WHEN YOU SEE A TOTAL ECLIPSE.......

..............the Mu_n is not gone but only away for a while.

Peace in Christ,

Mu

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap970827.html
Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

In article , Total Eclipse
Of The M_u_n wrote:

.............the Mu_n is not gone but only away for a while.

Peace in Christ,

Mu

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap970827.html
Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

Peace at last-C----!

--
Diva
*****
The Best Man for the Job May Be A Woman

Carol you always make me laugh. LOL
Roxan
"Carol Frilegh" wrote in message
...
In article , Total Eclipse
Of The M_u_n wrote:

.............the Mu_n is not gone but only away for a while.

Peace in Christ,

Mu

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap970827.html
Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

Peace at last-C----!

--
Diva
*****
The Best Man for the Job May Be A Woman

In article , roxan
wrote:

Carol you always make me laugh. LOL
Roxan

When the Mu_n hits your eye like a big pizza pie it's probably from a
big bird like a Roose-ter!

--
Diva
*****
The Best Man for the Job May Be A Woman

Only if it is a 2Lb pizza...

--
.....( remove the " 6 " to e-mail reply )

"Carol Frilegh" wrote in message
...
In article , roxan
wrote:

Carol you always make me laugh. LOL
Roxan

When the Mu_n hits your eye like a big pizza pie it's probably from a
big bird like a Roose-ter!

--
Diva
*****
The Best Man for the Job May Be A Woman

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:14:25 -0500, "Tim Kettring"
wrote:

Only if it is a 2Lb pizza...

2Lb pizza = about 3300 calories. Some diet. NOT

In article ,
wrote:

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:14:25 -0500, "Tim Kettring"
wrote:

Only if it is a 2Lb pizza...

2Lb pizza = about 3300 calories. Some diet. NOT

OT Watched "Moonstruck" again on TV two nights ago. What a wonderful
film!

--
Diva
*****
The Best Man for the Job May Be A Woman

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 07:07:56 -0800, lid wrote:

Only if it is a 2Lb pizza...

2Lb pizza = about 3300 calories. Some diet. NOT

A large active male could lose weight on 3300 calories.

--
Ron Ritzman
http://www.panix.com/~ritzlart
Smart people can figure out my email address

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:23:15 -0500, Ron Ritzman
wrote:

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 07:07:56 -0800, lid wrote:

Only if it is a 2Lb pizza...

2Lb pizza = about 3300 calories. Some diet. NOT

A large active male could lose weight on 3300 calories.

That means that the 2Lb diet is good for loggers chopping down trees
all day. They really NEED a diet. Wasn't this dreamed up from climbing
Everest? They need a diet like this too. NOT

lid wrote:

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:23:15 -0500, Ron Ritzman
wrote:

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 07:07:56 -0800, lid wrote:

Only if it is a 2Lb pizza...

2Lb pizza = about 3300 calories. Some diet. NOT

A large active male could lose weight on 3300 calories.

That means that the 2Lb diet is good for loggers chopping down trees
all day. They really NEED a diet. Wasn't this dreamed up from climbing
Everest?

No.

See:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message.
Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not
request that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are
upset about reading this message, a few suggestions:

(1) Yell at Katchen
(2) Report Katchen to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is
described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate this Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary
and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation
has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as
a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks
He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently
opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on
every perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the
argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this and
other discussion threads.

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the
argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound
diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can
not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is
someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming
discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the
following observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
weight becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://tinyurl.com/levc
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line
(including jpegs of the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have
tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were
attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the
hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in
support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are,
using the on-line third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous
claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the
anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
one-sided insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by
cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD
or its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to
speed.

It will remain my pleasure to participate here on Usenet above the din of
hissing from the peanut gallery.


Sincerely,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com