A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps -only that the majority ignored it (JP)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 23rd, 2008, 04:05 AM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps -only that the majority ignored it (JP)

Present official science tells us wrongly that time flows around us in
a continuous manner - like water flows in a river around a motionless
stone. However, the "theory of everything" called the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity teaches us that time stands still while we move
through time in fast jumps - similarly like in fast jumps used to move
single frames of film over motionless cinema screens. Exists also a
physical evidence (proof) well known to almost everyone, which
visually illustrates that time really moves in jumps. This proof, as
well as its significance, I am going to remind here. After all, if
time really flows in jumps, then it is possible (and relatively easy)
to travel in time and to shift time back. In turn, if we learn how to
shift time back, then we also learn how we can live forever through
the repetitive shifting ourselves - after reaching an old age, back to
time of our youth.

The existence of ability to shift time back and to build time vehicles
is described on the totaliztic web page "timevehicle.htm" - about the
work of time, time travel, and about time vehicles. The "theory of
everything" called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity (described in more
details on the totaliztic web page "dipolar_gravity.htm") defines time
as the "passage of execution control through the natural program that
controls our life". (More exact explanation how this execution control
passes through natural programs of our life is provided in subsections
N1.5 and N1.4 from volume 11 of monograph [1/5] disseminated free of
charge from the totaliztic web page "text_1_5.htm".) According to this
definition, time is simply a sequence of discrete commands in the
program of our life. In turn, being such a sequence of commands, time
can be shifted forward or backward, skipped through, slowed down or
accelerated, etc. So according to the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(described in more details on the totaliztic web page
"dipolar_gravity.htm") travelling in time is possible, realistic, and
even quite easy.

Of course, if time is really a discrete program combined from a
sequence of individual commands, in which the execution control can be
shifted back or forth, then there must be some physical evidence which
documents this fact. As it turns out "one example of physical evidence
for the discrete nature of time, many amongst us saw with their own
eyes". This evidence is the interference that occurs between a
discrete pulses of time, and objects that flicker with the frequency
of completion of individual execution commands. The existence of this
interference proves that time does NOT flow continually, but it
elapses in fast jumps - like individual frames of film used to flow
through screens in old cinemas, or more strictly like the execution of
individual commands carried out in every long program. This proof can
be noticed with naked eyes - if one visually watches the gradual
acceleration of a wheel with spokes, so that the velocity of
flickering of these spokes changes from almost zero to around 1800
spokes/min (i.e. so that spokes flicker in the range from almost zero
to the frequency of around 30 Hz). (For example, the proof can be seen
on wheels of cars of motorbikes when these are accelerating while
driving parallel to our own car.) Namely, watching these spokes that
rotate increasingly faster, at the beginning we see in which direction
they are accelerating. But at some stage of their acceleration we are
going to notice, that these spokes look as if they stopped in their
rotation, and then they begin to make an impression that they begin to
rotate increasingly faster in an opposite direction than they really
rotate. The moment when these spokes look as if they stopped, is just
the moment when their frequency of flickering coincides with the
frequency of completion of individual commands in our programs of
life. In turn the fact that in our eyes these spokes seem to start the
rotation in an opposite direction, is a visual proof that the elapse
of time have a discrete nature (means that time elapses in jumps).
After all, if we analyse principles of this reversal rotation, then we
are going to realise, that nothing except of a discrete nature of time
can allow to form an impression of rotation of spokes in a direction
that is opposite to their actual direction of rotation. Thus the
actual existence of this phenomenon is another physical evidence for
the jumping (discrete) character of the elapse of time.
(So also another evidence for the correctness of the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity.)

Highly promising is also the awareness, that this physical proof for a
jumping (discrete) character of time provides us simultaneously with a
principle for measuring the speed of elapse of time in individual
people, as well as provides us with a first instrument for measuring
this speed. As the philosophy of totalizm (see descriptions of this
philosophy on web page "totalizm.htm") explains this, time does NOT
elapse with the same speed for every person and for every situation.
For example, this speed changes with age, thus e.g. for older people
time flows much faster than for youngsters. Also in situations that
release powerful feelings time clearly changes the speed of flow.
Therefore, if we construct a kind of propeller which is to measure
precisely for a given person the frequency (speed) of flickering at
which this person notices that the propeller apparently changes the
direction of rotation into an opposite one, then we obtain an
instrument for measuring the speed of elapse of time in individual
people. In turn measurements of this speed may lead people to shocking
discoveries, e.g. that some people are obese NOT because of their
genetics or amount of calories that they eat, but e.g. because their
day is much shorter than a day of slim people - thus some obese people
may have not enough time to burn all calories that they eat.

