A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ARTICLE: Yet another study has shown that the Atkins diet works



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 23rd, 2003, 01:58 AM
Jim Marnott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARTICLE: Yet another study has shown that the Atkins diet works

The burning question

October 23, 2003

*Yet another study has shown that the Atkins diet works. But even the
scientist in charge is baffled about why the low-carb regime reduces fat
more effectively than conventional low-calorie, low-fat eating plans,
Robert Matthews reports.*

An academic nutritionist at the University of Cincinnati, Dr Bonnie
Brehm, is at the cutting edge of research into the biggest question to
hit her field in decades: does the Atkins diet work?

Most nutritionists faced with the torrent of anecdotal evidence for its
effectiveness have simply parroted the mantra that more research is
needed, while muttering darkly about possible long-term health effects.

Brehm and her colleagues, in contrast, have spent the past few years
actually doing the research and will unveil their findings at the
American Dietetic Association's annual meeting next week.

They have been studying the effectiveness of the Atkins diet in trials
involving people classed as clinically obese, implying a weight of more
than 92 kilograms (14 stone) in a person 175 centimetres (5 foot, 9
inches) tall. The latest results are in - and they appear to vindicate
the late Dr Robert Atkins, whose diet books have sold 15 million copies
over 30 years.

According to Brehm, those following Atkins's low-carbohydrate diet for
four months achieved twice the weight loss of those on a conventional
calorie-controlled, low-fat diet. Furthermore, the team found no
evidence of harmful effects from following the diet - at least during
the study.

These results are in line with those found in similar small studies now
starting to emerge. As well as backing the claims made for the Atkins
diet, these latest results seem to further undermine standard
nutritional advice about the need to focus on cutting fat and calories.

They are something of an embarrassment to Brehm, whose research is
funded by the American Heart Association, which has long advocated
calorie-controlled, low-fat diets.

As a scientist, Brehm puts unearthing the truth above pleasing her
paymasters - but it is this that causes most concern. She is having
problems explaining her findings - and in the increasingly vociferous
debate over the Atkins diet, that may well land her in trouble at next
week's meeting.

The scientific world is becoming increasingly polarised over the diet,
with researchers such as Brehm being given a tough time over their
apparent support for what some scientists regard as the nutritional
equivalent of crystal therapy. At the heart of the controversy is the
science behind the Atkins diet - first published 30 years ago - and
whether it is really anything more than a collection of buzzwords.

Conventional wisdom dictates that calories are the key to weight loss,
and so those who lose weight must simply be consuming fewer calories
than they burn up. Yet, according to Brehm, the obese people who lost
weight on the Atkins diet ate and burned up essentially the same number
of calories as those on the standard diet. What was very different was
the proportion of body fat shed by each group, which mirrored their
percentage weight loss. On the face of it, this backs the central claim
of the Atkins diet: that a low-carb diet turns the body into a
fat-burning machine.

To trigger this effect, Atkins dieters are instructed to begin by
eliminating all carbohydrates from their diet, forcing their bodies to
get energy by burning up fat reserves instead. The result is supposed to
be weight loss, plus the production of compounds known as ketones; the
higher the level of "ketosis", the more fat is being burnt.

That's the theory. Yet studies of the patients in Brehm's trial failed
to reveal a connection between ketosis and fat loss. "We didn't see any
correlation - all of our expectations were confounded," she says. "I'm
hoping someone in the audience might have some answers."

Brehm is confident that there is a reasonable, if not simple,
explanation for her findings: "In the end, the energy in has got to
match the energy out."

Even more baffling is why there are still such enormous gaps in
knowledge about how humans respond to diet. The past 20 years have seen
obesity reach record levels in the developed world. This has led
scientists to concede that the standard advice on nutrition and healthy
eating has been an abject failure - yet the Atkins diet is still
dismissed as a "fad" by the British Dietetic Association, with leading
nutritionists insisting that there is insufficient scientific evidence
to give it more credence. This lack of evidence has not deterred many in
the medical profession from condemning the diet out of hand. Last week a
poll of British doctors revealed that one in four would advise their
patients to stay fat rather than try the Atkins diet - despite the
proven life-threatening effects of obesity.

