd, 2004 01:38 AM |
Reporter's 3 months Atkins experiment | Ada Ma | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 47 | July 29th, 2004 09:45 PM |
Atkins One Week In ! | John V | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | May 15th, 2004 04:15 PM |
An interesting experiment | Stuart Pedazzo | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 20 | February 23rd, 2004 03:38 PM |