If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
I honestly don't understand what's happening anymore. I swear I'm not
doing anything differenly than I've been doing these past 680 days, but my weight is just creeping up... After my Core experiment, when weight zoomed up from 81 kg to like 84.8, it started coming down again, slowly, when I went back to strict calorie counting. But then it hovered at 84.4 for a couple of weeks and for some reason this morning jumped to 85.8 kg! What is happening? I am not sure what to try at this point. Naturally, no matter what I do, I will not exceed my daily calorie limit of 1700, but I feel I need to change something already. This is getting very depressing. The problem is that I might simply need to eat fewer calories per day. Like maybe 1300 or 1400 instead of 1700. Maybe my metabolism has just slowed down. But I feel like a big change in calorie rules would be "setting me up for a big fall" if I suddenly tried even harder calorie restrictions. Nevertheless, looking at what WW would allocate to me, point-wise, it came to just 28 points/day (which I calculated during my free one-week online trial). That is about 1400 calories/day. Of course WW has those 35 free points per week, which comes to about 1750 calories, whereas I am giving myself just 1000. Mammoth amounts of exercise per day are also just not realistic. I know me. If I do 30 minutes to an hour of walking a day I feel I've done well. Any diet plan has to be something that can be reasonably followed - forever. If it is too cumbersome, then I know I would fall off the wagon. Speaking of exercise, WW also calculates exercise points differently than I do. I have been giving myself full calorie credit for all exercise and deducting exercise calories from calories I've eaten - and have allowed myself to carry this over all week, until I reset. I believe in WW you have to "use them or lose them" the day you do your exercise, right? Also, I don't think WW gives you full credit towards eating points for the exercise you do - doesn't come to like half, calorie-wise? Anyway, conservation of energy is conservation of energy. It's either less calories and/or more exercise. I know it. But I don't know if I really have the will power to make a radical change in a plan I've been able to stay on so long now without going off even one time... So I'm up against reality. But... it is definitely time for a diet tweak of some kind... doug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
How tall are you?
Will~ "doug lerner" wrote in message ups.com... I honestly don't understand what's happening anymore. I swear I'm not doing anything differenly than I've been doing these past 680 days, but my weight is just creeping up... After my Core experiment, when weight zoomed up from 81 kg to like 84.8, it started coming down again, slowly, when I went back to strict calorie counting. But then it hovered at 84.4 for a couple of weeks and for some reason this morning jumped to 85.8 kg! What is happening? I am not sure what to try at this point. Naturally, no matter what I do, I will not exceed my daily calorie limit of 1700, but I feel I need to change something already. This is getting very depressing. The problem is that I might simply need to eat fewer calories per day. Like maybe 1300 or 1400 instead of 1700. Maybe my metabolism has just slowed down. But I feel like a big change in calorie rules would be "setting me up for a big fall" if I suddenly tried even harder calorie restrictions. Nevertheless, looking at what WW would allocate to me, point-wise, it came to just 28 points/day (which I calculated during my free one-week online trial). That is about 1400 calories/day. Of course WW has those 35 free points per week, which comes to about 1750 calories, whereas I am giving myself just 1000. Mammoth amounts of exercise per day are also just not realistic. I know me. If I do 30 minutes to an hour of walking a day I feel I've done well. Any diet plan has to be something that can be reasonably followed - forever. If it is too cumbersome, then I know I would fall off the wagon. Speaking of exercise, WW also calculates exercise points differently than I do. I have been giving myself full calorie credit for all exercise and deducting exercise calories from calories I've eaten - and have allowed myself to carry this over all week, until I reset. I believe in WW you have to "use them or lose them" the day you do your exercise, right? Also, I don't think WW gives you full credit towards eating points for the exercise you do - doesn't come to like half, calorie-wise? Anyway, conservation of energy is conservation of energy. It's either less calories and/or more exercise. I know it. But I don't know if I really have the will power to make a radical change in a plan I've been able to stay on so long now without going off even one time... So I'm up against reality. But... it is definitely time for a diet tweak of some kind... doug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
On Apr 14, 11:56 am, "Willow Herself"
wrote: How tall are you? Will~ I'm 174 cm tall (5' 8.5") - 50 years old. doug |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what todo now...
