Where are all the thin poeple from Atkins first book?

MU wrote:

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

Perhaps, you do not know how the computer program "FitDay" enters data.

Most certainly do and FitDay has its own share of irregularities.

Btw, did you count the cals that "passed thru" undigested? Did you eat
exactly 2.2 grams of beans or was it 2.9 or was it 1.6 avoirdupois. And
did each and every bean have exactly the same cals per unit of weight?

And on and on and on........

Perhaps ****skull MU_gly didn't notice that he didn't quote me above.
Actually, he quoted himself. But why would he start being intelligent
now? I didn't write anything above. A real heavyweight, is MU_le.
Can't even keep track of who he's trolling...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

And did you calibrate your scale to weight *EXACTLY* 2 pounds? But,
even if you did, it doesn't matter, based on your won words.

What won words? What did I win? A quadbypass like you?

LOL I know the burden you carry to make sense of a three-letter word
mistyped. Biiiiig stretch to actually figure it out.

BTW. I've told you several times it was a triple. Must be all those
meds you take that affect your memory and cognitive skills. Or, more
likely and irredeemably, genetics.

Funny thing how you say you can do it by eye nowadays. Kinda puts the
lie to all your pontificating about how inaccurate everybody else's
approaches are.

Do you notice that you evaded the question? Again. Can you not see
that every time you do that it makes your phoniness more apparent?
Makes your rather abysmal ignorance yet more clear? Makes your
trolling nature ever more obvious.

I don't know, Bobbie, I am fit, thin and more active than 99% of the
population.

Right. And we all have every reason to believe every word you post. Heh.

Tell us again about how you rolled around on the floor with impacted
feces to the point where you had to have surgery. And how you let it
go on for years before doing anything about it. Big brave soldier
couldn't face a doctor without hiding. Oh, please, please, kiss the
booboo, mommy. No wonder you only eat 2 pounds of food. You're afraid
to try to take a crap and afraid of the desperate embarrassment of
having an ass that works just as well as your brain.

Tell us all again how well you care for your body, faker. Tell us all
again how wonderful a specimen of manhood you are. Tell us again how
Chung is the cardiologist *for your whole family*. Your kids need a
cardiologist? Tell us again how to manage our bodies, meatwhistle.
Tell us again how to live our lives. But be sure to keep hiding behind
a fake identity. That makes you look real and sincere. ANd did I
mention knowledgeable?

You, otoh, are a TROLL who spends his time on cardiology
newsgrops with you're great "advice"......

LOL This illiterate prattle from somebody who gets on my case for
mistyping "own" as "won." I love the image of "newsgropes" and, in his
case with Chung, sounds about right. "You're" great advice is likewise
clear enough.

But this wasn't originally in a cardiology newsgroup. You made it one
by the crosspost. Better than ol' Joe Goebbels as a liar, you are...

on how to nearly kill yourself
with food overconsumed.

And you say you're not a scientist.... Bwah.

Tasty Pasorio food, yum yum......oops, got several
blockages there Bobbie; damn near dug your own grave. Then, as if to mock
both the surgeons who saved you, the God who decided not to take your
overplumped torso, you TROLL cardiology newsgroups foe funsies.

Actually, I read newsgroups to collect incoherent, illiterate,
rambling, diversionary, evasive, inane, irrelevant claptrap.
Congratulations on fitting into all the categories.

You really need to get a new tune, MU_cilage. This is old stuff, "B"
material at very best. And you know I'm "overplumped." LOL Never
seen me or a picture of me but you "know" it. Like Chung's getting
"truth" from his faith rather than logic. Or evidence. A perfect pair
you are...

Here's a clue-by-four to hit you with. For an insult to have any
currency, it has to contain some element of truth. So when I say
you're a rather unintelligent hack and a decided fraud, it's based on
what you've posted. When you call me fat through the several variants
you've used, it's based on the vacuum of your wishful thinking.

Here's a deal for you. Prove who you are and I'll post a picture of me
so you can see for yourself. If I'm fat, you'll have a wonderful time.
If not, well, everyone will still know you're a windbag so it won't
matter. And you can keep your $10,000 for mental health care.

MU_sic-from-beans, wacko/fraud that he is, wants to measure with a
micrometer, mark with chalk and cut with a hatchet. What a great
scientist.

Bobbie The Cardiology Troll

Too funny. MU_sh calls *anyone* else a troll. Hey, MU_ngbean, you
forgot to capitalize TROLL.

I am no scientist and never have acted like one. You, otoh, spout science
as if you were.

You most assuredly are no scientist and, despite your claims to be
able to understand scientific journals and papers, you prove it anew
each post. Sorry what I post is over your head. I mean since you're
certainly no scientist and all. Like this example of your
understanding of human biology below.

Which leads us back to the highly unscientific but hugely succesful

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

But... but... but Chung says it's perfectly logical even though he
eschews logic as interfering with truth. The program is so successful
that neither you nor Chung can offer anything to substantiate it. So
successful that you say it can be a lifetime dietary plan and has
*never* failed. *Never.* And it fits everybody equally, no matter
activity or size or age or anything. It fits *everybody*.

But there's no evidence for it anywhere. And these are two newsgroups
that are based on evidence and anecdotal information. Take your
choice... but no. Nothing forthcoming. Just like the Easter Bunny.
Just like phlogiston. Just like the Everest climber's menus. Just like
MU_lch's IQ.

