There may be problems with Splenda

You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm

You're an idiot.

--
"If I can't *count* the carbs, it can't be part of a
low-carb diet." --- jpatti


"Jean Staffen" wrote in message
...
You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm

lamo


"JC Der Koenig" wrote in message
om...
You're an idiot.

--
"If I can't *count* the carbs, it can't be part of a
low-carb diet." --- jpatti


"Jean Staffen" wrote in message
...
You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm

"Jean Staffen" wrote in message
...
You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm


Oh, crap! And I just bought a big bag of Splenda to make cheesecake for
Easter Sunday...

It's hard to sift through all of the info and to really know what's true and
what's shinola. There was a reference to saccharin ("...I feel saccharin is
the only artificial sweetener with true merit") in one of the articles on
the site. Some thirty odd years ago, science concluded that saccharin was
carcinogenic. So, who to believe?

Linda
296/244/160
LC since Oct. 13, 2003

"Jean Staffen" wrote in message
...
You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm



look at the source. not exactly "trustworthy".

http://www.quackwatch.org/12Web/webindex.html

-kelly

"metta" wrote in message
...

look at the source. not exactly "trustworthy".

http://www.quackwatch.org/12Web/webindex.html


here's an interesting article from someone who actually likes Mercola's
info, but still thinks the Splenda thing is silly:

http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/5/5/24155/41542

-kelly

Mercola is notorious for being "against" EVERYTHING. I treat any info or
reference from their site as appropriate for the circular filing cabinet
(trash can).

--
Phyllis
Started 7/31/01
185/149/130 5'-1.25"
WAS 185/141 fr. 8/02-6/03
"metta" wrote in message
...

"Jean Staffen" wrote in message
...
You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm



look at the source. not exactly "trustworthy".

http://www.quackwatch.org/12Web/webindex.html

-kelly

Jean Staffen wrote:
You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm

It's all chenmical crap. Of course it's not good for us. No different than
aspartame if you ask me. In a few years after Splenda is around a while
we'll hear about all the dangers of it. To be honest I'm surprised at alot
of the purists here who put down all the low carb crap yet eat surcralose.
It's beyond me.
Monica


--
Started 01/20/04
362/321.6/250
__________________________________________________ ______
"Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover
what they lack. - Harry Emerson Fosdick




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/04

So, who to believe?

Mercola seems to have a personal vendetta against Splenda. I can't find anyone
else bashing it.

LCing since 12/01/03-
Me- 5'7" 265/216/140
& hubby- 6' 310/234/180

On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 02:12:03 GMT, "Jean Staffen"
wrote:

You decide.

http://mercola.com/2004/mar/31/splenda_reaction.htm

I have been having such a difficult time on my walk of late because I
keep tripping over the bodies of those killed by splenda, and those
****in' cripples from its use are such a pain!
Quack........ Quack............ Quack.........

Your Pal,

Sleepy


____________________________________
The True Axis of Evil
Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Rumsfeld
____________________________________