A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Total carb vs bioavailable carbs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 14th, 2003, 06:33 PM
Mxy Ptlyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Total carb vs bioavailable carbs

A long time ago, when I was beginning to get a handle on carb counting, I
got a formula to determine if the carbs listed on a label were the actual
bioavailable carbs. I believe I got that from someone in this group. What I
remember is you subtract the calories from fat and calories from protein
from the total calories on the label and divde the result by 4. If the
answer was the same as the carbs listed on the label then that was the
total bioavailable carbs. My question is, if indeed I did get the original
information here, what if the result is LESS than the nunber of carbs on
the label? For example, I have some peanuts that state on the label 6 g
carbs. Working the above formula I get an answer of 2.6 after dividing the
calorie difference by 4. Does that mean I should consder the peanuts to
have only 2.6 carbs per serving?

I must point out that on the vast majority of labels the difference between
the carbs listed and the result from the formula is the same.

Thanks,

Mxy
  #2  
Old November 16th, 2003, 12:47 PM
Mxy Ptlyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Total carb vs bioavailable carbs

Mxy Ptlyk wrote in
:

A long time ago, when I was beginning to get a handle on carb
counting, I got a formula to determine if the carbs listed on a label
were the actual bioavailable carbs. I believe I got that from someone
in this group. What I remember is you subtract the calories from fat
and calories from protein from the total calories on the label and
divde the result by 4. If the answer was the same as the carbs listed
on the label then that was the total bioavailable carbs. My question
is, if indeed I did get the original information here, what if the
result is LESS than the nunber of carbs on the label? For example, I
have some peanuts that state on the label 6 g carbs. Working the above
formula I get an answer of 2.6 after dividing the calorie difference
by 4. Does that mean I should consder the peanuts to have only 2.6
carbs per serving?

I must point out that on the vast majority of labels the difference
between the carbs listed and the result from the formula is the same.

Thanks,

Mxy


Does anyone have any thoughts/information on this?

Mxy
  #3  
Old November 16th, 2003, 02:22 PM
emkay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Total carb vs bioavailable carbs

On 14 Nov 2003 18:33:25 GMT, Mxy Ptlyk wrote:

A long time ago, when I was beginning to get a handle on carb counting, I
got a formula to determine if the carbs listed on a label were the actual
bioavailable carbs. I believe I got that from someone in this group. What I
remember is you subtract the calories from fat and calories from protein
from the total calories on the label and divde the result by 4. If the
answer was the same as the carbs listed on the label then that was the
total bioavailable carbs. My question is, if indeed I did get the original
information here, what if the result is LESS than the nunber of carbs on
the label? For example, I have some peanuts that state on the label 6 g
carbs. Working the above formula I get an answer of 2.6 after dividing the
calorie difference by 4. Does that mean I should consder the peanuts to
have only 2.6 carbs per serving?

I must point out that on the vast majority of labels the difference between
the carbs listed and the result from the formula is the same.

Thanks,

Mxy


It'll happen sometimes, due to rounding errors. I ran into the same issue
yesterday with walnuts:
1/4 cup
calories: 200
fat cal: 180
fat 20 g (20*9 = 180, so the fat cals are correct)
protein 5 g (5*4 = 20, which is all the calories that are left)

This leaves zero for carbs. The label says 4 g carb, 2 g fiber.

I decided in cases like this to take the greater of the calculated value
and the carb-minus-fiber value, or in this case 2 g.

Em

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dr Bernstein's Clinic (Canada) IS NOT Low Carb! Abby Walker Low Carbohydrate Diets 8 September 5th, 2005 06:13 AM
Article: The TRUTH About Low Carb Diets by Keith Klein Steve General Discussion 24 June 7th, 2004 09:05 PM
So confused! HELP. Diet, no diet, carb, no carb, fat, low fat.... Timber 285 General Discussion 14 May 12th, 2004 04:30 PM
Product Review: "Cooking TLC: Truly Low Carb Cooking, Volume I" by Karen Rysavy JulieW Low Carbohydrate Diets 1 November 6th, 2003 03:37 AM
Non impact Carbs vs. Total Carbs, bunch of crap? bamalamb Low Carbohydrate Diets 13 November 1st, 2003 02:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.