Wow

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:50:46 GMT, George wrote:

"Mu" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:34:22 -0400, I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!
wrote:

.....

i got pussy everywhere-damn chicks wont leave me alone.

That could mean you are rich, not good looking.

Maybe. But it's damn sure not due to his intellect.

Egads, you may be right!! lol

On Apr 12, 1:24 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article .com "Pastor Kutchie, Earthquack's nemesis" writes:



On Apr 12, 5:39 am, Mu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:14:40 -0800, Cubit wrote:
Your 2 pounds of Almonds is not very inspiring.

Cubit, Usenet history is chock full of people who have tried to disown
the Two Pound Diet (2PD) saying "Well I can eat two pounds of insert
chocolate, cement, fat, frogs, etc and never gain weight? Hogwash!"

The truth is that you or anyone else can cut their consumption gradually
to 2PD and the weight will come off and stay off.

You will get tired of almonds, candy, or whatever. Fat content will
moderate itself.

What do socks eat 908g a day of?

Oh, there's not a chance in the world that `Mu' is Andrew
socking about. The stylistic differences are WAY too
great.

Mu has an actual functioning sense of humor. Mu addresses
directly anything put to him. Mu does not invoke divine
backup for his own opinions. Mu has never presented
homebrew theological concepts. Mu does not imply that people
who become ill did so because they were not Christians.

And Mu most certainly has never posted anything
along the lines of "You do not have long to live",
or, "May LORD Almighty GOD put you out of
your misery soon" -- let alone something like
"At any moment, I could leave my walk with Christ and
ask our heavenly Father to annihilate you in Jesus' name
and it would be done, so be thankful that it remains my
choice to stick with the truth"

Mu does posts, not performance art.

-- cary

Is is possible that Mu/Chung are facets of a sick persons multiple
personality disorder?

Mu as poster vs. performance artist? I think of him more as a drive-by
shooter. Little commitment, large aggression, big ego, sense of
invincibility. Could Mu be a Blood or Crip?

In all honesty, I don't think Mu = Chung. I think they two individuals
deeply in love with each other and some infantile conception of a
higher power.

On Apr 12, 11:06 pm, "Father Haskell" wrote:
On Apr 12, 3:31 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
wrote:

brother Mu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:14:40 -0800, Cubit wrote:

Your 2 pounds of Almonds is not very inspiring.

Cubit, Usenet history is chock full of people who have tried to disown
the Two Pound Diet (2PD) saying "Well I can eat two pounds of insert
chocolate, cement, fat, frogs, etc and never gain weight? Hogwash!"

The truth is that you or anyone else can cut their consumption gradually
to 2PD and the weight will come off and stay off.

You will get tired of almonds, candy, or whatever. Fat content will
moderate itself.

2PD of asbestos insulation waste.

2 Lbs daily, canned whoop ass?

On 13 Apr 2007 07:42:02 -0700, Hollywood wrote:

Mu as poster vs. performance artist? I think of him more as a drive-by
shooter. Little commitment, large aggression, big ego, sense of
invincibility. Could Mu be a Blood or Crip?

I am amazed at how much you criticize Mu and how little you actually
know of Mu.

Wait, no I'm not.

In all honesty, I don't think Mu = Chung.

Put butter on that /waffle/, thanks.

I think they two individuals
deeply in love with each other and some infantile conception of a
higher power.

Let's get this accurate, for once, for one time in your posts about Mu.
Once.

There is no "higher power", I believe definitively and completely in God
who made His Presence known as Jesus Christ.

Note the lack of butter.

"Mu" wrote in message
.. .
On 13 Apr 2007 07:42:02 -0700, Hollywood wrote:

Mu as poster vs. performance artist? I think of him more as a drive-by
shooter. Little commitment, large aggression, big ego, sense of
invincibility. Could Mu be a Blood or Crip?

I am amazed at how much you criticize Mu and how little you actually
know of Mu.

Wait, no I'm not.

In all honesty, I don't think Mu = Chung.

Put butter on that /waffle/, thanks.

I think they two individuals
deeply in love with each other and some infantile conception of a
higher power.