Thank you and on to your next cardiac event. Keep us posted.

Love to. Haven't had any problems since the last century. Wise and
satisfying low-carb eating, riding the bike, walking, flexing the bow,
pushing the mower, riding horses, shooting guns and cool compound
bows, going to conferences all over the country, training my bonsai,
jumping out of perfectly good planes, raising a teenager, and
international travel just keeps me too busy to have cardiac events.

How about you tell us about your ass operation and how excruciating it
was before they manually removed that concrescent **** you're so full
of. I think of it as a kind of lobotomy for you. Or did they manage to
avoid your head during the surgery? Nice part in your hair...

Bob

MU wrote:

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

Perhaps, you do not know how the computer program "FitDay" enters data.

Most certainly do and FitDay has its own share of irregularities.

Btw, did you count the cals that "passed thru" undigested? Did you eat
exactly 2.2 grams of beans or was it 2.9 or was it 1.6 avoirdupois. And
did each and every bean have exactly the same cals per unit of weight?

And on and on and on........

Perhaps ****skull MU_gly didn't notice that he didn't quote me above.
Actually, he quoted himself. But why would he start being intelligent
now? I didn't write anything above. A real heavyweight, is MU_le.
Can't even keep track of who he's trolling...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

And did you calibrate your scale to weight *EXACTLY* 2 pounds? But,
even if you did, it doesn't matter, based on your won words.

What won words? What did I win? A quadbypass like you?

LOL I know the burden you carry to make sense of a three-letter word
mistyped. Biiiiig stretch to actually figure it out.

BTW. I've told you several times it was a triple. Must be all those
meds you take that affect your memory and cognitive skills. Or, more
likely and irredeemably, genetics.

Funny thing how you say you can do it by eye nowadays. Kinda puts the
lie to all your pontificating about how inaccurate everybody else's
approaches are.

Do you notice that you evaded the question? Again. Can you not see
that every time you do that it makes your phoniness more apparent?
Makes your rather abysmal ignorance yet more clear? Makes your
trolling nature ever more obvious.

I don't know, Bobbie, I am fit, thin and more active than 99% of the
population.

Right. And we all have every reason to believe every word you post. Heh.

Tell us again about how you rolled around on the floor with impacted
feces to the point where you had to have surgery. And how you let it
go on for years before doing anything about it. Big brave soldier
couldn't face a doctor without hiding. Oh, please, please, kiss the
booboo, mommy. No wonder you only eat 2 pounds of food. You're afraid
to try to take a crap and afraid of the desperate embarrassment of
having an ass that works just as well as your brain.

Tell us all again how well you care for your body, faker. Tell us all
again how wonderful a specimen of manhood you are. Tell us again how
Chung is the cardiologist *for your whole family*. Your kids need a
cardiologist? Tell us again how to manage our bodies, meatwhistle.
Tell us again how to live our lives. But be sure to keep hiding behind
a fake identity. That makes you look real and sincere. ANd did I
mention knowledgeable?

You, otoh, are a TROLL who spends his time on cardiology
newsgrops with you're great "advice"......

LOL This illiterate prattle from somebody who gets on my case for
mistyping "own" as "won." I love the image of "newsgropes" and, in his
case with Chung, sounds about right. "You're" great advice is likewise
clear enough.

But this wasn't originally in a cardiology newsgroup. You made it one
by the crosspost. Better than ol' Joe Goebbels as a liar, you are...

on how to nearly kill yourself
with food overconsumed.

And you say you're not a scientist.... Bwah.

Tasty Pasorio food, yum yum......oops, got several
blockages there Bobbie; damn near dug your own grave. Then, as if to mock
both the surgeons who saved you, the God who decided not to take your
overplumped torso, you TROLL cardiology newsgroups foe funsies.

Actually, I read newsgroups to collect incoherent, illiterate,
rambling, diversionary, evasive, inane, irrelevant claptrap.
Congratulations on fitting into all the categories.

You really need to get a new tune, MU_cilage. This is old stuff, "B"
material at very best. And you know I'm "overplumped." LOL Never
seen me or a picture of me but you "know" it. Like Chung's getting
"truth" from his faith rather than logic. Or evidence. A perfect pair
you are...

Here's a clue-by-four to hit you with. For an insult to have any
currency, it has to contain some element of truth. So when I say
you're a rather unintelligent hack and a decided fraud, it's based on
what you've posted. When you call me fat through the several variants
you've used, it's based on the vacuum of your wishful thinking.

Here's a deal for you. Prove who you are and I'll post a picture of me
so you can see for yourself. If I'm fat, you'll have a wonderful time.
If not, well, everyone will still know you're a windbag so it won't
matter. And you can keep your $10,000 for mental health care.

MU_sic-from-beans, wacko/fraud that he is, wants to measure with a
micrometer, mark with chalk and cut with a hatchet. What a great
scientist.

Bobbie The Cardiology Troll

Too funny. MU_sh calls *anyone* else a troll. Hey, MU_ngbean, you
forgot to capitalize TROLL.

I am no scientist and never have acted like one. You, otoh, spout science
as if you were.

You most assuredly are no scientist and, despite your claims to be
able to understand scientific journals and papers, you prove it anew
each post. Sorry what I post is over your head. I mean since you're
certainly no scientist and all. Like this example of your
understanding of human biology below.

