If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
A new Post about skin
"MJC" wrote in message
link.net... You may have a great unintended point "i". Things are suposed to appear smaller if they are darker right? Maybe I "should" hit a tanning salon !! Careful that excessive tanning is bad for the skin, especially for its elasticity... Tanning might actually make things worse, especially as you age... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
A new Post about skin
"MJC" wrote in message
link.net... You may have a great unintended point "i". Things are suposed to appear smaller if they are darker right? Maybe I "should" hit a tanning salon !! Careful that excessive tanning is bad for the skin, especially for its elasticity... Tanning might actually make things worse, especially as you age... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
A new Post about skin
"beeswing" wrote in message
... Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to say that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in this particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat" (stretched skin) he claims I have. Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75 and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
A new Post about skin
"beeswing" wrote in message
... Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to say that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in this particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat" (stretched skin) he claims I have. Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75 and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
A new Post about skin
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:25:01 +0200, "Lictor"
wrote: "beeswing" wrote in message ... Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to say that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in this particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat" (stretched skin) he claims I have. Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75 and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds. Yep. My mother, who is 88, has lots of loose, saggy flesh. She is also 107 lbs. at 5'6". The last thing she needs to do is lose weight. (Actually, she tells me she's down to 102 after her hip replacement surgery last month, but I'm hoping we can get her back up a bit.) And I'm sure I have some fat along with my loose flesh, but I know that if I lose more weight only part will come from this fat, and the rest will be muscle that I prefer to keep. So, no thanks. Chris (age 56) 262/143/ (145-150) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
A new Post about skin
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:25:01 +0200, "Lictor"
wrote: "beeswing" wrote in message ... Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to say that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in this particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat" (stretched skin) he claims I have. Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75 and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds. Yep. My mother, who is 88, has lots of loose, saggy flesh. She is also 107 lbs. at 5'6". The last thing she needs to do is lose weight. (Actually, she tells me she's down to 102 after her hip replacement surgery last month, but I'm hoping we can get her back up a bit.) And I'm sure I have some fat along with my loose flesh, but I know that if I lose more weight only part will come from this fat, and the rest will be muscle that I prefer to keep. So, no thanks. Chris (age 56) 262/143/ (145-150) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My Old Post Of Grand Accomplishments PLEASE READ!!!!!!! | Laureen | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 3 | February 11th, 2004 08:47 PM |
Better way to post & reply than from Google? | vlcd_hell | General Discussion | 3 | January 28th, 2004 05:39 PM |
Stretched skin post by C revisited please! | Susan | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 10 | January 21st, 2004 12:19 AM |
A $6 investment | Barb Zuchniak | General Discussion | 0 | January 13th, 2004 03:49 PM |
Newbie question about loose skin | Pook! | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 3 | September 25th, 2003 10:17 PM |