If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT - high triglycerides in dogs
Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all
getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with some crazy numbers. Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a max of 290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those are not high, they are off the charts. I've tried to do some research on the internet, but it's hard to find any info. Most of the hits I get deal with *people* who have high triglycerides, and how walking their dogs is part of their therapy. What little I have found indicates that the dogs should be on a very strict low-fat diet. My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very common allergen for dogs. So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably retest their blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, untreated, it can lead to heart disease and severe pancreatic disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural Choice Lamb and Rice for just about all their lives, and it's fat content fits within the guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the high end) and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to to Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find myself wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the dog groups in usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people who complained about their dogs high triglycerides talked about their dogs having values in the 350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if that was what my dogs had. :-) -- Debbie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Debbie Cusick wrote:
|| Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are || all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly || checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood || panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of || indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, || but the results came back with some crazy numbers. || || Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a || max of 290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those || are not high, they are off the charts. I've tried to do some || research on the internet, but it's hard to find any info. Most of || the hits I get deal with *people* who have high triglycerides, and || how walking their dogs is part of their therapy. What little I have || found indicates that the dogs should be on a very strict low-fat || diet. || ?? why should a dog be on a strict low-fat diet? I can see why exercise would be important. || My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't || understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact || that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit || on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use || corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've || looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very || common allergen for dogs. Try LC. They probalby already eat too many carbs. || || So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably || retest their blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, || untreated, it can lead to heart disease and severe pancreatic || disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural Choice Lamb and Rice for just || about all their lives, and it's fat content fits within the || guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the high end) || and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to to || Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find || myself wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the || dog groups in usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people || who complained about their dogs high triglycerides talked about || their dogs having values in the 350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if || that was what my dogs had. :-) I don't see how rice is going to help them...and I don't see how low fat will be particularly healthly for them since that usually means high carb. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Debbie,
On 14-Sep-2004, "Debbie Cusick" wrote: Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with some crazy numbers. http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp Input "hypercholesterolemia". Most of what I found on the 'net concerning high cholesterol in dogs had to do with hypothyroidism. I hope you find what you're looking for. Take care, Carmen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I'm thinking the dogs should be doing lo-carb as well. No corn or rice
fillers. More fat, not less. If a lo-carb diet lowers triglycerides in humans, why wouldn't it work for dogs too? Why not try feeding them meat, fish, fowl, and eggs for a month or 2 and get them re-tested. Cost may be a factor for you, but you may have to spend it on drugs later, which may be even more than switching to a more expensive diet. Meals closer to their natural ones certainly couldn't hurt them. Tom 210/180/180 -------------------------------------------------------- "Debbie Cusick" wrote in message news:sQK1d.18572$z_3.1347@trndny07... Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with some crazy numbers. Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a max of 290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those are not high, they are off the charts. I've tried to do some research on the internet, but it's hard to find any info. Most of the hits I get deal with *people* who have high triglycerides, and how walking their dogs is part of their therapy. What little I have found indicates that the dogs should be on a very strict low-fat diet. My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very common allergen for dogs. So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably retest their blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, untreated, it can lead to heart disease and severe pancreatic disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural Choice Lamb and Rice for just about all their lives, and it's fat content fits within the guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the high end) and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to to Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find myself wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the dog groups in usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people who complained about their dogs high triglycerides talked about their dogs having values in the 350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if that was what my dogs had. :-) -- Debbie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Carmen wrote:
http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp Input "hypercholesterolemia". Most of what I found on the 'net concerning high cholesterol in dogs had to do with hypothyroidism. Thanks for the Merck link. Great site. Oddly, neither dog had high cholesterol as far as their overall number went, just the triglycerides, which makes me wonder if the test was skewed in some way. Thyroid was also checked, and both are normal there as well. My third dog, who *does* suffer from hypothyroidism, and is on medication for it, has pefectly normal triglyceride levels. I never know what to think anymore. I posted a question on rec.pets.dogs.health also, and everyone there is telling me that Science Diet is an excellent thing for dogs, and almost no dogs are allergic to corn, and it's an excellent food for them. Yet I've had many others tell me the exact opposite. It's as bad as dietary advice in humans. :-) -- Debbie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
and everyone there is telling me that Science
Diet is an excellent thing for dogs, and almost no dogs are allergic to corn, and it's an excellent food for them. Yet I've had many others tell me the exact opposite. It's as bad as dietary advice in humans. :-) Maybe every dog is different, just like humans? I really can't imagine how or why rice and corn would be good for carnivores though. It just seems odd. But I'm no expert. LCing since 12/01/03- Me- 5'7" 265/166/140 & hubby- 6' 310/188/180 http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/lcer09/my_photos |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very common allergen for dogs. Science Diet, Eukanuba, and those other expensive dog foods are formulated to be easier on the dog's intestines while producing less waste products. My dog was on the one that is mainly rice and chicken because that was easier on her liver and kidneys as she got older. Do you know if your dogs are allergic to corn? If not, what's the worry? Try the Science Diet for a short time and see how your dogs adapt to it. BTW: did he recommend the canned or the dry? Pat in TX |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very common allergen for dogs. Science Diet, Eukanuba, and those other expensive dog foods are formulated to be easier on the dog's intestines while producing less waste products. My dog was on the one that is mainly rice and chicken because that was easier on her liver and kidneys as she got older. Do you know if your dogs are allergic to corn? If not, what's the worry? Try the Science Diet for a short time and see how your dogs adapt to it. BTW: did he recommend the canned or the dry? Pat in TX |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
get 'em off dry food if they're on it. dogs would never hunt down a rice
paddy or corn stalk in a natural environment. -- Peace, Pen -- Pawbreakers - The Candy for Cats! http://www.pawbreakers.com "Debbie Cusick" wrote in message news:sQK1d.18572$z_3.1347@trndny07... Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with some crazy numbers. Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a max of 290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those are not high, they are off the charts. I've tried to do some research on the internet, but it's hard to find any info. Most of the hits I get deal with *people* who have high triglycerides, and how walking their dogs is part of their therapy. What little I have found indicates that the dogs should be on a very strict low-fat diet. My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very common allergen for dogs. So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably retest their blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, untreated, it can lead to heart disease and severe pancreatic disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural Choice Lamb and Rice for just about all their lives, and it's fat content fits within the guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the high end) and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to to Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find myself wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the dog groups in usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people who complained about their dogs high triglycerides talked about their dogs having values in the 350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if that was what my dogs had. :-) -- Debbie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
get 'em off dry food if they're on it. dogs would never hunt down a rice
paddy or corn stalk in a natural environment. -- Peace, Pen -- Pawbreakers - The Candy for Cats! http://www.pawbreakers.com "Debbie Cusick" wrote in message news:sQK1d.18572$z_3.1347@trndny07... Has anyone ever had any experience with the above? My three dogs are all getting older, and they were at the vet's for a standard yearly checkup and shots in August - and the vet recommended we run a blood panel on them, which they recommend for older dogs, in case of indications of troubles. It *seemed* like a good idea, and I agreed, but the results came back with some crazy numbers. Two of my dogs have crazy-high triglycerides! Normal for dogs is a max of 290, and Maggie's count was 950, and Merlin's was 1880! Those are not high, they are off the charts. I've tried to do some research on the internet, but it's hard to find any info. Most of the hits I get deal with *people* who have high triglycerides, and how walking their dogs is part of their therapy. What little I have found indicates that the dogs should be on a very strict low-fat diet. My vet suggests I put them on Science Diet i/d, but I don't understand vet's love affair with Science Diet (other than the fact that it is only sold through vet's offices, and they make a profit on it). I've never liked the ingredients in Science Diet. They use corn as their number one ingredient in all their products I've looked at (including the i/d) and I've read that corn is a very common allergen for dogs. So I'm trying to decide what to do. Of course I should probably retest their blood - but in the meantime? The vet says that, untreated, it can lead to heart disease and severe pancreatic disease. I've fed them Nutro Natural Choice Lamb and Rice for just about all their lives, and it's fat content fits within the guidelines recommended for their condition (though at the high end) and it has not kept them normal. I'm thinking about switching to to Nutro Natural Choice Lite, which is even lower in fat, yet find myself wondering if this is what is best for them. I searched the dog groups in usenet but found nothing too useful there, and people who complained about their dogs high triglycerides talked about their dogs having values in the 350-500 range. heck, I'd be happy if that was what my dogs had. :-) -- Debbie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oh, brother (I roll my eyes) | Eva Whitley | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 206 | May 23rd, 2004 04:45 PM |
High protein, not low carbs? | SLR | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 17 | January 27th, 2004 05:51 PM |
Low carb diets | General Discussion | 249 | January 8th, 2004 11:15 PM | |
Low carb diets | Weightwatchers | 245 | January 8th, 2004 11:15 PM | |
anyone have info on | Anglea Woollcombe | Weightwatchers | 45 | January 8th, 2004 02:19 PM |