Which leads us back to the highly unscientific but hugely succesful

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

But... but... but Chung says it's perfectly logical even though he
eschews logic as interfering with truth. The program is so successful
that neither you nor Chung can offer anything to substantiate it. So
successful that you say it can be a lifetime dietary plan and has
*never* failed. *Never.* And it fits everybody equally, no matter
activity or size or age or anything. It fits *everybody*.

But there's no evidence for it anywhere. And these are two newsgroups
that are based on evidence and anecdotal information. Take your
choice... but no. Nothing forthcoming. Just like the Easter Bunny.
Just like phlogiston. Just like the Everest climber's menus. Just like
MU_lch's IQ.

Thank you and on to your next cardiac event. Keep us posted.

Love to. Haven't had any problems since the last century. Wise and
satisfying low-carb eating, riding the bike, walking, flexing the bow,
pushing the mower, riding horses, shooting guns and cool compound
bows, going to conferences all over the country, training my bonsai,
jumping out of perfectly good planes, raising a teenager, and
international travel just keeps me too busy to have cardiac events.

How about you tell us about your ass operation and how excruciating it
was before they manually removed that concrescent **** you're so full
of. I think of it as a kind of lobotomy for you. Or did they manage to
avoid your head during the surgery? Nice part in your hair...

Bob

MU wrote:

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

Perhaps, you do not know how the computer program "FitDay" enters data.

Most certainly do and FitDay has its own share of irregularities.

Btw, did you count the cals that "passed thru" undigested? Did you eat
exactly 2.2 grams of beans or was it 2.9 or was it 1.6 avoirdupois. And
did each and every bean have exactly the same cals per unit of weight?

And on and on and on........

Perhaps ****skull MU_gly didn't notice that he didn't quote me above.
Actually, he quoted himself. But why would he start being intelligent
now? I didn't write anything above. A real heavyweight, is MU_le.
Can't even keep track of who he's trolling...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

And did you calibrate your scale to weight *EXACTLY* 2 pounds? But,
even if you did, it doesn't matter, based on your won words.

What won words? What did I win? A quadbypass like you?

LOL I know the burden you carry to make sense of a three-letter word
mistyped. Biiiiig stretch to actually figure it out.

BTW. I've told you several times it was a triple. Must be all those
meds you take that affect your memory and cognitive skills. Or, more
likely and irredeemably, genetics.

Funny thing how you say you can do it by eye nowadays. Kinda puts the
lie to all your pontificating about how inaccurate everybody else's
approaches are.

Do you notice that you evaded the question? Again. Can you not see
that every time you do that it makes your phoniness more apparent?
Makes your rather abysmal ignorance yet more clear? Makes your
trolling nature ever more obvious.

I don't know, Bobbie, I am fit, thin and more active than 99% of the
population.

Right. And we all have every reason to believe every word you post. Heh.

Tell us again about how you rolled around on the floor with impacted
feces to the point where you had to have surgery. And how you let it
go on for years before doing anything about it. Big brave soldier
couldn't face a doctor without hiding. Oh, please, please, kiss the
booboo, mommy. No wonder you only eat 2 pounds of food. You're afraid
to try to take a crap and afraid of the desperate embarrassment of
having an ass that works just as well as your brain.

Tell us all again how well you care for your body, faker. Tell us all
again how wonderful a specimen of manhood you are. Tell us again how
Chung is the cardiologist *for your whole family*. Your kids need a
cardiologist? Tell us again how to manage our bodies, meatwhistle.
Tell us again how to live our lives. But be sure to keep hiding behind
a fake identity. That makes you look real and sincere. ANd did I
mention knowledgeable?

You, otoh, are a TROLL who spends his time on cardiology
newsgrops with you're great "advice"......

LOL This illiterate prattle from somebody who gets on my case for
mistyping "own" as "won." I love the image of "newsgropes" and, in his
case with Chung, sounds about right. "You're" great advice is likewise
clear enough.

But this wasn't originally in a cardiology newsgroup. You made it one
by the crosspost. Better than ol' Joe Goebbels as a liar, you are...

on how to nearly kill yourself
with food overconsumed.

And you say you're not a scientist.... Bwah.

Tasty Pasorio food, yum yum......oops, got several
blockages there Bobbie; damn near dug your own grave. Then, as if to mock
both the surgeons who saved you, the God who decided not to take your
overplumped torso, you TROLL cardiology newsgroups foe funsies.

Actually, I read newsgroups to collect incoherent, illiterate,
rambling, diversionary, evasive, inane, irrelevant claptrap.
Congratulations on fitting into all the categories.

You really need to get a new tune, MU_cilage. This is old stuff, "B"
material at very best. And you know I'm "overplumped." LOL Never
seen me or a picture of me but you "know" it. Like Chung's getting
"truth" from his faith rather than logic. Or evidence. A perfect pair
you are...

Here's a clue-by-four to hit you with. For an insult to have any
currency, it has to contain some element of truth. So when I say
you're a rather unintelligent hack and a decided fraud, it's based on
what you've posted. When you call me fat through the several variants
you've used, it's based on the vacuum of your wishful thinking.

