Comparison of 4 diet plans: all produce similar results

"MU" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 May 2009 22:23:39 -0500, L.B. Listmann wrote:

"MU" wrote in message
...

Considering the percentages of people who fail on LC, especailly that
quack-fraud Atkins version, it makes no difference that LC was not
included.

And how many succeed on carrying a scale around all day to make sure they
don't go over 2 lbs?

Many.

What about what they drink? People can drink hundreds
of calories a day by drinking sugary sodas and other drinks.

Clue coming, get your pen out an write it down.

No more answers until you read the 2PD for if you had, you wouldn't ask
such ridiculous questions.

You're as crazy
as Chung.

How many succeeded on the 2 lbs a day diet? Where is the scientific
evidence it works for everyone from small petite women to tall husky men?
Where are the double blind studies?

Asked and answered.
--
http://tinyurl.com/5gt7

Thanks MU aka Chung Jr. Um, you've displayed, forever archived by Google,
well, heh, I don't need to point it out that you're a ****ing hypocritical
POS. I hope Jebus has a plan for your ways. Hee hee. Btw, what you write,
is never gone.

"Vic-20 Lad" wrote:

Thanks MU aka Chung Jr. Um, you've displayed, forever archived by Google,

You're arguing with a troll and a loon.
It's a fools game.
A VIC-20 fan should know better.

Mine still works; with homemade 16K cards.


Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G

On Tue, 05 May 2009 00:34:33 GMT, Vic-20 Lad wrote:

"MU" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 May 2009 22:23:39 -0500, L.B. Listmann wrote:

"MU" wrote in message
...

Considering the percentages of people who fail on LC, especailly that
quack-fraud Atkins version, it makes no difference that LC was not
included.

And how many succeed on carrying a scale around all day to make sure they
don't go over 2 lbs?

Many.

What about what they drink? People can drink hundreds
of calories a day by drinking sugary sodas and other drinks.

Clue coming, get your pen out an write it down.

No more answers until you read the 2PD for if you had, you wouldn't ask
such ridiculous questions.

You're as crazy
as Chung.

How many succeeded on the 2 lbs a day diet? Where is the scientific
evidence it works for everyone from small petite women to tall husky men?
Where are the double blind studies?

Asked and answered.
--
http://tinyurl.com/5gt7

Thanks MU aka Chung Jr.

Most welcome.

Um, you've displayed, forever archived by Google,
well, heh, I don't need to point it out that you're a ****ing hypocritical
POS. I hope Jebus has a plan for your ways. Hee hee. Btw, what you write,
is never gone.

I suppose that, um, "archived" and "is never gone" are the same
thing...in kiddie boy talk. lol
--
http://tinyurl.com/5gt7

"Vic-20 Lad" wrote in message
...

"MU" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 May 2009 22:23:39 -0500, L.B. Listmann wrote:

"MU" wrote in message
...

Considering the percentages of people who fail on LC, especailly that
quack-fraud Atkins version, it makes no difference that LC was not
included.

And how many succeed on carrying a scale around all day to make sure
they
don't go over 2 lbs?

Many.

What about what they drink? People can drink hundreds
of calories a day by drinking sugary sodas and other drinks.

Clue coming, get your pen out an write it down.

No more answers until you read the 2PD for if you had, you wouldn't ask
such ridiculous questions.

You're as crazy
as Chung.

How many succeeded on the 2 lbs a day diet? Where is the scientific
evidence it works for everyone from small petite women to tall husky
men?
Where are the double blind studies?

Asked and answered.
--
http://tinyurl.com/5gt7

Thanks MU aka Chung Jr. Um, you've displayed, forever archived by Google,
well, heh, I don't need to point it out that you're a ****ing hypocritical
POS. I hope Jebus has a plan for your ways. Hee hee. Btw, what you
write, is never gone.

They're both nuts!

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...8ffd064425210?

Truth is simple :-)

May GOD soften your heart, L.B., so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:

http://T3WiJ.com

Amen.

Love in the truth,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopus and Simon ...
.... ----------------- be hungry ! ! !"

Only GOD can cut the "hunger is starvation" delusion from our hearts:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...81ab7d7ce78de?

On Mon, 4 May 2009 20:34:12 +0000 (UTC), Kaz Kylheku wrote:

On 2009-05-04, L.B. Listmann wrote:

"MU" wrote in message
...

Considering the percentages of people who fail on LC, especailly that
quack-fraud Atkins version, it makes no difference that LC was not
included.

And how many succeed on carrying a scale around all day to make sure they
don't go over 2 lbs?

I don't think that's the idea. The idea is to prepare the food in advance; i.e.
assemble everything you are going to eat in one day, and weigh it all at once.

Nice idea, totally impractical.

The people clearly targetted by this diet fall into two categories:....

Everyone is targeted.

The former group would probably not stick for very long with a diet that
required them to carry a scale around. The second group would likely face
insurmountable challenges from any approach which allowed them to eat randomly
and keep track of it.

What about what they drink? People can drink hundreds
of calories a day by drinking sugary sodas and other drinks.

Anything which contains energy would have to be weighed, with its water content
and all. So you'd obviously have to think twice about sugary crap, the
inclusion of which would consume your two pound allotment rather quickly.

Obviously you can drink on this diet, but if the drink has calories, it must
come from the pre-measured parcel of food. Otherwise it has to be something
with zero, or negligible energy content: water, tea, black coffee, etc. If you
want to enjoy juice, milk, pop, beer, etc. it has to be included in the
weighing.

Yep. You need to get off the prepared portioning though.

On Mon, 04 May 2009 18:36:24 -0400, Màck©® wrote:

you are very wrong about the 2 pound quack's diet. the chung nutter
is stating that the 2 pounds (including water weight) is for everyone,
regardless of age or medical condition as prescribed by the voices in
his head he calls his god.

do a little googling on chung and the 2 pound quackery. and be sure
to google andrew b chung ocala florida to find out why he left the
state.

Speaking of loonies, how they hanging, Mack? Long time, no lies.

I reinstated your newsgroup and sci.med.cardiology, you Disingenuous Old
Clunker.
--
http://tinyurl.com/5gt7