I do NOT intend to extend this post by proving here also that every
evidence for the elapse of time in small jumps, is simultaneously a
proof for the existence of God. After all, the reader should be able
to deduce by himself or herself, that time which elapses in jumps, and
thus which can be shifted backward, could be implemented only in case
when God does exist and thus when He intentionally designed time just
in such an extraordinary manner. After all, in order such a software
time could prevail in the physical world, God needed to build firstly
the structure, which on web pages "timevehicle.htm" (see in there
items #B6 and #D1) and "dipolar_gravity_pl.htm" (see in there item
#G4) is described under the name " timespace". Only when such a
software " timespace" exists and works, time can i flow in jumps - in
the manner described by the "theory of everything" called the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity. In turn to actually build such "timespace",
intelligent God must exist and must have the form of a huge natural
program - means the form which to God is attributed by the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity.

The explanations presented above are adopted from items #D2 of the
totaliztic web page "god_proof.htm", update of 23 October 2008, or
later. The latest update of this web page should be available from
several web sites of totalizm. One amongst these web sites is "
www.jan-pajak.com " - which is available under the address
http://jan-pajak.com/god_proof.htm and which always presents (just for
brief periods of time) the most recently updated web page of
totalizm.

It is also worth to know that practically all totaliztic web pages are
available at each address (server) of totalizm. Therefore
independently from the web page "evil.htm", each address (server)
linked from here should also offer all other web pages of totalizm -
unless some of these pages were sabotaged, or are so new that I had no
time yet to upload these at a given address (server). (But in a case
when for some reasons a page is unavailable under a given address,
still at this address a MENU should be available which has links to
other addresses (servers) of totalizm, on which a given web page
should already be accessible.) Thus, if someone wishes to view
descriptions from any other totaliztic web page, e.g. from a web page
listed in this post, or listed in other totaliztic posts, then in the
above addresses the name "evil.htm" is just enough to exchange for a
name of the web page that he or she wishes to view, e.g. for the name
of web page "oscillatory_chamber.htm", "eco_cars.htm", "boiler.htm",
"fe_cell.htm", "free_energy.htm", "telekinetics.htm",
"dipolar_gravity.htm", "nirvana.htm", "totalizm.htm", "evil.htm",
"god.htm", "god_proof.htm", "bible.htm", "evolution.htm",
"wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm", "malbork_uk.htm", "memorial.htm",
"newzealand.htm", "partia_totalizmu_uk.htm", "fruit.htm",
"text_1_5.htm", "explain.htm", "day26.htm", "ufo_proof.htm",
"katrina.htm", etc., etc.

If here the above text is difficult to read, or links from it refuse
to work, then it is worth to know that this post is repeated on
several blogs of totalizm, subsequent ones amongst which can be
accessed at following internet addresses:
http://www.getablog.net/totalizm
http://totalizm.wordpress.com
http://totalizm.blox.pl/html
http://totalizm.myblog.net
On these blogs it is also worth to read the previous post number #158E
(or previous thread http://groups.google.com/group/alt.r...1c6c03c46d3fb#
), which explains that the certainty of God's existence we must earn
with our own effort. Thus the content of the previous post complements
the content of this post.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak
  #2  
Old October 23rd, 2008, 05:59 AM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
John Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps - only that the majority ignored it (JP)

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:05:25 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Present official science tells us wrongly


Oh, great. *Another* cretinist crackpot who wouldn't know science if
it bit him on the arse is going to tell us why it's wrong.

**** off, Jan.

  #4  
Old October 23rd, 2008, 02:43 PM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
Ken[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps- only that the majority ignored it (JP)

On Oct 22, 8:05*pm, wrote: snipped mindless X-
posted rantings

Hate to tell ya dude, but the Nobel Prize Committee doesn't award
people for CCPIng
pseudoscience Bravo Sierra.

BTW gods don't exist now, have never existed and never will exist, no
matter how ya wanna measure time


  #5  
Old October 23rd, 2008, 11:44 PM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps- only that the majority ignored it (JP)

On Oct 24, 1:21*am, John J wrote:
....
I don't think the author ever saw real life - he describes everything,
for example the spokes of a wheel in motion, as if he's always in front
of a video.

