Just a thought but...

Now that Atkins is dead do you think this company will take on to the idea,
as the Scientologists have, to sell future editions of Atkins books with the
phrase, Based on the teachings of Robert Atkins... etc?

Only they will add new information or Tech, in Scientology parlance,
specifically when they find new products to shill?

I mean Atkins himself was selling out in the end, the last version of his
book was the first to accept "sugar free" sugar alcohol products as safe for
the low carber, coincidentally just before releasing his own sugar free
sugar alcohol products.

Now that it's more a corporation rather than a living person's reputation on
the line, should we expect a major push of products down our throat ala Dr.
Phil... oh wait... Dr. Phil is living isn't he, I guess we should debate if
he's a person... no matter ya'll get my point.

PJ

--

"The very aim and end of our institutions is just this: that we may think
what we like and say what we think."
- Oliver Wendell Holmes

"To be loved is to be fortunate, but to be hated is to achieve distinction."
- Minna Antrim

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken
seriously."
- Hubert H. Humphrey

"The idea that you can merchandise candidates for high office like breakfast
cereal--that you can gather votes like box tops--is, I think, the ultimate
indignity to the democratic process."
- Adlai Stevenson

PJ DiSanti wrote:

Now that Atkins is dead do you think this company will take on to the idea,
as the Scientologists have, to sell future editions of Atkins books with the
phrase, Based on the teachings of Robert Atkins... etc?

Only they will add new information or Tech, in Scientology parlance,
specifically when they find new products to shill?

I mean Atkins himself was selling out in the end, the last version of his
book was the first to accept "sugar free" sugar alcohol products as safe for
the low carber, coincidentally just before releasing his own sugar free
sugar alcohol products.

Now that it's more a corporation rather than a living person's reputation on
the line, should we expect a major push of products down our throat ala Dr.
Phil... oh wait... Dr. Phil is living isn't he, I guess we should debate if
he's a person... no matter ya'll get my point.

No. What is your point? Research on the effectiveness of the
Atkins diet and similar ones is increasing. Results are
showing that the low carbohydrate approach to losing weight
is effective for many people. Assuming the research
continues to show the Atkins approach is effective, then,
obviously, people will develop and market new products to
satisfy the increased demand for them. That's fundamental
economics.

martin

Well, where have I been? I had no idea he passed away.
Just read up on the story.

You're a troll, I think no matter what I post you've made it your mission to
auto-contradict anything I write, so I think you should get cancer of the
cock and have it removed without anesthesia. You are killfiled.

PJ

--

"The very aim and end of our institutions is just this: that we may think
what we like and say what we think."
- Oliver Wendell Holmes

"To be loved is to be fortunate, but to be hated is to achieve distinction."
- Minna Antrim

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken
seriously."
- Hubert H. Humphrey

"The idea that you can merchandise candidates for high office like breakfast
cereal--that you can gather votes like box tops--is, I think, the ultimate
indignity to the democratic process."
- Adlai Stevenson





"M.W.Smith" wrote in message
...
PJ DiSanti wrote:

Now that Atkins is dead do you think this company will take on to the
idea,
as the Scientologists have, to sell future editions of Atkins books with
the
phrase, Based on the teachings of Robert Atkins... etc?

Only they will add new information or Tech, in Scientology parlance,
specifically when they find new products to shill?

I mean Atkins himself was selling out in the end, the last version of
his
book was the first to accept "sugar free" sugar alcohol products as safe
for
the low carber, coincidentally just before releasing his own sugar free
sugar alcohol products.

Now that it's more a corporation rather than a living person's
reputation on
the line, should we expect a major push of products down our throat ala
Dr.
Phil... oh wait... Dr. Phil is living isn't he, I guess we should debate
if
he's a person... no matter ya'll get my point.

No. What is your point? Research on the effectiveness of the
Atkins diet and similar ones is increasing. Results are
showing that the low carbohydrate approach to losing weight
is effective for many people. Assuming the research
continues to show the Atkins approach is effective, then,
obviously, people will develop and market new products to
satisfy the increased demand for them. That's fundamental
economics.

martin

PJ DiSanti wrote:

You're a troll, I think no matter what I post you've made it your mission to
auto-contradict anything I write, so I think you should get cancer of the
cock and have it removed without anesthesia. You are killfiled.

That *is* funny. You *are* a comedian. I think I'm in your
killfile twice now.

martin

Make that three times.

PJ

--

"The very aim and end of our institutions is just this: that we may think
what we like and say what we think."
- Oliver Wendell Holmes

"To be loved is to be fortunate, but to be hated is to achieve distinction."
- Minna Antrim

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken
seriously."
- Hubert H. Humphrey

"The idea that you can merchandise candidates for high office like breakfast
cereal--that you can gather votes like box tops--is, I think, the ultimate
indignity to the democratic process."
- Adlai Stevenson





"M.W.Smith" wrote in message
...
PJ DiSanti wrote:

You're a troll, I think no matter what I post you've made it your
mission to
auto-contradict anything I write, so I think you should get cancer of
the
cock and have it removed without anesthesia. You are killfiled.

That *is* funny. You *are* a comedian. I think I'm in your
killfile twice now.

martin

PJ DiSanti wrote:

Make that three times.

Apparently you failed the first two times then. Pilot error.
Or were you lying?

martin

Lying to you doesn't really count as lying, considering you're not really a
person.

PJ

--

"The very aim and end of our institutions is just this: that we may think
what we like and say what we think."
- Oliver Wendell Holmes

"To be loved is to be fortunate, but to be hated is to achieve distinction."
- Minna Antrim

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken
seriously."
- Hubert H. Humphrey

"The idea that you can merchandise candidates for high office like breakfast
cereal--that you can gather votes like box tops--is, I think, the ultimate
indignity to the democratic process."
- Adlai Stevenson





"M.W.Smith" wrote in message
...
PJ DiSanti wrote:

Make that three times.

Apparently you failed the first two times then. Pilot error.
Or were you lying?

martin

PJ DiSanti wrote:

Lying to you doesn't really count as lying, considering you're not really a
person.

I see you still haven't put me in your killfile after three tries. Is there
anything I can do to help you get it right?

I know I'm not really a person. It's a Buddhist thing.

martin

PJ DiSanti wrote:

Make that three times.

heh heh .. nice to know it works ..

I know mine doesn't :|

No I didn't killfile you - cross posters specific addresses

--
Kitty =^..^=
168/156.6/130 - November Goal 155
17 September 03
caloric needs visit http://www.femalemuscle.com/nutrition/calculate.html