A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

low carb diets, not necessarily



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th, 2008, 01:47 AM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default low carb diets, not necessarily

It's one thing to say low carb but really it's low "bad" carbs are
what you really want to do. Don't forget about the good carbs. That's
what you are going to eat to fill you like lettuce, green beans,
broccoli. All your green vegetables are wonderful for you and they
are really carbohydrates! It's the starch you need you be concerned
about. Years ago, it was thought that you should eat bread before more
fatty foods which is absolutely the wrong thing to do.You will never
be full without carbs, the good ones and they are practically no
calories to fill you. Don't you agree?
  #2  
Old August 5th, 2008, 03:29 AM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
DB[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 149
Default low carb diets, not necessarily


wrote in

You will never
be full without carbs, the good ones and they are practically no
calories to fill you. Don't you agree?


Yes I agree, only if they are covered with melted cheese! :-)


  #3  
Old August 5th, 2008, 03:53 AM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
Doug Freyburger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,866
Default low carb diets, not necessarily

wrote:

It's one thing to say low carb but really it's low "bad" carbs are
what you really want to do. Don't forget about the good carbs. That's
what you are going to eat to fill you like lettuce, green beans,
broccoli. *All your green vegetables are wonderful for you and they
are really carbohydrates! *It's the starch you need you be concerned
about.


Given that you virtually quoted from every low carb book out
there after your first sentence what's the point of agreeing or
disagreeing? It's not about saying low carb or not. It's about
following the directions in the book. You wrote your message
like you haven't read any of the standards in the field.

Years ago, it was thought that you should eat bread before more
fatty foods which is absolutely the wrong thing to do.


Yup. I never got the point of that. I tried it and discovered
it was nonsense.

You will never be full without carbs,


Utterly false. Have you ever even eaten a steak?

the good ones and they are practically no
calories to fill you.


Straight from every popular low carb book.
  #4  
Old August 5th, 2008, 05:20 AM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
DB[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 149
Default low carb diets, not necessarily


"Doug Freyburger" wrote in

You will never be full without carbs,


Utterly false. Have you ever even eaten a steak?

the good ones and they are practically no
calories to fill you.


Straight from every popular low carb book.
--------------------------

Fat fills you faster and last longer too!

Fat keeps you from gorging on more calories than you need as well, so the
end result is you eat less calories than if you were on a high carb way of
life.





  #5  
Old August 5th, 2008, 06:31 AM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
DevilsPGD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default low carb diets, not necessarily

In message "DB"
wrote:

"Doug Freyburger" wrote in

You will never be full without carbs,


Utterly false. Have you ever even eaten a steak?


Or a well prepared pork chop. Mmmm, pork chops.
  #6  
Old August 5th, 2008, 09:07 PM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
Kaz Kylheku
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default low carb diets, not necessarily

On 2008-08-05, wrote:
It's one thing to say low carb but really it's low "bad" carbs are
what you really want to do. Don't forget about the good carbs. That's
what you are going to eat to fill you like lettuce, green beans,
broccoli. All your green vegetables are wonderful for you and they
are really carbohydrates! It's the starch you need you be concerned
about.


I eat rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Mostly short-grained white Japanese
rice, with some genmai (Japanese brown rice) mixed in.

I am quite slim. For the past four years, though my body fat level has
had its little fluctuations, I have always been able to see at least the
general outline of my abs.

That's because I have not deceived myself into thinking that I can eat
arbitrary quantities of food, just as long as it is free of some ``evil''
ingredient.

Years ago, it was thought that you should eat bread before more
fatty foods which is absolutely the wrong thing to do.


Overeating is the wrong thing to do.

If you like bread, there is no reason to deny yourself.

Just don't consume calories at a faster rate than you are able to burn.