Here's a deal for you. Prove who you are and I'll post a picture of me
so you can see for yourself. If I'm fat, you'll have a wonderful time.
If not, well, everyone will still know you're a windbag so it won't
matter. And you can keep your $10,000 for mental health care.

MU_sic-from-beans, wacko/fraud that he is, wants to measure with a
micrometer, mark with chalk and cut with a hatchet. What a great
scientist.

Bobbie The Cardiology Troll

Too funny. MU_sh calls *anyone* else a troll. Hey, MU_ngbean, you
forgot to capitalize TROLL.

I am no scientist and never have acted like one. You, otoh, spout science
as if you were.

You most assuredly are no scientist and, despite your claims to be
able to understand scientific journals and papers, you prove it anew
each post. Sorry what I post is over your head. I mean since you're
certainly no scientist and all. Like this example of your
understanding of human biology below.

Which leads us back to the highly unscientific but hugely succesful

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

But... but... but Chung says it's perfectly logical even though he
eschews logic as interfering with truth. The program is so successful
that neither you nor Chung can offer anything to substantiate it. So
successful that you say it can be a lifetime dietary plan and has
*never* failed. *Never.* And it fits everybody equally, no matter
activity or size or age or anything. It fits *everybody*.

But there's no evidence for it anywhere. And these are two newsgroups
that are based on evidence and anecdotal information. Take your
choice... but no. Nothing forthcoming. Just like the Easter Bunny.
Just like phlogiston. Just like the Everest climber's menus. Just like
MU_lch's IQ.

Thank you and on to your next cardiac event. Keep us posted.

Love to. Haven't had any problems since the last century. Wise and
satisfying low-carb eating, riding the bike, walking, flexing the bow,
pushing the mower, riding horses, shooting guns and cool compound
bows, going to conferences all over the country, training my bonsai,
jumping out of perfectly good planes, raising a teenager, and
international travel just keeps me too busy to have cardiac events.

How about you tell us about your ass operation and how excruciating it
was before they manually removed that concrescent **** you're so full
of. I think of it as a kind of lobotomy for you. Or did they manage to
avoid your head during the surgery? Nice part in your hair...

Bob

JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Rob" wrote in message
...

JC Der Koenig wrote:

Where are those jpegs?



Hope this link works.



http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/che...&.dnm=ba73.jpg


You're in decent shape, now all you have to do is learn that there is more
than one way to get there.




.... but only one way to stay there. Those that fail using the Food
Pyramid, Low Fat and Low Carb all fail from not controlling portions.
Calories consumed = Calories burned.

JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Rob" wrote in message
...

JC Der Koenig wrote:

Where are those jpegs?



Hope this link works.



http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/che...&.dnm=ba73.jpg


You're in decent shape, now all you have to do is learn that there is more
than one way to get there.




.... but only one way to stay there. Those that fail using the Food
Pyramid, Low Fat and Low Carb all fail from not controlling portions.
Calories consumed = Calories burned.

"Rob" wrote in message
...
JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Rob" wrote in message
...

JC Der Koenig wrote:

Where are those jpegs?



Hope this link works.




http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/che...&.dnm=ba73.jpg


You're in decent shape, now all you have to do is learn that there is
more
than one way to get there.




... but only one way to stay there. Those that fail using the Food
Pyramid, Low Fat and Low Carb all fail from not controlling portions.
Calories consumed = Calories burned.


Almost.

Calorie consumed = Calories used + Calories stored (where Calories stored
may be zero or a negative value)

Or were you trying to convey that ideally the amount of calories consumed
should equal the amount of calories used?

"Rob" wrote in message
...
JC Der Koenig wrote:

"Rob" wrote in message
...

JC Der Koenig wrote:

Where are those jpegs?



Hope this link works.




http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/che...&.dnm=ba73.jpg


You're in decent shape, now all you have to do is learn that there is
more
than one way to get there.




... but only one way to stay there. Those that fail using the Food
Pyramid, Low Fat and Low Carb all fail from not controlling portions.
Calories consumed = Calories burned.


Almost.

Calorie consumed = Calories used + Calories stored (where Calories stored
may be zero or a negative value)

Or were you trying to convey that ideally the amount of calories consumed
should equal the amount of calories used?

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:16:13 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:
Bob, Bob, I wrote a lot of that below but I couldn't even begin to follow
all that flurry. Do you really think that I would even try? I never do
when you go out of control like this. You know that.

And if I don't read all that mess below, what chance is it that anyone else
does? Slim? None?

So you carry on and on and on and this, whatever-this-is below, is for
what? So you can get your jollies believing you have "won" some Usenet
quarrel.......that no one reads but you?

Well, I come and go and say my piece in the best of truth as I know it.

You, on the other hand, take a look again below and ask yourself why in the
world would you waste such time on something so incomprehensible?
================================================== ==============================


MU wrote:

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

Perhaps, you do not know how the computer program "FitDay" enters data.

Most certainly do and FitDay has its own share of irregularities.

Btw, did you count the cals that "passed thru" undigested? Did you eat
exactly 2.2 grams of beans or was it 2.9 or was it 1.6 avoirdupois. And
did each and every bean have exactly the same cals per unit of weight?

And on and on and on........