....
I appears that you never saw the effect that I am describing here!
Where are you living - at the very top of ivory tower? (Do not seems
so - judging by the level of your contribution to this discussion!)
Well, the effect of visual changing the direction of rotation is well
known to everyone who ever had opportunity to watch an accelerating
spin of any object that makes flicker some parts of itself. I am
shocked that visibly no-many people seem to be able to recall it. So I
propose to make an experiemnt - and see it with your own eyes.
Anything that spins, that have some spokes or propellers, and that
accelerates gradually from zero to around 1800 rev/min (so that spokes
change their flickering from zero to around 30 Hz) will create this
effect. It is worth to see it, as it is a window to a "paradigm shift"
and opens our eyes on completely different prospects regarding the
nature of time and the possibility of time travel.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak

  #6  
Old October 24th, 2008, 03:58 AM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps - only that the majority ignored it (JP)

wrote:
On Oct 24, 1:21 am, John J wrote:
...
I don't think the author ever saw real life - he describes
everything, for example the spokes of a wheel in motion, as if he's
always in front of a video.

...
I appears that you never saw the effect that I am describing here!
Where are you living - at the very top of ivory tower? (Do not seems
so - judging by the level of your contribution to this discussion!)
Well, the effect of visual changing the direction of rotation is well
known to everyone who ever had opportunity to watch an accelerating
spin of any object that makes flicker some parts of itself. I am
shocked that visibly no-many people seem to be able to recall it. So I
propose to make an experiemnt - and see it with your own eyes.
Anything that spins, that have some spokes or propellers, and that
accelerates gradually from zero to around 1800 rev/min (so that spokes
change their flickering from zero to around 30 Hz) will create this
effect. It is worth to see it, as it is a window to a "paradigm shift"
and opens our eyes on completely different prospects regarding the
nature of time and the possibility of time travel.


What you are seeing is a frame per second illusion.
The direction of rotation never changes.
A good strobe light can make just about anything that is
rotating "seem" to spin backwards.


  #7  
Old October 24th, 2008, 01:39 PM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
John J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps- only that the majority ignored it (JP)


On Oct 24, 1:21 am, John J wrote:
...
I don't think the author ever saw real life - he describes
everything, for example the spokes of a wheel in motion, as if he's
always in front of a video.

...
I appears that you never saw the effect that I am describing here!
Where are you living - at the very top of ivory tower?


No. I have never seen that happen in ordinary daylight. I have seen it
in light that flickers, and of course in motion picture film, and from
some singleframed video. But never in natural light.

  #8  
Old October 25th, 2008, 02:45 AM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps- only that the majority ignored it (JP)

On Oct 25, 1:39*am, John J wrote:
....
No. I have never seen that happen in ordinary daylight. I have seen it
in light that flickers, and of course in motion picture film, and from
some singleframed video. But never in natural light.

....
Very strange that you never have seen it. Just a few hours ago I
induced this effect in a daylight with the use of a Wimshurst machine
that I have in my home. (You can see the photo of this machine on my
web pages, e.g. on the web page "newzealand.htm" - which you can find
e.g. at the address http://milicz.fateback.com/newzealand.htm or
http://ufonauci.w.interia.pl/newzealand.htm .) The machine is
propelled by hand so I can regulate the speed of rotation of its disk,
thus it allows seeing the effect that I am describing here quite
clearly. Probably I could see the same effect on spokes of my bicycle
- but I do NOT have one right now. But you probably have a bicycle -
so turn it on its back, place on the floor in front of you, and ask
someone to gradually speed up the hand rotation of pedals - while you
carefully watch in good daylight the flickering of spokes from the
back wheel. If you do NOT have a bicycle, then drive to a nearest
airport and watch aiplanes being started - you can see this effect in
daylight on propellers being started in propeller aircraft, or on
front turbines of jet engines. You only need to watch carefuly to see
it. If you have a farm nearby, look at any fast wheel that is
propelled by electric motor when it gradually starts running any heavy
farm machine - as electric motors also acomplish 1800 rev/min, thus
are going through this pehnomenon.

For this phenomenon to appear NO artificial light is needed. It
appears in daylight. In turn every stroboscopic lamp beaming pulses at
rotating objects just supplies us with the explanation why pulsating
time triggers this effect. After all, the discrete elapse of time is
just like pulses of the light emited by a stroboscopic lamp. They
allow us to see spinning objects only at small fractions of their
rotary motion. This is why the effect that I described here appears in
daylight on practically all spinning objects.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak

P.S. I am shocked that instead of helping me in my research, e.g. by
determing the exact frequency at which this effect appears, the only
response I encounter so-far is always criticism and denial. If people
help me since 1985, when I discovered how time works and thus invented
the operation of time vehicles, by today I would already build time
vehicles. In turn having such time vehicles would cause that YOU (the
reader) could shift back in time to your youth at any moment of time
whenever you wish - thus you would NOT need to die after reaching the
old age, but would live forever. Pity that so many people spend their
energy on holding me back in my research instead of helping me to
advance these research.

