A new Post about skin

"MJC" wrote in message
link.net...
You may have a great unintended point "i". Things are suposed to appear
smaller if they are darker right? Maybe I "should" hit a tanning salon

!!

Careful that excessive tanning is bad for the skin, especially for its
elasticity... Tanning might actually make things worse, especially as you
age...

"MJC" wrote in message
link.net...
You may have a great unintended point "i". Things are suposed to appear
smaller if they are darker right? Maybe I "should" hit a tanning salon

!!

Careful that excessive tanning is bad for the skin, especially for its
elasticity... Tanning might actually make things worse, especially as you
age...

"beeswing" wrote in message
...
Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra
skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't
contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to
say
that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in
this
particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat"
(stretched
skin) he claims I have.

Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either
annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75
and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her
brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can
see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also
visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess
she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is
very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think
the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds.

"beeswing" wrote in message
...
Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra
skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't
contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to
say
that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in
this
particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat"
(stretched
skin) he claims I have.

Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either
annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75
and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her
brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can
see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also
visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess
she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is
very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think
the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds.

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:25:01 +0200, "Lictor"
wrote:

"beeswing" wrote in message
...
Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra
skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't
contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to
say
that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in
this
particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat"
(stretched
skin) he claims I have.

Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either
annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75
and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her
brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can
see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also
visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess
she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is
very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think
the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds.


Yep. My mother, who is 88, has lots of loose, saggy flesh. She is
also 107 lbs. at 5'6". The last thing she needs to do is lose weight.
(Actually, she tells me she's down to 102 after her hip replacement
surgery last month, but I'm hoping we can get her back up a bit.)

And I'm sure I have some fat along with my loose flesh, but I know
that if I lose more weight only part will come from this fat, and the
rest will be muscle that I prefer to keep. So, no thanks.

Chris (age 56)
262/143/ (145-150)

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:25:01 +0200, "Lictor"
wrote:

"beeswing" wrote in message
...
Interesting...my lowest low has been 104.5 pounds, and I still had "extra
skin"; this gentleman would suggest I that I lose more body fat. I won't
contradict him...even then, I still carry some fat...but I would like to
say
that he's the only guy out there that I've found that would support in
this
particular 5 ft 3 in woman a weight low enough to lose all the "fat"
(stretched
skin) he claims I have.

Same here, I have a fifty-sth lady in my neighborhood who is either
annorexic or has cancer/AIDS whatever. Anyway, I estimate her as around 1m75
and 40kg, maybe less. I suspect most of her body fat left to lose is in her
brain. She has very visible knee and shoulder articulations (like, you can
see the little details of the bone structure under the skin) and also
visible bones on the arms. Very little visible muscles too, though I guess
she has enough left to move around (somewhat, she lacks stability and she is
very slow). Nevertheless, she has very lose and wrinkled skin. I don't think
the "solution" for her would be to lose some extra pounds.


Yep. My mother, who is 88, has lots of loose, saggy flesh. She is
also 107 lbs. at 5'6". The last thing she needs to do is lose weight.
(Actually, she tells me she's down to 102 after her hip replacement
surgery last month, but I'm hoping we can get her back up a bit.)

And I'm sure I have some fat along with my loose flesh, but I know
that if I lose more weight only part will come from this fat, and the
rest will be muscle that I prefer to keep. So, no thanks.

Chris (age 56)
262/143/ (145-150)