Perhaps ****skull MU_gly didn't notice that he didn't quote me above.
Actually, he quoted himself. But why would he start being intelligent
now? I didn't write anything above. A real heavyweight, is MU_le.
Can't even keep track of who he's trolling...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

And did you calibrate your scale to weight *EXACTLY* 2 pounds? But,
even if you did, it doesn't matter, based on your won words.

What won words? What did I win? A quadbypass like you?

LOL I know the burden you carry to make sense of a three-letter word
mistyped. Biiiiig stretch to actually figure it out.

BTW. I've told you several times it was a triple. Must be all those
meds you take that affect your memory and cognitive skills. Or, more
likely and irredeemably, genetics.

Funny thing how you say you can do it by eye nowadays. Kinda puts the
lie to all your pontificating about how inaccurate everybody else's
approaches are.

Do you notice that you evaded the question? Again. Can you not see
that every time you do that it makes your phoniness more apparent?
Makes your rather abysmal ignorance yet more clear? Makes your
trolling nature ever more obvious.

I don't know, Bobbie, I am fit, thin and more active than 99% of the
population.

Right. And we all have every reason to believe every word you post. Heh.

Tell us again about how you rolled around on the floor with impacted
feces to the point where you had to have surgery. And how you let it
go on for years before doing anything about it. Big brave soldier
couldn't face a doctor without hiding. Oh, please, please, kiss the
booboo, mommy. No wonder you only eat 2 pounds of food. You're afraid
to try to take a crap and afraid of the desperate embarrassment of
having an ass that works just as well as your brain.

Tell us all again how well you care for your body, faker. Tell us all
again how wonderful a specimen of manhood you are. Tell us again how
Chung is the cardiologist *for your whole family*. Your kids need a
cardiologist? Tell us again how to manage our bodies, meatwhistle.
Tell us again how to live our lives. But be sure to keep hiding behind
a fake identity. That makes you look real and sincere. ANd did I
mention knowledgeable?

You, otoh, are a TROLL who spends his time on cardiology
newsgrops with you're great "advice"......

LOL This illiterate prattle from somebody who gets on my case for
mistyping "own" as "won." I love the image of "newsgropes" and, in his
case with Chung, sounds about right. "You're" great advice is likewise
clear enough.

But this wasn't originally in a cardiology newsgroup. You made it one
by the crosspost. Better than ol' Joe Goebbels as a liar, you are...

on how to nearly kill yourself
with food overconsumed.

And you say you're not a scientist.... Bwah.

Tasty Pasorio food, yum yum......oops, got several
blockages there Bobbie; damn near dug your own grave. Then, as if to mock
both the surgeons who saved you, the God who decided not to take your
overplumped torso, you TROLL cardiology newsgroups foe funsies.

Actually, I read newsgroups to collect incoherent, illiterate,
rambling, diversionary, evasive, inane, irrelevant claptrap.
Congratulations on fitting into all the categories.

You really need to get a new tune, MU_cilage. This is old stuff, "B"
material at very best. And you know I'm "overplumped." LOL Never
seen me or a picture of me but you "know" it. Like Chung's getting
"truth" from his faith rather than logic. Or evidence. A perfect pair
you are...

Here's a clue-by-four to hit you with. For an insult to have any
currency, it has to contain some element of truth. So when I say
you're a rather unintelligent hack and a decided fraud, it's based on
what you've posted. When you call me fat through the several variants
you've used, it's based on the vacuum of your wishful thinking.

Here's a deal for you. Prove who you are and I'll post a picture of me
so you can see for yourself. If I'm fat, you'll have a wonderful time.
If not, well, everyone will still know you're a windbag so it won't
matter. And you can keep your $10,000 for mental health care.

MU_sic-from-beans, wacko/fraud that he is, wants to measure with a
micrometer, mark with chalk and cut with a hatchet. What a great
scientist.

Bobbie The Cardiology Troll

Too funny. MU_sh calls *anyone* else a troll. Hey, MU_ngbean, you
forgot to capitalize TROLL.

I am no scientist and never have acted like one. You, otoh, spout science
as if you were.

You most assuredly are no scientist and, despite your claims to be
able to understand scientific journals and papers, you prove it anew
each post. Sorry what I post is over your head. I mean since you're
certainly no scientist and all. Like this example of your
understanding of human biology below.

Which leads us back to the highly unscientific but hugely succesful

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

But... but... but Chung says it's perfectly logical even though he
eschews logic as interfering with truth. The program is so successful
that neither you nor Chung can offer anything to substantiate it. So
successful that you say it can be a lifetime dietary plan and has
*never* failed. *Never.* And it fits everybody equally, no matter
activity or size or age or anything. It fits *everybody*.

But there's no evidence for it anywhere. And these are two newsgroups
that are based on evidence and anecdotal information. Take your
choice... but no. Nothing forthcoming. Just like the Easter Bunny.
Just like phlogiston. Just like the Everest climber's menus. Just like
MU_lch's IQ.

Thank you and on to your next cardiac event. Keep us posted.

Love to. Haven't had any problems since the last century. Wise and
satisfying low-carb eating, riding the bike, walking, flexing the bow,
pushing the mower, riding horses, shooting guns and cool compound
bows, going to conferences all over the country, training my bonsai,
jumping out of perfectly good planes, raising a teenager, and
international travel just keeps me too busy to have cardiac events.

