Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?

Kevin Hill wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Doesn't sound like the official Weigh****chers:

Your judgment.

My observation.


People are generally unable to see themselves following Weigh****chers
lifelong.

Your judgement.

My experience.


Ime, people are able to see themselves eating less per the 2PD Approach
lifelong.

Your judgement.

My experience.

There is nothing simpler than weighing meals that works.

Your judgement.

My observation.

Simplicity is not seen but is experienced.

Your judgement.

My observation.

My experience includes feedback from people who are not my patients.

Your judgement.

My experience.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Your judgement.

My choice.


Perhaps now you can stop with the useless responses that pepper
your posts.

Sorry my truthful responses bother you (shrug).



Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

"Mirek Fídler" wrote:

There is nothing simpler than weighing meals that works.

People will simply stop weighting. It is still weighting and counting,
although this time just adding, not multiplying...

Mirek

If they choose to stop watching how much they are eating, they will gain
only to lose again when they resume. At some point, they will choose to
just keep watching how much they are eating. Then, the weight loss will
be permanent. Once someone is enlightened to what is the truth, nothing
else will serve as a surrogate.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
|| "Mirek Fídler" wrote:
|||
|||| There is nothing simpler than weighing meals that works.
|||
||| People will simply stop weighting. It is still weighting and
||| counting, although this time just adding, not multiplying...
|||
||| Mirek
||
|| If they choose to stop watching how much they are eating, they will
|| gain only to lose again when they resume.

|| At some point, they will
|| choose to just keep watching how much they are eating. Then, the
|| weight loss will be permanent. Once someone is enlightened to what
|| is the truth, nothing else will serve as a surrogate.

Your delusion.

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
|| "Mirek Fídler" wrote:
|||
|||| There is nothing simpler than weighing meals that works.
|||
||| People will simply stop weighting. It is still weighting and
||| counting, although this time just adding, not multiplying...
|||
||| Mirek
||
|| If they choose to stop watching how much they are eating, they will
|| gain only to lose again when they resume.

|| At some point, they will
|| choose to just keep watching how much they are eating. Then, the
|| weight loss will be permanent. Once someone is enlightened to what
|| is the truth, nothing else will serve as a surrogate.

Your delusion.

Roger Zoul wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
|| "Mirek Fídler" wrote:
|||
|||| There is nothing simpler than weighing meals that works.
|||
||| People will simply stop weighting. It is still weighting and
||| counting, although this time just adding, not multiplying...
|||
||| Mirek
||
|| If they choose to stop watching how much they are eating, they will
|| gain only to lose again when they resume.

|| At some point, they will
|| choose to just keep watching how much they are eating. Then, the
|| weight loss will be permanent. Once someone is enlightened to what
|| is the truth, nothing else will serve as a surrogate.

Your delusion.

My experience.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:35:48 GMT, Luna wrote:

Nope, never took ownership of it. You missed the ? too. Hate blinds the
truth.


Posting something to usenet that was not authored by you, without
attributing the source, is plagiarizing. You published it to an electronic
medium without giving credit to the author.

Ok, have it your way even though I altered the entire text.

Oh, see this? "Posting something to usenet that was not authored by you,
without attributing the source, is plagiarizing."

I have seen that very sentence, or close to it, before.

You plagiarized it. Shamey.

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:35:48 GMT, Luna wrote:

Nope, never took ownership of it. You missed the ? too. Hate blinds the
truth.


Posting something to usenet that was not authored by you, without
attributing the source, is plagiarizing. You published it to an electronic
medium without giving credit to the author.

Ok, have it your way even though I altered the entire text.

Oh, see this? "Posting something to usenet that was not authored by you,
without attributing the source, is plagiarizing."

I have seen that very sentence, or close to it, before.

You plagiarized it. Shamey.

In article ,
MU wrote:

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:35:48 GMT, Luna wrote:

Nope, never took ownership of it. You missed the ? too. Hate blinds the
truth.


Posting something to usenet that was not authored by you, without
attributing the source, is plagiarizing. You published it to an electronic
medium without giving credit to the author.

Ok, have it your way even though I altered the entire text.


If you altered the entire text, every word, then it _was_ authored by you.
What entire text did you alter? Winnie the Pooh? The script for Star Wars?
You post something without giving a source, so it is assumed it was written
by you. Then you say you didn't write it. Then you say you did. Which is
it?

--
Michelle Levin
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.

In article ,
MU wrote:

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:35:48 GMT, Luna wrote:

Nope, never took ownership of it. You missed the ? too. Hate blinds the
truth.


Posting something to usenet that was not authored by you, without
attributing the source, is plagiarizing. You published it to an electronic
medium without giving credit to the author.

Ok, have it your way even though I altered the entire text.


If you altered the entire text, every word, then it _was_ authored by you.
What entire text did you alter? Winnie the Pooh? The script for Star Wars?
You post something without giving a source, so it is assumed it was written
by you. Then you say you didn't write it. Then you say you did. Which is
it?

--
Michelle Levin
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.

In article ,
MU wrote:

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:35:48 GMT, Luna wrote:

Nope, never took ownership of it. You missed the ? too. Hate blinds the
truth.


Posting something to usenet that was not authored by you, without
attributing the source, is plagiarizing. You published it to an electronic
medium without giving credit to the author.

Ok, have it your way even though I altered the entire text.


If you altered the entire text, every word, then it _was_ authored by you.
What entire text did you alter? Winnie the Pooh? The script for Star Wars?
You post something without giving a source, so it is assumed it was written
by you. Then you say you didn't write it. Then you say you did. Which is
it?

--
Michelle Levin
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.