Such attitudes might suggest that the scientific world is in the grip of
cognitive dissonance over the Atkins Diet, preferring to ignore whatever
evidence it does not like. Professor Eric Westman, a clinical trials
expert at Duke University in North Carolina, and author of a study of
the evidence for and against the diet, says, "It is making people
re-examine dogma - and it's not always appreciated."

According to his review, which is due to appear in Current
Atherosclerosis Reports, studies show that the Atkins diet does produce
weight loss over six months, and without obvious health effects.
Contrary to the claims of many nutritionists, there is even evidence
that it may be healthier than the standard diet: despite its promotion
of fat and eggs, studies suggest that the diet may boost levels of the
healthy forms of cholesterol.

Westman thinks that this unexpected effect may explain a long-standing
mystery surrounding heart disease. In the late 1980s, researchers began
investigating the unusually low rates of heart attacks and stroke among
Eskimo communities in Greenland. Until now, the explanation was thought
to lie in their diet of oily fish. Yet attempts to reduce heart disease
using supplements of fish oil extracts proved disappointing. Westman
says the studies of the Atkins diet point to another explanation: that
the lo-carb diet forced on the Inuit by their environment gives them
higher levels of healthy forms of cholesterol, which are proven to lower
heart disease risk.

Despite this, Westman cautions anyone with a medical condition against
rushing onto a low-carb diet. "The problem is that it works too well,"
he explains. "The diet can cause insulin levels to drop by 50 per cent
in one day, so diabetics could find themselves over-medicated. It's the
same for those with high blood pressure."

Even so, Westman believes that the results are impressive enough to
warrant an intensive research effort on the Atkins diet: "We're in a
period when we will learn a lot."

It is not a prospect that thrills the entire nutritional science
community. Westman has been vilified for conducting research with
financial support from the Atkins Foundation - despite the fact that
some vocal critics of the diet, such as Dr Susan Jebb, the head of
nutrition at the UK Medical Research Council, have, in turn, received
funding from bodies such as the Flour Advisory Bureau.

Brehm has also run into resistance even over her research funded by the
American Heart Association.

"We had a tough time getting our results published - it took 18 months
altogether," she says. "The big journals really couldn't handle it. But
we're not endorsing the diet: it's just our results."

What both sides do agree on is the paucity of scientific evidence on the
long-term benefits and health effects of the Atkins diet. With the
world-wide obesity problem now claiming an estimated 2 million adult
lives a year, Brehm believes that the time has come to commit serious
resources to studies of low-carb diets.

As she says: "We need much more doing - and doing quickly." This is a
sentiment endorsed by Professor Tom Sanders, the director of the
Nutrition, Food and Health Research Centre at King's College, London -
and a sceptic regarding the Atkins diet.

"The evidence is that it's the calorie intake that counts," Sanders
says. "But in the end, diets don't work because people don't follow
them. We need large-scale, randomised and controlled trials of
treatments of obesity running for one to two years."

Those already embarked on such research suspect that it will take a
great deal to overcome the visceral response the mere mention of Atkins
provokes among academics. Says Brehm: "A lot of people just want to hold
on to what they learned in college."

The Telegraph, London
--
Jim
231/194?/197
Atkins since 22 May '03
Gym since 1 sept '03

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret Diarmid Logan General Discussion 135 February 14th, 2004 05:56 PM
Low carb diets General Discussion 249 January 9th, 2004 12:15 AM
Atkins diet may reduce seizures in children with epilepsy Diarmid Logan General Discussion 23 December 14th, 2003 12:39 PM
Now Harvard study backs up Atkins diet Diarmid Logan General Discussion 84 November 17th, 2003 12:31 AM
Now Harvard study backs up Atkins diet Diarmid Logan Low Carbohydrate Diets 79 November 17th, 2003 12:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.