How about you tell us about your ass operation and how excruciating it
was before they manually removed that concrescent **** you're so full
of. I think of it as a kind of lobotomy for you. Or did they manage to
avoid your head during the surgery? Nice part in your hair...

Bob

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:16:13 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:
Bob, Bob, I wrote a lot of that below but I couldn't even begin to follow
all that flurry. Do you really think that I would even try? I never do
when you go out of control like this. You know that.

And if I don't read all that mess below, what chance is it that anyone else
does? Slim? None?

So you carry on and on and on and this, whatever-this-is below, is for
what? So you can get your jollies believing you have "won" some Usenet
quarrel.......that no one reads but you?

Well, I come and go and say my piece in the best of truth as I know it.

You, on the other hand, take a look again below and ask yourself why in the
world would you waste such time on something so incomprehensible?
================================================== ==============================


MU wrote:

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

Perhaps, you do not know how the computer program "FitDay" enters data.

Most certainly do and FitDay has its own share of irregularities.

Btw, did you count the cals that "passed thru" undigested? Did you eat
exactly 2.2 grams of beans or was it 2.9 or was it 1.6 avoirdupois. And
did each and every bean have exactly the same cals per unit of weight?

And on and on and on........

Perhaps ****skull MU_gly didn't notice that he didn't quote me above.
Actually, he quoted himself. But why would he start being intelligent
now? I didn't write anything above. A real heavyweight, is MU_le.
Can't even keep track of who he's trolling...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

And did you calibrate your scale to weight *EXACTLY* 2 pounds? But,
even if you did, it doesn't matter, based on your won words.

What won words? What did I win? A quadbypass like you?

LOL I know the burden you carry to make sense of a three-letter word
mistyped. Biiiiig stretch to actually figure it out.

BTW. I've told you several times it was a triple. Must be all those
meds you take that affect your memory and cognitive skills. Or, more
likely and irredeemably, genetics.

Funny thing how you say you can do it by eye nowadays. Kinda puts the
lie to all your pontificating about how inaccurate everybody else's
approaches are.

Do you notice that you evaded the question? Again. Can you not see
that every time you do that it makes your phoniness more apparent?
Makes your rather abysmal ignorance yet more clear? Makes your
trolling nature ever more obvious.

I don't know, Bobbie, I am fit, thin and more active than 99% of the
population.

Right. And we all have every reason to believe every word you post. Heh.

Tell us again about how you rolled around on the floor with impacted
feces to the point where you had to have surgery. And how you let it
go on for years before doing anything about it. Big brave soldier
couldn't face a doctor without hiding. Oh, please, please, kiss the
booboo, mommy. No wonder you only eat 2 pounds of food. You're afraid
to try to take a crap and afraid of the desperate embarrassment of
having an ass that works just as well as your brain.

Tell us all again how well you care for your body, faker. Tell us all
again how wonderful a specimen of manhood you are. Tell us again how
Chung is the cardiologist *for your whole family*. Your kids need a
cardiologist? Tell us again how to manage our bodies, meatwhistle.
Tell us again how to live our lives. But be sure to keep hiding behind
a fake identity. That makes you look real and sincere. ANd did I
mention knowledgeable?

You, otoh, are a TROLL who spends his time on cardiology
newsgrops with you're great "advice"......

LOL This illiterate prattle from somebody who gets on my case for
mistyping "own" as "won." I love the image of "newsgropes" and, in his
case with Chung, sounds about right. "You're" great advice is likewise
clear enough.

But this wasn't originally in a cardiology newsgroup. You made it one
by the crosspost. Better than ol' Joe Goebbels as a liar, you are...

on how to nearly kill yourself
with food overconsumed.

And you say you're not a scientist.... Bwah.

Tasty Pasorio food, yum yum......oops, got several
blockages there Bobbie; damn near dug your own grave. Then, as if to mock
both the surgeons who saved you, the God who decided not to take your
overplumped torso, you TROLL cardiology newsgroups foe funsies.

Actually, I read newsgroups to collect incoherent, illiterate,
rambling, diversionary, evasive, inane, irrelevant claptrap.
Congratulations on fitting into all the categories.

You really need to get a new tune, MU_cilage. This is old stuff, "B"
material at very best. And you know I'm "overplumped." LOL Never
seen me or a picture of me but you "know" it. Like Chung's getting
"truth" from his faith rather than logic. Or evidence. A perfect pair
you are...

Here's a clue-by-four to hit you with. For an insult to have any
currency, it has to contain some element of truth. So when I say
you're a rather unintelligent hack and a decided fraud, it's based on
what you've posted. When you call me fat through the several variants
you've used, it's based on the vacuum of your wishful thinking.

Here's a deal for you. Prove who you are and I'll post a picture of me
so you can see for yourself. If I'm fat, you'll have a wonderful time.
If not, well, everyone will still know you're a windbag so it won't
matter. And you can keep your $10,000 for mental health care.

MU_sic-from-beans, wacko/fraud that he is, wants to measure with a
micrometer, mark with chalk and cut with a hatchet. What a great
scientist.

Bobbie The Cardiology Troll

Too funny. MU_sh calls *anyone* else a troll. Hey, MU_ngbean, you
forgot to capitalize TROLL.

I am no scientist and never have acted like one. You, otoh, spout science
as if you were.