doug lerner wrote:
I honestly don't understand what's happening anymore. I swear I'm not doing anything differenly than I've been doing these past 680 days, but my weight is just creeping up... After my Core experiment, when weight zoomed up from 81 kg to like 84.8, it started coming down again, slowly, when I went back to strict calorie counting. But then it hovered at 84.4 for a couple of weeks and for some reason this morning jumped to 85.8 kg! What is happening? I am not sure what to try at this point. Naturally, no matter what I do, I will not exceed my daily calorie limit of 1700, but I feel I need to change something already. This is getting very depressing. The problem is that I might simply need to eat fewer calories per day. Like maybe 1300 or 1400 instead of 1700. Maybe my metabolism has just slowed down. But I feel like a big change in calorie rules would be "setting me up for a big fall" if I suddenly tried even harder calorie restrictions. Nevertheless, looking at what WW would allocate to me, point-wise, it came to just 28 points/day (which I calculated during my free one-week online trial). That is about 1400 calories/day. Of course WW has those 35 free points per week, which comes to about 1750 calories, whereas I am giving myself just 1000. Mammoth amounts of exercise per day are also just not realistic. I know me. If I do 30 minutes to an hour of walking a day I feel I've done well. Any diet plan has to be something that can be reasonably followed - forever. If it is too cumbersome, then I know I would fall off the wagon. Speaking of exercise, WW also calculates exercise points differently than I do. I have been giving myself full calorie credit for all exercise and deducting exercise calories from calories I've eaten - and have allowed myself to carry this over all week, until I reset. I believe in WW you have to "use them or lose them" the day you do your exercise, right? Also, I don't think WW gives you full credit towards eating points for the exercise you do - doesn't come to like half, calorie-wise? Anyway, conservation of energy is conservation of energy. It's either less calories and/or more exercise. I know it. But I don't know if I really have the will power to make a radical change in a plan I've been able to stay on so long now without going off even one time... So I'm up against reality. But... it is definitely time for a diet tweak of some kind... doug Doug, presuming that you are sitting most of the day in the office, on the UK system you'd be on 28 points per day only: NO flex points on our system! Then you can earn as many exercise points as you like in the week, but you may only consume 14 of them: the rest go down to weight loss. And you can consume those points at any time in the week, not just on the day you earn them, so you can save them up for a party or meal out if you like! -- Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.katedicey.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
"doug lerner" wrote in message
ups.com... I honestly don't understand what's happening anymore. I swear I'm not doing anything differenly than I've been doing these past 680 days, but my weight is just creeping up... After my Core experiment, when weight zoomed up from 81 kg to like 84.8, it started coming down again, slowly, when I went back to strict calorie counting. But then it hovered at 84.4 for a couple of weeks and for some reason this morning jumped to 85.8 kg! What is happening? It could be any number of things: your body needs time to catch up, you are eating more processed foods than before causing water retension (this is not just a female problem) or you are eating some hidden calories that you not accounting for. I am not sure what to try at this point. Naturally, no matter what I do, I will not exceed my daily calorie limit of 1700, but I feel I need to change something already. This is getting very depressing. I'm at the same point myself so I can understand your frustration. The problem is that I might simply need to eat fewer calories per day. Like maybe 1300 or 1400 instead of 1700. Maybe my metabolism has just slowed down. But I feel like a big change in calorie rules would be "setting me up for a big fall" if I suddenly tried even harder calorie restrictions. You might try gradually lowering it down to 1500. WW lowers the daily point target by 1 or 2 points with each 25 pounds lost. I don't think you have done that since you started. It probably is necessary to do that if you wish to continue losing. You may have found your ideal # of calories to maintain your current weight and it is going to take reducing the calories some more in order to get the scale moving again. I would check with a site like this to see what your ideal # of calories required each day: http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/CalRequire.html that will give you an idea of what you should be eating. Nevertheless, looking at what WW would allocate to me, point-wise, it came to just 28 points/day (which I calculated during my free one-week online trial). That is about 1400 calories/day. Of course WW has those 35 free points per week, which comes to about 1750 calories, whereas I am giving myself just 1000. Mammoth amounts of exercise per day are also just not realistic. I know me. If I do 30 minutes to an hour of walking a day I feel I've done well. You are doing much better than I am in the exercise department. WW says 30-60 min a day is good. Maybe increase it a few days by 15 minutes would help. I know I do better with my weight loss efforts when the weather is nice. I like to supplement my water aerobics (3x a week) with walking but its still too cold and windy to start that routine up again. Do you "eat" those "points"? Maybe you need to only eat a limited number of those calories burned to get the weight loss going again. Any diet plan has to be something that can be reasonably followed - forever. If it is too cumbersome, then I know I would fall off the wagon. I agree. This is a way of life/way of eating not a diet. Don't make a change that you can't live with for the rest of your life or you won't be sucessful. Speaking of exercise, WW also calculates exercise points differently than I do. I have been giving myself full calorie credit for all exercise and deducting exercise calories from calories I've eaten - and have allowed myself to carry this over all week, until I reset. I believe in WW you have to "use them or lose them" the day you do your exercise, right? Also, I don't think WW gives you full credit towards eating points for the exercise you do - doesn't come to like half, calorie-wise? WW gives us 1 point per 100 calories burned. 