You will never be full without carbs


Protein is the most satisfying food, followed by carbs, and fat in third place.
Protein has a small number of calories, effectively. When you take into account
its processing cost, it only has less than 3 kcal per gram. Protein-rich foods
are not calorie-dense either by weight or volume (other than perhaps refined
protein). This means you can eat a very large quantity of high-protein food
that is low in fat. If you tried to get all your daily calories from protein
alone, not only would you not have trouble staying full, you'd have to gorge.

Oh, and excess protein turns to glucose; by eating enough protein, you are not
denying your brain and muscles of premium fuel, as the anti-protein nutcases
claim, and protein is not harmful to healthy kidneys.

the good ones and they are practically no
calories to fill you. Don't you agree?


Some ``good'' carbs do have plenty of calories.

Though, of course, no vegetable or seed in its natural state is ever quite as
calorie-dense as dry, refined carbohydrate (sugar, refined starch,
maltodextrin, etc), some ``good'' carbs do pack plenty of calories from
carbohydrate.
  #7  
Old August 5th, 2008, 09:25 PM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
Kaz Kylheku
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default low carb diets, not necessarily

On 2008-08-05, DB wrote:

"Doug Freyburger" wrote in

You will never be full without carbs,


Utterly false. Have you ever even eaten a steak?

the good ones and they are practically no
calories to fill you.


Straight from every popular low carb book.
--------------------------

Fat fills you faster and last longer too!

Fat keeps you from gorging on more calories than you need as well, so the
end result is you eat less calories than if you were on a high carb way of
life.


Though it's ultimately about calories, I've never seen anyone with a halfway
wortwhile body advocate ad lib high-fat eating.

Fat is the most calorie-dense, least filling food. In food, fat is usually
found in its dense form. A tiny quantity of fat has an astonishing number of
calories, yet you would hardly notice consuming it.

Among protein, carbs and fat, the processing of fat incurs the smallest energy
cost, too; dietary fat converts to adipose fat more easily than carbs of
protein.

If you can control your caloric intake on a high fat diet, and maintain a
nicely defined beach body, kudos to your superhuman self-discipline.
  #9  
Old August 6th, 2008, 02:19 AM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
Kaz Kylheku
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default low carb diets, not necessarily

On 2008-08-05, jcderkoeing wrote:

"Kaz Kylheku" wrote in message
...
On 2008-08-05, wrote:

I eat rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Mostly short-grained white
Japanese
rice, with some genmai (Japanese brown rice) mixed in.


So why are you participating in a low carb newsgroup?


This is a discussion group where everyone is entitled to his opinion,
provided it is on topic.

If you want to create an idelogical ground where dissenting opinions are
suppressed, set up your own forum on your own server somewhere, or a site which
gives you the controls to suppress opposition to your dogma. On Usenet, all
we have your personal kill file.

Not that it matters, but my eating rice doesn't prove that I'm not eating
low-carb; people eat as much as 100g per day and claim to be low-carbing.

Nobody has elected you king of Usenet, nor the keeper of the definition of
low-carb.

Have you always been an idiot or is this something you've worked on?


An idiot is someone who thinks that food energy can just disappear into another
dimension.

Or someone who keeps ``dieting'' for years, is still a fat, and claims that
it's not only working for him, but actually feels comfortable evangelizing the
nonworking approach to others!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bibliograph of Low-Carb studies? (was: Why Do Scientists Refuse to Recommend Lower-Carb Diets for Diabetes?) John101 Low Carbohydrate Diets 5 January 28th, 2008 05:12 PM
Possible Benefits of LDL Cholesterol -- It Isn't Necessarily AllBad Jim Low Carbohydrate Diets 4 January 11th, 2008 06:03 PM
Comparison of isocaloric very low carb/high sat fat and high carb/low sat fat diets on body composition and cardio risk Roger Zoul Low Carbohydrate Diets 2 January 31st, 2006 06:05 PM
Low Carb Diets Really Low Calorie Diets John WIlliams Low Carbohydrate Diets 27 October 7th, 2004 10:19 PM
Low Carb Diets Really Low Calorie Diets John WIlliams General Discussion 24 October 7th, 2004 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.