You most assuredly are no scientist and, despite your claims to be
able to understand scientific journals and papers, you prove it anew
each post. Sorry what I post is over your head. I mean since you're
certainly no scientist and all. Like this example of your
understanding of human biology below.

Which leads us back to the highly unscientific but hugely succesful

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

But... but... but Chung says it's perfectly logical even though he
eschews logic as interfering with truth. The program is so successful
that neither you nor Chung can offer anything to substantiate it. So
successful that you say it can be a lifetime dietary plan and has
*never* failed. *Never.* And it fits everybody equally, no matter
activity or size or age or anything. It fits *everybody*.

But there's no evidence for it anywhere. And these are two newsgroups
that are based on evidence and anecdotal information. Take your
choice... but no. Nothing forthcoming. Just like the Easter Bunny.
Just like phlogiston. Just like the Everest climber's menus. Just like
MU_lch's IQ.

Thank you and on to your next cardiac event. Keep us posted.

Love to. Haven't had any problems since the last century. Wise and
satisfying low-carb eating, riding the bike, walking, flexing the bow,
pushing the mower, riding horses, shooting guns and cool compound
bows, going to conferences all over the country, training my bonsai,
jumping out of perfectly good planes, raising a teenager, and
international travel just keeps me too busy to have cardiac events.

How about you tell us about your ass operation and how excruciating it
was before they manually removed that concrescent **** you're so full
of. I think of it as a kind of lobotomy for you. Or did they manage to
avoid your head during the surgery? Nice part in your hair...

Bob

MU wrote:

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:16:13 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

Bob, Bob, I wrote a lot of that below but I couldn't even begin to follow
all that flurry.

I know. That's why I did all that clarification for you. Just to help
you get your thoughts in some adult order. Think of it as a public
service.

Do you really think that I would even try?

No, I didn't really think you would or could. But one never knows.
Even most animals are smart enough to come in out of the rain.

And if I don't read all that mess below, what chance is it that anyone else
does? Slim? None?

LOL Right. I would certainly use you as the poster boy for attention
span. Here's a startling, new idea for you to ponder. Ready?

I don't really care if you read it. See how simple it can be?

I'm no more writing to you than you are to me. You write for your
entire crowd of fan. That's the sound of one pair of hands clapping.
Do you think I believe that you capitalize TROLL to communicate with
me? Can you be that stupid? Oh, wait...

I simply enjoy poking a few more holes in your Swiss-cheese logic.
It's grand fun pointing out your childlike blunders of incoherent
writing. It's good typing practice with precious little cogitation
needed to blow your crippled notions out of the water. It's a warm,
fuzzy feeling drawing attention to your most recent hypocritical
fraudulence. Since you have such a well-developed sense of integrity
and self-awareness. Like this exchange in another post today:

Someone wrote:
You're nothing but a stupid, blowhard or very, very ignorant troll.
You obviously have no self control and stay fat because you eat like a
pig. Or, who knows, maybe you just need to get laid? PMS? Mentally
ill? What other explanations could there be for someone so
irrationally bitter, hostile and jealous of others' success?

MU_gly replies:
Goodness, what a load of assumptions, I suppose you must know this
person in real time and if you do, what an unwarranted attack of such
a vile and personally directed nature.
end quote

I literally laughed out loud at the barefaced cheek this little note
contained. And at the rather stupidly constructed "sentence." YOu give
hypocrisy a bad name.

So you carry on and on and on and this, whatever-this-is below, is for
what? So you can get your jollies believing you have "won" some Usenet
quarrel.......that no one reads but you?

More of your hilarious assumptions. Just like your shilling the
2PoundPOWDiet with nothing but your assumptions to offer. Trolling
fool with nothing to contribute beyond a sour attitude and a virtual
encyclopedia of lies. What a fine legacy. I can see why you post
anonymously.

Well, I come and go and say my piece in the best of truth as I know it.

LOLOL You are a lying sack of ****. And I mean that in the nicest
possible way. You are a fraud, a dissembler, a poseur, a troll, a
spammer and a lamentably unintelligent writer.

You, on the other hand, take a look again below and ask yourself why in the
world would you waste such time on something so incomprehensible?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Comprehensibility is in the IQ
of the beholder. So sorry for you.

Does this mean you aren't going to tell us about your constipational,
years-long ass problems that you finally overcame your crushing
anxiety and consented to have surgery? It's such a heart-warming
story. And seat-warming.

And here I bought the Jumbo box of popcorn expecting the
feature-length bragging, self-aggrandizement and whiny sympathy-pitch
troll of your normal posts. What did they use to get all that impacted
crap out of you? Did it entail heavy equipment and actual miners?
Conveyor belts?

Bob


================================================== ==============================



MU wrote:


On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:


Perhaps, you do not know how the computer program "FitDay" enters data.

Most certainly do and FitDay has its own share of irregularities.

Btw, did you count the cals that "passed thru" undigested? Did you eat
exactly 2.2 grams of beans or was it 2.9 or was it 1.6 avoirdupois. And
did each and every bean have exactly the same cals per unit of weight?

And on and on and on........

Perhaps ****skull MU_gly didn't notice that he didn't quote me above.
Actually, he quoted himself. But why would he start being intelligent
now? I didn't write anything above. A real heavyweight, is MU_le.
Can't even keep track of who he's trolling...