1 point eaten is roughly 50 calories. The idea here is that exercise is for losing weight and by eating only half of the calories burned we contribute to the "calories burned needs to be greater than calories eaten" equation. That's the other reason WW limits the number of activity points eaten as well as the restriction of only eating the points earned that day. The idea is that if we only eat when we are hungry, then when we need extra food due to exercising they are available for us to use that day. We also don't HAVE to eat those activity points at all. Anyway, conservation of energy is conservation of energy. It's either less calories and/or more exercise. I know it. But I don't know if I really have the will power to make a radical change in a plan I've been able to stay on so long now without going off even one time... So I'm up against reality. But... it is definitely time for a diet tweak of some kind... A tweak, yes, but don't think of it as a diet tweak. It's a life style change that you want to investigate. But you have to be willing to make these changes gradually or I sense you feel that you will freak out. The change does not have to be radical. It could be a combination of lowered calorie, say 200 per day plus a small increase in activity, say 15 minutes a day. You may have done this before but I don't remember, how about posting a typical day or 2 of menus. Maybe we can help you tweak them to help lower the calories without freaking you out. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
"Laura" wrote in message ... "doug lerner" wrote in message ups.com... I honestly don't understand what's happening anymore. I swear I'm not doing anything differenly than I've been doing these past 680 days, but my weight is just creeping up... After my Core experiment, when weight zoomed up from 81 kg to like 84.8, it started coming down again, slowly, when I went back to strict calorie counting. But then it hovered at 84.4 for a couple of weeks and for some reason this morning jumped to 85.8 kg! What is happening? It could be any number of things: your body needs time to catch up, you are eating more processed foods than before causing water retension (this is not just a female problem) or you are eating some hidden calories that you not accounting for. I am not sure what to try at this point. Naturally, no matter what I do, I will not exceed my daily calorie limit of 1700, but I feel I need to change something already. This is getting very depressing. I'm at the same point myself so I can understand your frustration. The problem is that I might simply need to eat fewer calories per day. Like maybe 1300 or 1400 instead of 1700. Maybe my metabolism has just slowed down. But I feel like a big change in calorie rules would be "setting me up for a big fall" if I suddenly tried even harder calorie restrictions. You might try gradually lowering it down to 1500. WW lowers the daily point target by 1 or 2 points with each 25 pounds lost. I don't think you have done that since you started. It probably is necessary to do that if you wish to continue losing. You may have found your ideal # of calories to maintain your current weight and it is going to take reducing the calories some more in order to get the scale moving again. I would check with a site like this to see what your ideal # of calories required each day: http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/CalRequire.html that will give you an idea of what you should be eating. Nevertheless, looking at what WW would allocate to me, point-wise, it came to just 28 points/day (which I calculated during my free one-week online trial). That is about 1400 calories/day. Of course WW has those 35 free points per week, which comes to about 1750 calories, whereas I am giving myself just 1000. Mammoth amounts of exercise per day are also just not realistic. I know me. If I do 30 minutes to an hour of walking a day I feel I've done well. You are doing much better than I am in the exercise department. WW says 30-60 min a day is good. Maybe increase it a few days by 15 minutes would help. I know I do better with my weight loss efforts when the weather is nice. I like to supplement my water aerobics (3x a week) with walking but its still too cold and windy to start that routine up again. Do you "eat" those "points"? Maybe you need to only eat a limited number of those calories burned to get the weight loss going again. Any diet plan has to be something that can be reasonably followed - forever. If it is too cumbersome, then I know I would fall off the wagon. I agree. This is a way of life/way of eating not a diet. Don't make a change that you can't live with for the rest of your life or you won't be sucessful. Speaking of exercise, WW also calculates exercise points differently than I do. I have been giving myself full calorie credit for all exercise and deducting exercise calories from calories I've eaten - and have allowed myself to carry this over all week, until I reset. I believe in WW you have to "use them or lose them" the day you do your exercise, right? Also, I don't think WW gives you full credit towards eating points for the exercise you do - doesn't come to like half, calorie-wise? WW gives us 1 point per 100 calories burned. 