If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will
be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
Lesanne:
High 150s sounds like a good weight goal to me. WTG Lesanne!! -- Cheers, Connie Walsh 241.5/205/155 RAFL 210.5/205/198.5 Lesanne wrote: My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say).
Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size or bone density or????? What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination? And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it down "thar?" On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
And you know what, the fact that you quit wanting to lose to 155 might make
you go there. -- Nathalie from Belgium 134.1/101.4/minigoal 99.9 Goal 68 Kg 295.6/223.5/minigoal 220.3/Goal 150 pounds RAFL 105.3/101.4/96 Kg 232/223.5/212 lbs "Lesanne" wrote in message ... My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote: If you feel good stay where you are. Unrealistic goals that are impossible to attain just wreck self-esteem. You've come a very long way, and you need to be proud of your accomplishments. A BF of 19 is AMAZING!!! You're my hero! Lynne My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats it",
that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157 this morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle mass, and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am done. Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has done a fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And the way I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below where I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting at the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still clearly see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and sex (there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me (lets not get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care to totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as close to 157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but whatever. She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there. Lesanne 365/160/157 "Fred" wrote in message ... A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say). Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size or bone density or????? What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination? And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it down "thar?" On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
It could happen, got back to 157.5 this morning.
"Nathalie W" wrote in message ... And you know what, the fact that you quit wanting to lose to 155 might make you go there. -- Nathalie from Belgium 134.1/101.4/minigoal 99.9 Goal 68 Kg 295.6/223.5/minigoal 220.3/Goal 150 pounds RAFL 105.3/101.4/96 Kg 232/223.5/212 lbs "Lesanne" wrote in message ... My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
I am a happy camper this morning. I think that history does make some
difference. I used to be quite happy at 200 and thought I would stay there. Compared to 365, it was truly much better. Compared to now, no contest. I really think I need to accept this as the spot and learn to modify the mood swings instead of my size "Lynne" wrote in message ... On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: If you feel good stay where you are. Unrealistic goals that are impossible to attain just wreck self-esteem. You've come a very long way, and you need to be proud of your accomplishments. A BF of 19 is AMAZING!!! You're my hero! Lynne My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
Interesting info. All of it including Bob Greene forcing you to make
a choice (G) Now, how do you pronounce Y Ya? I think the famished is probably a good indication that the body needs more food. But then again, I would have said that at a HIGHER weight since I still somewhat believe those damn little fat cells are secreting hormones demanding to be fed again!!!?????? That would cause the resultant demand for food???? I'm in hover mode now - up a fraction, down a fraction. I like it here, too just around 158 or so. At least, the way I feel biking and skiing.... Sardines (second course) are calling.... On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:01:50 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: Loosely translated y Ya, means "and whatever" "and so on" "and thats it", that kind of thing. I am a happy camper my own scale is back to 157 this morning. The leader thinks 155 is not realistic because of my muscle mass, and the size I am right now, as in measurements. She thinks I am done. Also, I do still have enough skin to cover 365 pounds although it has done a fabulous job of shrinking up, It doesn't flake off or anything. And the way I tend to get Ferociously hungry and feel weak when I try to get below where I am right now. My bone structure is fairly average, but I began weightlifting while I was still in the mid 250's and I was not dieting at the time. I have lost some of the muscle mass, but you can still clearly see quite a bit of it here and there, particularly in my quads and my shoulders. Bob Greene uses height, age, weight, waist measurement and sex (there was no place for "no" in the sex choices so I went with F for failing). My waist measurement is 29 inches. Also, the top of me (lets not get too specific) still has two rather large weights that I don't care to totally lose, they give the body some shape. Y Ya. Gonna stick as close to 157 as I can. She does not think that is realistic either, but whatever. She thinks the 164 goal is good. But I am not going there. Lesanne 365/160/157 "Fred" wrote in message .. . A MAINTAIN below GOAL is a GOOD THING (as Martha would say). Mind if I ask why the leader thought 155 was not realistic? Bone size or bone density or????? What does that Bob Greene site use to make that determination? And is that "y Ya?" And if so, what does it mean when they say it down "thar?" On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
RAFL Oh whatever
Modifying my size is proving to be MUCH easier than modifying my mood
swings. When you get that one figured out, let us know. In the meantime, I'm carrying on with strength training and aerobic exercise. Activity seems to fatigue Sybil/Eve/Jasmine/Tawanda/et al. It hasn't been this quiet in a long time. LOL Prairie Roots On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:41:33 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: I am a happy camper this morning. I think that history does make some difference. I used to be quite happy at 200 and thought I would stay there. Compared to 365, it was truly much better. Compared to now, no contest. I really think I need to accept this as the spot and learn to modify the mood swings instead of my size "Lynne" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:24:42 GMT, "Lesanne" wrote: If you feel good stay where you are. Unrealistic goals that are impossible to attain just wreck self-esteem. You've come a very long way, and you need to be proud of your accomplishments. A BF of 19 is AMAZING!!! You're my hero! Lynne My average for the week was 160. At least I am fairly sure next week will be a loss. My leader at my meeting (where I was at 159.5) said that it is probably not realistic for me to try to get to 155 anyway. I put my measurements into a site that Bob Greene has up, and came out with "athletic" category at 19. something percent body fat. I am going to quit trying to lose more and just concentrate on staying in the high one fifties, y Ya as they say here |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAFL wk 3/THTP wk 7 - Laura (LJ) | Laura | Weightwatchers | 47 | February 3rd, 2004 07:34 AM |
Post your results here! RafL wk 2 & THTP wk 5 | Amberle3 | Weightwatchers | 35 | January 19th, 2004 02:19 PM |
RAFL & THTP Laura(LJ) | Laura | Weightwatchers | 9 | January 19th, 2004 06:10 AM |
RAFL Week 1 I LOST! | Billie Severy | Weightwatchers | 8 | January 19th, 2004 06:08 AM |
Time to 'fess up - RAFL | Nathalie W | Weightwatchers | 17 | January 15th, 2004 08:17 PM |