Wow

On Apr 12, 10:47 pm, Mu wrote:
On 12 Apr 2007 18:46:23 -0700,Seanwrote:

On Apr 11, 9:33 wrote:

Quit using exercise as a distraction, it's not going to work.

A deliberate act of sabotage. My, but there are a lot of trolls on
this newsgroup.

Sean

Haven't seen but a few, suggesting you are one?Muas troll?

Get your Google Groups out and check out my posting history. Then come
back,Muloves newbies with no clewbies.

HAHhaMuMake joke!

Oh, my point sticks, as is the Truth of what I said as follows:

"Bev, quit using exercise as a distraction, it's not going to work. You
have to deal straight up with the facts and the facts are that you see
food as best buddy, a companion, a time in each day to consume, a
ritual.

Food was given to us to sustain us not to entertain us (except when we
need to eat and can enjoy doing so)."

Looking forward to hearing back from you,Sean.

When I read your post I just decided to quit reading anything else
from you. But then when I was walking it occurred to me to tell you
that I would still read your posts if you wouldn't post so much. As it
is, I am far too busy and there aren't enough hours in a day to read
multipul postings of the same drivel over and over.

So I'll just be skipping over your stuff until the volume goes down.
Which I don't expect to happen.

Sean

PPPPPPPPPP LLL OOOOOOOOOOOO NNN NNN
KKK KKK
PPPPPPPPPP LLL OOOOOOOOOOOO NNNN NNN
KKK KKK
PPP PPP LLL OOO OOO
NNNNN NNN KKK KKK
PPP PPP LLL OOO OOO
NNNNNN NNN KKK KKK
PPP PPP LLL OOO OOO NNN
NNN NNN KKK KKK
PPPPPPPPPP LLL OOO OOO NNN NNN
NNN KKKKKK
PPPPPPPPPP LLL OOO OOO NNN NNN
NNN KKKKKK
PPP LLL OOO OOO NNN
NNN NNN KKKKKK
PPP LLL OOO OOO
NNN NNN NNN KKK KKK
PPP LLL OOO OOO
NNN NNNNNN KKK KKK
PPP LLLLLLLLLLL OOOOOOOOOOOO NNN NNNNN
KKK KKK
PPP LLLLLLLLLLL OOOOOOOOOOOO NNN NNNN
KKK KKK

In article writes:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 22:46:20 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

Well that is because the diet says "2PD". This rather vague diet does not
factor in the caloric content of foods, hence such questions.

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet. Instead, the Approach can be
used with any diet, which are instructions about **what** to eat and
not **how much** to eat.

"diet", OED definition #3:

Prescribed course of food, restricted in kind or limited in quantity,

--c ary

I'm not certain that the word diet isn't more in tune with control and
direction of specific foodstuffs and their eating. The 2PD is about
volume but I have to admit what Chung has evolved this to, I have not
kept up.

All I know is that when I found out, to my surprise, the volume of food
I was eating, reduced it, I lost weight.

I'm not sure why you found this surprising? Eat less: lose weight.
It's always worked for me.


-- cry

In article writes:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:42:01 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet. Instead, the Approach can be
used with any diet, which are instructions about **what** to eat and
not **how much** to eat.

"diet", OED definition #3:

Prescribed course of food, restricted in kind or limited in quantity,

There is no prescribed course of food with the 2PD-OMER Approach.

And of course everyone else understands that the act of
prescribing in the above phrase refers either to 1) prescribing
limits of kind, or 2) prescribing limits of amount.

-- cary

cary, you're being argumentative for what purpose?

Because Andrew always uses this imaginary distinction to
go into willfully disingenuous mode and thus avoid
questions or objections raised to his "diet.

OK, so wth, call it a diet?

Find with me. Not fine with Andrew.


-- cary

In article Mu writes:

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

Oh, let's just say that it has been suggested that nearly all of the
"participants" in Dr. Chung's study were the children of Israel,
wandering hither and yon (generally more yonly than hitherly)
all those years.

Suggested or factual?

If so, one can only wonder where Dr. Chung obtained all the
requisite information on the state of their health. All of their
healths.

-- cary

Why don't you ask him?

And of course I have -- curious, as you may imagine, how
one person, apparently working alone, could have carried out
what would easily be the largest single medical study
in history.

He was most unforthcoming.


-- cary


http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...1?dmode=source

In article Mu writes:

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

Oh, let's just say that it has been suggested that nearly all of the
"participants" in Dr. Chung's study were the children of Israel,
wandering hither and yon (generally more yonly than hitherly)
all those years.

Suggested or factual?

Once more, suggested or factual?

On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:34:40 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

If so, one can only wonder where Dr. Chung obtained all the
requisite information on the state of their health. All of their
healths.

-- cary

Why don't you ask him?

And of course I have -- curious, as you may imagine, how
one person, apparently working alone, could have carried out
what would easily be the largest single medical study
in history.

He was most unforthcoming.

-- cary

he said nothing, nothing at all?

On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:29:07 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

There is no prescribed course of food with the 2PD-OMER Approach.

And of course everyone else understands that the act of
prescribing in the above phrase refers either to 1) prescribing
limits of kind, or 2) prescribing limits of amount.

-- cary

cary, you're being argumentative for what purpose?

Because Andrew always uses this imaginary distinction to
go into willfully disingenuous mode and thus avoid
questions or objections raised to his "diet.

What? Chung has answered a zillion ?? regarding the 2PD. You're picking
nits, it's nonsensical for you to do so. It makes no difference what the
thing is called if in the end, it works. Which it does.

On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:27:11 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

I'm not certain that the word diet isn't more in tune with control and
direction of specific foodstuffs and their eating. The 2PD is about
volume but I have to admit what Chung has evolved this to, I have not
kept up.

All I know is that when I found out, to my surprise, the volume of food
I was eating, reduced it, I lost weight.

I'm not sure why you found this surprising? Eat less: lose weight.
It's always worked for me.

-- cry

What volume of food did you eat before and after losing wieght?

In article writes:


In article Mu writes:

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

Oh, let's just say that it has been suggested that nearly all of the
"participants" in Dr. Chung's study were the children of Israel,
wandering hither and yon (generally more yonly than hitherly)
all those years.

Suggested or factual?

Once more, suggested or factual?

As I've said once already: Chung won't tell.


-- cary

In article writes:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:34:40 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:

If so, one can only wonder where Dr. Chung obtained all the
requisite information on the state of their health. All of their
healths.

-- cary

Why don't you ask him?

And of course I have -- curious, as you may imagine, how
one person, apparently working alone, could have carried out
what would easily be the largest single medical study
in history.

He was most unforthcoming.

-- cary

he said nothing, nothing at all?

I provided a link for you. Go see for yourself.

--- cary