A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » General Discussion
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fat Chicks at Beaches and Water Parks



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 6th, 2005, 01:44 PM
The Cunning Linguist :Þ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fat Chicks at Beaches and Water Parks

There needs to be some kind of legislation regulating how muck skin some of
these poster girls for cottage cheese can show. It should be based on the
Body Mass Index that doctors use. If they are at or below the recommended
BMI, they can wear thongs or whatever they want. For each increment above
it, a larger percentage of skin must be covered. Above a certain level, they
should be banned from these areas
This is the kind of important stuff government needs to work on, not stupid
**** like gay marriage and stem cells


  #2  
Old June 6th, 2005, 02:58 PM
lab~rat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:44:39 GMT, "The Cunning Linguist :Þ"
puked:

There needs to be some kind of legislation regulating how muck skin some of
these poster girls for cottage cheese can show. It should be based on the
Body Mass Index that doctors use. If they are at or below the recommended
BMI, they can wear thongs or whatever they want. For each increment above
it, a larger percentage of skin must be covered. Above a certain level, they
should be banned from these areas
This is the kind of important stuff government needs to work on, not stupid
**** like gay marriage and stem cells


Why not just round them up and force them to exercise and diet at
gunpoint. Then everyone will be happier.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
  #3  
Old June 6th, 2005, 04:13 PM
Foxglove Adams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"The Cunning Linguist :Þ" wrote in message
...
There needs to be some kind of legislation regulating how muck skin some

of
these poster girls for cottage cheese can show. It should be based on the
Body Mass Index that doctors use. If they are at or below the recommended
BMI, they can wear thongs or whatever they want. For each increment above
it, a larger percentage of skin must be covered. Above a certain level,

they
should be banned from these areas
This is the kind of important stuff government needs to work on, not

stupid
**** like gay marriage and stem cells


Funny, that's how I feel about brainless men with tiny cocks and big mouths.


  #4  
Old June 6th, 2005, 04:30 PM
Lefty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Cunning Linguist :=DE wrote:
There needs to be some kind of legislation regulating how muck skin some =

of
these poster girls for cottage cheese can show. It should be based on the
Body Mass Index that doctors use. If they are at or below the recommended
BMI, they can wear thongs or whatever they want. For each increment above
it, a larger percentage of skin must be covered. Above a certain level, t=

hey
should be banned from these areas
This is the kind of important stuff government needs to work on, not stup=

id
**** like gay marriage and stem cells




I note that you propose this for women only, not for men. I think I
know why. In my experience, men who hate fat women tend to be fat
themselves. It's really self-hatred turned outward. Statistically,
there are more fat men than fat women.
So lose the blubber before you spout off, boy. Do you think chicks like
looking at your huge hairy beer gut?

  #5  
Old June 6th, 2005, 05:05 PM
doomella
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jack Jones" wrote in message
...
"The Cunning Linguist :Þ" wrote:

There needs to be some kind of legislation regulating how muck skin some

of
these poster girls for cottage cheese can show. It should be based on the
Body Mass Index that doctors use. If they are at or below the recommended
BMI, they can wear thongs or whatever they want. For each increment above
it, a larger percentage of skin must be covered. Above a certain level,

they
should be banned from these areas


You should visit a nude beach some time. Yikes, nothing more scary than a
huge, naked whale with a giant bush you can barely see under the mounds of
flab.


Yep. The women tend not to look so hot either.


  #6  
Old June 6th, 2005, 05:32 PM
lab~rat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:13:24 GMT, "Foxglove Adams"
puked:


"The Cunning Linguist :Þ" wrote in message
...
There needs to be some kind of legislation regulating how muck skin some

of
these poster girls for cottage cheese can show. It should be based on the
Body Mass Index that doctors use. If they are at or below the recommended
BMI, they can wear thongs or whatever they want. For each increment above
it, a larger percentage of skin must be covered. Above a certain level,

they
should be banned from these areas
This is the kind of important stuff government needs to work on, not

stupid
**** like gay marriage and stem cells


Funny, that's how I feel about brainless men with tiny cocks and big mouths.


How much do you weigh?
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
  #7  
Old June 6th, 2005, 05:33 PM
lab~rat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 6 Jun 2005 08:30:07 -0700, "Lefty"
puked:

The Cunning Linguist :Þ wrote:
There needs to be some kind of legislation regulating how muck skin some of
these poster girls for cottage cheese can show. It should be based on the
Body Mass Index that doctors use. If they are at or below the recommended
BMI, they can wear thongs or whatever they want. For each increment above
it, a larger percentage of skin must be covered. Above a certain level, they
should be banned from these areas
This is the kind of important stuff government needs to work on, not stupid
**** like gay marriage and stem cells




I note that you propose this for women only, not for men. I think I
know why. In my experience, men who hate fat women tend to be fat
themselves. It's really self-hatred turned outward. Statistically,
there are more fat men than fat women.


That sounds like bull**** to me.

So lose the blubber before you spout off, boy. Do you think chicks like
looking at your huge hairy beer gut?


I don't like looking at guys at all. Let's make a compromise and say
everyone but hot chicks should wear Burkahs...
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
  #8  
Old June 6th, 2005, 05:42 PM
Lefty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's not bull****.

"# Overweight prevalence statistics for men in the USA:

* 58% of men aged 20-34 are overweight in the US 1999-2000 (Health
United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 67.6% of men aged 35-44 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 71.3% of men aged 45-54 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 72.5% of men aged 55-64 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 77.2% of men aged 65-74 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 66.4% of men aged over 75 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)

# Overweight prevalence statistics for women in the USA:

* 51.5% of women aged 20-34 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 63.6% of women aged 35-44 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 64.7% of women aged 45-54 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 73.1% of women aged 55-64 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 70.1% of women aged 65-74 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
* 59.6% of women aged over 75 are overweight in the US 1999-2000
(Health United States, 2003, NCHS)
# 50% of women aged 20 to 74 are overweight or obese in the US (The
National Women's Health Information Center)"

http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/o/overweight/stats.htm

  #9  
Old June 6th, 2005, 05:45 PM
Lefty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"that's a pointless question if you do not know how tall the person
is...

a 200 lbs 6'3" person would be fine, a 200 lbs 5'1" person would be
rather fat. "

Indeed. Also, body composition is important. A very muscular person
will weigh a lot more than a flabby person. Muscle weighs more than fat.

  #10  
Old June 6th, 2005, 06:04 PM
k
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ignoramus23410" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:32:16 GMT, lab~rat wrote:
Funny, that's how I feel about brainless men with tiny cocks and big

mouths.


How much do you weigh?


that's a pointless question if you do not know how tall the person
is...

a 200 lbs 6'3" person would be fine, a 200 lbs 5'1" person would be
rather fat.


My daughter is 12 and knows 3 girls already suffering from or recovering
from bulemia. They were slim, but boys kept calling them "fat" Men learn
early that's a way to crush a woman no matter how beautiful or smart she is,
then they have the upper hand. **** the morons!

Anyway, one of the little girls got so skinny her belly bloated. They told
her she was "fat" in the belly. She almost died.

k


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.