LC eating will make you fat article suggests

I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?


Nat
254/232/140
SB since 7/19/04

I eat more veggies on LC than I ever ate on what would be considered an
EXTREMELY healthy diet prior...

Peace,
Pen

"Nat TheBrat" wrote in message
om...
I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?


Nat
254/232/140
SB since 7/19/04

I eat more veggies on LC than I ever ate on what would be considered an
EXTREMELY healthy diet prior...

Peace,
Pen

"Nat TheBrat" wrote in message
om...
I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?


Nat
254/232/140
SB since 7/19/04

Diet bashing, especially low carb types, is as common and dirty as is
political bashing of liberals by conservatives.

Conservatives, and "low fat" believers want things as they are and have
been.

No changes.....

Therefore all this new sounding stuff is automatically bad. [liberal
proposals, or "low carb" eating - which disturbs the normal food
industry of the USA.

Jim

Nat TheBrat wrote:

I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

I doubt that there is any evidence... and it doesn't really make sense.


SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?

They are changes, and therefore are dangerous.



Nat
254/232/140
SB since 7/19/04

jbuch wrote in message ...
Diet bashing, especially low carb types, is as common and dirty as is
political bashing of liberals by conservatives.

Conservatives, and "low fat" believers want things as they are and have
been.

No changes.....



And of course it's not common or dirty for someone like you to throw
mud the other way and turn a LC thread into a political one is it?
That's perfectly OK right?






Therefore all this new sounding stuff is automatically bad. [liberal
proposals, or "low carb" eating - which disturbs the normal food
industry of the USA.

Jim

Nat TheBrat wrote:

I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

I doubt that there is any evidence... and it doesn't really make sense.


SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?

They are changes, and therefore are dangerous.



Nat
254/232/140
SB since 7/19/04

People says on this forum that if you eat under 100g of carbs per day, then
you're eating low carb. I am sure there's some reason behind this limit but I
have no idea where to find it. Whole grain or no whole grain on this 100g, it's
your call.

To say that veg are high carbs is nonsense. Take broccoli, famous for its
antioxidant effects and said to lower chances of getting cancer, you wonder how
many grams of carbs are there in a 1 cup? 3.54 g net carb (total carb - fibre)
If this is "high carb", what do you call, say chocolate rice pudding?
"Skyscrapper carb"?

The article is right about the sweeteners though.


Nat TheBrat wrote:

I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?

People says on this forum that if you eat under 100g of carbs per day, then
you're eating low carb. I am sure there's some reason behind this limit but I
have no idea where to find it. Whole grain or no whole grain on this 100g, it's
your call.

To say that veg are high carbs is nonsense. Take broccoli, famous for its
antioxidant effects and said to lower chances of getting cancer, you wonder how
many grams of carbs are there in a 1 cup? 3.54 g net carb (total carb - fibre)
If this is "high carb", what do you call, say chocolate rice pudding?
"Skyscrapper carb"?

The article is right about the sweeteners though.


Nat TheBrat wrote:

I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?

Chet Hayes wrote:
jbuch wrote in message ...

Diet bashing, especially low carb types, is as common and dirty as is
political bashing of liberals by conservatives.

Conservatives, and "low fat" believers want things as they are and have
been.

No changes.....




And of course it's not common or dirty for someone like you to throw
mud the other way and turn a LC thread into a political one is it?
That's perfectly OK right?


I am such a dirty slimy scumball for what I said, aren't I?

Therefore all this new sounding stuff is automatically bad. [liberal

proposals, or "low carb" eating - which disturbs the normal food
industry of the USA.

Jim

Nat TheBrat wrote:


I checked the google archives, and didn't see that this Web MD article
has been posted before, but I might have missed it.

This article is titled "Will Low-Carb Diets Untimately Make Us Fat?"

http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/92/101785.htm

I'm new to LCing, but it seems to me that there are a number of
inaccuracies about LCing in the article, and I'd appreciate a critique
of the article by more knowledgable posters.

Quoting one critic of low carbing:

" 'In the long term, there is no question that low-carb diets will be
shown to be dangerous,' he says, noting that hundreds of
epidemiological studies around the world have demonstrated that
high-carbohydrate foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
reduce risk of heart disease and prevent cancer."

Does any LC eating plan keep one from eating vegetables and fruits?

And is it only the high carb veggies that reduce the risk of heart
disease and cancer?

I doubt that there is any evidence... and it doesn't really make sense.


SB also allows whole grains, so what's this guy's gripe? (I'm not
familiar with whether other LC diets allow whole grains. Do they?)

Seems to me that much of the criticism of LCing in the article has to
do with the new lc products coming out now. So how does that make LC
with naturally LC foods dangerous?

They are changes, and therefore are dangerous.



Nat
254/232/140
SB since 7/19/04


--
................................


Keepsake gift for young girls.
Unique and personal one-of-a-kind.
Builds strong minds 12 ways.
Guaranteed satisfaction
- courteous money back
- keep bonus gifts

http://www.alicebook.com

jbuch wrote:
Chet Hayes wrote:
And of course it's not common or dirty for someone like you to throw
mud the other way and turn a LC thread into a political one is it?
That's perfectly OK right?

I am such a dirty slimy scumball for what I said, aren't I?

Possibly.

jbuch wrote:
Chet Hayes wrote:
And of course it's not common or dirty for someone like you to throw
mud the other way and turn a LC thread into a political one is it?
That's perfectly OK right?

I am such a dirty slimy scumball for what I said, aren't I?

Possibly.