A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which is worse: fat or muscle?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 3rd, 2004, 01:19 PM
Bob Day
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?

Which is worse for your heart: a pound of unneeded
fat or a pound of unneeded muscle?

-- Bob Day


  #2  
Old July 3rd, 2004, 09:32 PM
Heywood Mogroot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?

"Bob Day" wrote in message ...
Which is worse for your heart: a pound of unneeded
fat or a pound of unneeded muscle?


interesting question, but in my experience a pound of muscle adds
strength, resulting in a more efficient physiology, while a pound of
fat is deadweight subtracting strength.

My brother-in-law is a big weightlifter -- around 230lbs, and when I
peaked at 232 I'd say his muscle mass was a lot healthier than my fat,
pound for pound.

Heywood

232/192/182
  #3  
Old July 4th, 2004, 08:52 AM
geoff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?

Unless, of course, the famine hits, then fat is better . . .

-g


"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
om...
"Bob Day" wrote in message

...
Which is worse for your heart: a pound of unneeded
fat or a pound of unneeded muscle?


interesting question, but in my experience a pound of muscle adds
strength, resulting in a more efficient physiology, while a pound of
fat is deadweight subtracting strength.

My brother-in-law is a big weightlifter -- around 230lbs, and when I
peaked at 232 I'd say his muscle mass was a lot healthier than my fat,
pound for pound.

Heywood

232/192/182



  #4  
Old July 5th, 2004, 12:17 AM
Mary M - Ohio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?

"Heywood Mogroot" wrote in message
om...
My brother-in-law is a big weightlifter -- around 230lbs, and when I
peaked at 232 I'd say his muscle mass was a lot healthier than my fat,
pound for pound.

Heywood


But you might have had the same BMI number! That's why I think BMI (body mass index)
numbers are screwed up. My trainer who has a perfect physique is considered "obese"
by BMI standards.

Mary M


  #5  
Old July 5th, 2004, 03:13 PM
Phil M.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?

One dark day on Usenet, "Mary M - Ohio"
said :

My trainer who has a perfect physique is considered "obese"
by BMI standards.


I agree that BMI can be way off for certain individuals. The only true test
is to have your body fat percentage clinically measured. BTW, what is a
perfect physique? Perfect from an aesthetical view?

Phil M.

--
If you can empty your own boat
Crossing the river of the world,
No one will oppose you,
No one will seek to harm you. -Chuang Tzu
  #6  
Old July 6th, 2004, 12:21 AM
Heywood Mogroot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?

"Phil M." wrote in message ...
One dark day on Usenet, "Mary M - Ohio"
said :

My trainer who has a perfect physique is considered "obese"
by BMI standards.


I agree that BMI can be way off for certain individuals. The only true test
is to have your body fat percentage clinically measured. BTW, what is a
perfect physique? Perfect from an aesthetical view?


more like ergonomical view mayhaps
  #7  
Old July 7th, 2004, 02:04 PM
Mary M - Ohio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?


"Phil M." wrote in message
...
One dark day on Usenet, "Mary M - Ohio"
said :
I agree that BMI can be way off for certain individuals. The only true test
is to have your body fat percentage clinically measured. BTW, what is a
perfect physique? Perfect from an aesthetical view?


Yes, purely a subjective view too. :-)

Mary


  #8  
Old July 7th, 2004, 02:04 PM
Mary M - Ohio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is worse: fat or muscle?


"Phil M." wrote in message
...
One dark day on Usenet, "Mary M - Ohio"
said :
I agree that BMI can be way off for certain individuals. The only true test
is to have your body fat percentage clinically measured. BTW, what is a
perfect physique? Perfect from an aesthetical view?


Yes, purely a subjective view too. :-)

Mary


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Article: The TRUTH About Low Carb Diets by Keith Klein Steve General Discussion 24 June 7th, 2004 09:05 PM
Carbohydrates offer some help in muscle protein synthesis, but not enough for the desired effect Diarmid Logan General Discussion 152 February 29th, 2004 08:53 PM
Carbohydrates offer some help in muscle protein synthesis, but not enough for the desired effect Diarmid Logan Low Carbohydrate Diets 117 February 29th, 2004 08:53 PM
Weight training Marsha Low Carbohydrate Diets 19 December 7th, 2003 02:19 PM
Muscleblitz Secrets to Maximum Muscle and Maximum Fat Loss dave welton Weightwatchers 0 November 14th, 2003 10:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.