On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:


And did you calibrate your scale to weight *EXACTLY* 2 pounds? But,
even if you did, it doesn't matter, based on your won words.

What won words? What did I win? A quadbypass like you?

LOL I know the burden you carry to make sense of a three-letter word
mistyped. Biiiiig stretch to actually figure it out.

BTW. I've told you several times it was a triple. Must be all those
meds you take that affect your memory and cognitive skills. Or, more
likely and irredeemably, genetics.


Funny thing how you say you can do it by eye nowadays. Kinda puts the
lie to all your pontificating about how inaccurate everybody else's
approaches are.

Do you notice that you evaded the question? Again. Can you not see
that every time you do that it makes your phoniness more apparent?
Makes your rather abysmal ignorance yet more clear? Makes your
trolling nature ever more obvious.


I don't know, Bobbie, I am fit, thin and more active than 99% of the
population.

Right. And we all have every reason to believe every word you post. Heh.

Tell us again about how you rolled around on the floor with impacted
feces to the point where you had to have surgery. And how you let it
go on for years before doing anything about it. Big brave soldier
couldn't face a doctor without hiding. Oh, please, please, kiss the
booboo, mommy. No wonder you only eat 2 pounds of food. You're afraid
to try to take a crap and afraid of the desperate embarrassment of
having an ass that works just as well as your brain.

Tell us all again how well you care for your body, faker. Tell us all
again how wonderful a specimen of manhood you are. Tell us again how
Chung is the cardiologist *for your whole family*. Your kids need a
cardiologist? Tell us again how to manage our bodies, meatwhistle.
Tell us again how to live our lives. But be sure to keep hiding behind
a fake identity. That makes you look real and sincere. ANd did I
mention knowledgeable?

You, otoh, are a TROLL who spends his time on cardiology

newsgrops with you're great "advice"......

LOL This illiterate prattle from somebody who gets on my case for
mistyping "own" as "won." I love the image of "newsgropes" and, in his
case with Chung, sounds about right. "You're" great advice is likewise
clear enough.

But this wasn't originally in a cardiology newsgroup. You made it one
by the crosspost. Better than ol' Joe Goebbels as a liar, you are...


on how to nearly kill yourself
with food overconsumed.

And you say you're not a scientist.... Bwah.


Tasty Pasorio food, yum yum......oops, got several
blockages there Bobbie; damn near dug your own grave. Then, as if to mock
both the surgeons who saved you, the God who decided not to take your
overplumped torso, you TROLL cardiology newsgroups foe funsies.

Actually, I read newsgroups to collect incoherent, illiterate,
rambling, diversionary, evasive, inane, irrelevant claptrap.
Congratulations on fitting into all the categories.

You really need to get a new tune, MU_cilage. This is old stuff, "B"
material at very best. And you know I'm "overplumped." LOL Never
seen me or a picture of me but you "know" it. Like Chung's getting
"truth" from his faith rather than logic. Or evidence. A perfect pair
you are...

Here's a clue-by-four to hit you with. For an insult to have any
currency, it has to contain some element of truth. So when I say
you're a rather unintelligent hack and a decided fraud, it's based on
what you've posted. When you call me fat through the several variants
you've used, it's based on the vacuum of your wishful thinking.

Here's a deal for you. Prove who you are and I'll post a picture of me
so you can see for yourself. If I'm fat, you'll have a wonderful time.
If not, well, everyone will still know you're a windbag so it won't
matter. And you can keep your $10,000 for mental health care.


MU_sic-from-beans, wacko/fraud that he is, wants to measure with a
micrometer, mark with chalk and cut with a hatchet. What a great
scientist.

Bobbie The Cardiology Troll

Too funny. MU_sh calls *anyone* else a troll. Hey, MU_ngbean, you
forgot to capitalize TROLL.


I am no scientist and never have acted like one. You, otoh, spout science
as if you were.

You most assuredly are no scientist and, despite your claims to be
able to understand scientific journals and papers, you prove it anew
each post. Sorry what I post is over your head. I mean since you're
certainly no scientist and all. Like this example of your
understanding of human biology below.


Which leads us back to the highly unscientific but hugely succesful

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

But... but... but Chung says it's perfectly logical even though he
eschews logic as interfering with truth. The program is so successful
that neither you nor Chung can offer anything to substantiate it. So
successful that you say it can be a lifetime dietary plan and has
*never* failed. *Never.* And it fits everybody equally, no matter
activity or size or age or anything. It fits *everybody*.

But there's no evidence for it anywhere. And these are two newsgroups
that are based on evidence and anecdotal information. Take your
choice... but no. Nothing forthcoming. Just like the Easter Bunny.
Just like phlogiston. Just like the Everest climber's menus. Just like
MU_lch's IQ.


Thank you and on to your next cardiac event. Keep us posted.

Love to. Haven't had any problems since the last century. Wise and
satisfying low-carb eating, riding the bike, walking, flexing the bow,
pushing the mower, riding horses, shooting guns and cool compound
bows, going to conferences all over the country, training my bonsai,
jumping out of perfectly good planes, raising a teenager, and
international travel just keeps me too busy to have cardiac events.

How about you tell us about your ass operation and how excruciating it
was before they manually removed that concrescent **** you're so full
of. I think of it as a kind of lobotomy for you. Or did they manage to
avoid your head during the surgery? Nice part in your hair...

Bob