  #9  
Old October 25th, 2008, 03:13 AM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps - only that the majority ignored it (JP)

wrote:
snipped
P.S. I am shocked that instead of helping me in my research, e.g. by
determing the exact frequency at which this effect appears, the only
response I encounter so-far is always criticism and denial.


Dear jan,
The effect you are talking about is different for peoples views
because some people see at different frame rates.

Here is the real basics of it.
If you see at 30 frames per second and the wheel is spinning
at 30 rotations per second, if the are in sync, it will look like
the wheel is not spinning.
If you see at 30 frames per second and the wheel is spinning
at 29 revs per second, it will look as if the wheel is spinning
slowly backwards.

The effect will occur at multiples of the framerates it occurs
at for slower speeds.
It is simply a frame rate limitation of observation.
Time does not pass in jumps, in fact, time does not
"pass" at all, time was invented by humans as a counting method.
Time is an abstract of a motion being counted and nothing more
than such.

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Discoverer of the Clock Malfunction Fact.
Spaceman




  #10  
Old October 26th, 2008, 03:26 AM posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.religion,alt.talk.creationism,alt.support.diet
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Almost everyone saw the physical proof that time passes in jumps- only that the majority ignored it (JP)

On Oct 25, 3:13*pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
....
Dear jan,
The effect you are talking about is different for peoples views
because some people see at different frame rates.

Here is the real basics of it.
If you see at 30 frames per second and the wheel is spinning
at 30 rotations per second, if the are in sync, it will look like
the wheel is not spinning.
If you see at 30 frames per second and the wheel is spinning
at 29 revs per second, it will look as if the wheel is spinning
slowly backwards.

....
James M Driscoll Jr
Discoverer of the Clock Malfunction Fact.
Spaceman


YES, I agree with what you are saying above - after all time passes
differently for each person. For example, for older people time passes
faster than for young people. Thus each person is going to see this
interference of his or her "jumping" time with spinning objects at a
different frequency. Unfortunately, I do NOT have equipment to measure
how fast time passes for each category of people. This is why I am
asking for help - is there anyopne who could measure it.

Your explanation is known by people - on the same principle work
"stroboscopic lamps" when used e.g. for fine-tuning of cars. The point
is, however, that perople do NOT realise that when they see this
phenomenon in a daylight, e.g. while looking at propeller of an
airplane just being started, they actually see mechanism of time at
work. This is why I try to indicate to people that this phenomenon is
actually a visual proof, which every person can see with his or her
own eyes, and which reassures everyone that time is moving in jumps,
because time is a sequential motion of execution control through
individual commands from natural programs of our lives. This execution
control can be shifted backward thus allowing us to shift back in
time. The device which allows shifting time in backward is already
known - it is the so-called "Oscillatory Chamber of the third
generation" which is described on the totaliztic web page
"oscillatory_chamber.htm" - you can look at it e.g. at the address
http://milicz.fateback.com/oscillatory_chamber.htm . Should other
people do NOT concentrate their efforts in preventing me from building
this device, then since 1985 when I worked out the mechanism of time
and invented time vehicles, until today - 28 years later, I would
already completed these devices. In turn my time vehicles would help
people to defeat death and would allow us to live forever. (After all,
to live forever, it is enough to repetitively shift our time back to
years of youth each time we arrive at the old age.)

Someone said "seeing is believing" - unfortunately, as this is
illustrated by the proof for the elapse of time in jumps described
here, whoever said this surely was not familiar with present-day
worshippers of TV. After all, present worshippers of TV may see the
proof that time passes in short jumps, but are NOT going to believe
that this proof has any significance for their own lives. So they just
watch passively how Jan Pajak cries for help in building his time
vehicle.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The majority of the posters at the diet NGs are anorexic?!?!?! Willow Weightwatchers 1 September 7th, 2004 07:58 PM
Another Business Jumps on the Bandwagon FOB Low Carbohydrate Diets 0 January 16th, 2004 01:35 AM
TGI Fridays Restaurant jumps on the low carb bandwagon Rob S. Low Carbohydrate Diets 10 December 18th, 2003 03:49 AM
Report jumps to a conclusion Chakolate Low Carbohydrate Diets 2 October 23rd, 2003 08:58 PM
Chris - Rabbit Jumps! MH General Discussion 4 October 17th, 2003 03:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.