Let's get this accurate, for once, for one time in your posts about Mu.
Once.

There is no "higher power", I believe definitively and completely in God
who made His Presence known as Jesus Christ.

then,you believe in nothing.

On Apr 13, 2:09 pm, Mu wrote:
On 13 Apr 2007 07:42:02 -0700, Hollywood wrote:

In all honesty, I don't think Mu = Chung.

Put butter on that /waffle/, thanks.

I don't get how a loose comment in your direction when I consistently
suggest that you and chung are lovers, is a real waffle. Let's suggest
it's not because you are low regard so I don't pay attention to what I
say to you.

I think they two individuals
deeply in love with each other and some infantile conception of a
higher power.

Let's get this accurate, for once, for one time in your posts about Mu.
Once.

There is no "higher power", I believe definitively and completely in God
who made His Presence known as Jesus Christ.

You believe in the Lord God, who is both powerful and above everyone.
That would be a higher power. And I contend that Chung's conception is
infantile. Your's is less forward, but no less infantile.

Note the lack of butter.

Butter is good for you. It's the carbs that are killing you, not the
sat fat.

"Cary Kittrell" wrote

Mu does posts, not performance art.

And you do...

--
Bob
http://www.kanyak.com

On Apr 8, 7:51 am, "Jeri" wrote:
A Ross wrote:
I'm not sure in all my years hanging out at ASD that I've seen the
traffic level this low...

What can we do to liven things up around here?

Have Caleb espouse the wonders of his 100 day diet?

Have Mu give whip us into shape?

Get Chung to give us nutrition and spiritual advice?

Or can we all check in and give an update as to where we are in terms
of our goals--whatever our goals may be?

Just a suggestion but it would be really good if everyone who's going to
give an update would post a new thread or at least change the subject line
to something like Update on me [was Wow]. Lots of people will read one
or two posts in a thread such as this and just assume the rest of the thread
contains more comments about low traffic and the death of the newsgroup.

Reports of death of the news group are greatly exaggerated. ASD has
always been a fertile feeding ground for trolls but has also always
survived.

Diva

"Mu" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:14:40 -0800, Cubit wrote:

Your 2 pounds of Almonds is not very inspiring.

Cubit, Usenet history is chock full of people who have tried to disown
the Two Pound Diet (2PD) saying "Well I can eat two pounds of insert
chocolate, cement, fat, frogs, etc and never gain weight? Hogwash!"

Well that is because the diet says "2PD". This rather vague diet does not
factor in the caloric content of foods, hence such questions.

The truth is that you or anyone else can cut their consumption gradually
to 2PD and the weight will come off and stay off.

Wouldn't a 1PD diet or a 1.5PD diet work better than the 2PD diet? Just
wondering...

satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
brother "Mu" wrote:
neighbor Cubit wrote:

Your 2 pounds of Almonds is not very inspiring.

Cubit, Usenet history is chock full of people who have tried to disown
the Two Pound Diet (2PD) saying "Well I can eat two pounds of insert
chocolate, cement, fat, frogs, etc and never gain weight? Hogwash!"

Well that is because the diet says "2PD". This rather vague diet does not
factor in the caloric content of foods, hence such questions.

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet. Instead, the Approach can be
used with any diet, which are instructions about **what** to eat and
not **how much** to eat.

The truth is that you or anyone else can cut their consumption gradually
to 2PD and the weight will come off and stay off.

Wouldn't a 1PD diet or a 1.5PD diet work better than the 2PD diet? Just
wondering...

The 2 pounds (16 oz + 16 oz as described by Exodus 16:16) is by GOD's
design to be the optimal amount. Any amount more or less would not be
optimal and we would be less hungry.

"HE humbled you making you hungry... to teach you that man does not
live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of the
LORD." -- Moses (Deuteronomy 8:3)

"Blessed are you who hunger now for you will be satisfied." -- LORD
Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)

Amen.

Marana tha

Prayerfully in Jesus' ever-lasting love,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

May HIS immortal brethren pray for our dying mortal friends and
neighbors:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

In memory of our dearly departed Bob(this one) Pastorio:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

The Official SMC FAQ List:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/TheTruth/FAQ