1 point eaten is roughly 50 calories. The idea here is that exercise is for losing weight and by eating only half of the calories burned we contribute to the "calories burned needs to be greater than calories eaten" equation. That's the other reason WW limits the number of activity points eaten as well as the restriction of only eating the points earned that day. The idea is that if we only eat when we are hungry, then when we need extra food due to exercising they are available for us to use that day. We also don't HAVE to eat those activity points at all. Anyway, conservation of energy is conservation of energy. It's either less calories and/or more exercise. I know it. But I don't know if I really have the will power to make a radical change in a plan I've been able to stay on so long now without going off even one time... So I'm up against reality. But... it is definitely time for a diet tweak of some kind... A tweak, yes, but don't think of it as a diet tweak. It's a life style change that you want to investigate. But you have to be willing to make these changes gradually or I sense you feel that you will freak out. The change does not have to be radical. It could be a combination of lowered calorie, say 200 per day plus a small increase in activity, say 15 minutes a day. You may have done this before but I don't remember, how about posting a typical day or 2 of menus. Maybe we can help you tweak them to help lower the calories without freaking you out. I agree with Laura that perhaps you should post typical daily menus. I exercise about 5 days a week but never count those points. It just doesn't work for me if I eat too much. Audrey |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
Wow, thanks for all your replies, people. Each and every one of them
were very constructive an useful. Here are some additional thoughts. Yesterday's sudden jump in weight must have been a temporary water retention or something from the day before, because this morning I was down 1.2 kg from yesterday and back to 84.6 kg, which is the range I've been hovering in the last few weeks. Kate, that is interesting information about the different way the UK WW plan calculates and utilizes activity points. I like the fact you can save up activity points during the week. I'm surprised there are no free points to spread out over the week though. Even if I don't use them, my "bonus calories" are a vital psychological "safety buffer" for me, knowing they are there. Laura writes: "You might try gradually lowering it down to 1500. WW lowers the daily point target by 1 or 2 points with each 25 pounds lost. I don't think you have done that since you started. It probably is necessary to do that if you wish to continue losing. You may have found your ideal # of calories to maintain your current weight and it is going to take reducing the calories some more in order to get the scale moving again. " I think that is the heart of the matter. My diet concept was a little bit different from WW's here in that rather than continuing to reduce points/calories and keep weight loss linear I thought I would start with my goal weight calories and gradually coast to goal weight, even though I was losing less and less this week. The idea here was to get used to a constant calorie level I could live with the rest of my life. But since I am hovering in the 84 kg range now - and my weight has actually been hovering up and down and settling on this weight for SEVEN MONTHS now, it is obvious that I am simply eating the number of calories I need to to maintain (more or less) this weight. It might be that my metabolism is just lower than I originally thought it was. It might be that I am constantly miscalculating some calories. I had this thought yesterday: Every time I take one of my U.S. trips I tend to lose a lot of weight, Then when I get back to Tokyo weight loss stops (at least this past half year or so I've seen that trend). So I was thinking, what is the big difference between how I eat here and there? One answer is obvious - in the U.S., when travelling, I cook homemade meals a LOT less and tend to rely on pre-packaged frozen meals (Lean Cuisine, etc.) or restaurants where the calories are on the menu. Here in Tokyo I tend to cook myself from raw materials and calculate calories myself. Maybe the calories I'm calculating for things like ears of corn, chicken, lean pork, etc, are just wrong. If I weigh about 84 kg now (still down 41 kg, thankfully!) and want to get to the top range of normal BMI - that means I need to lose another 10 kg (22 lb). 10 kg is about 12% of my current weight. So it occurs to me that I can continue to calculate the way I have been - same bonus calorie plan, same way of calculating foods and exercise - but just reduce my limit by 12%. Then, over time, I should get 12% smaller, right? 12% of 1700 calories/day is 204 calories, say 200 calories for round numbers. So that means if I can just psychologically convince myself that I can live on a base of 1500 calories/day instead of 1700 calories a day then, over time, I should lose the extra weight. Or, conversely, if I can somehow do just 200 more calories of exercise a day that should make up the difference too. (I wish the Universe would give a better calorie discount on some foods though...) Or, I can borrow a bit from WW's exercise philosophy and stop giving myself too abundant a calorie credit for exercise. Laura also wrote "WW gives us 1 point per 100 calories burned. 1 point eaten is roughly 50 calories. The idea here is that exercise is for losing weight and by eating only half of the calories burned we contribute to the "calories burned needs to be greater than calories eaten" equation. " That is what I suspected - in WW you only get 1/2 of your exercise calories towards more eating. Maybe I should do that. That, in itself, would come to about 90-100 calories per day based on how I'm counting exercise these days. Also, one other thought comes to mind when I look at the spreadsheet and see when I basically stopped losing weight and then it started creeping up again. My dog, Tao, passed away in October at age 14 years 2 months old. I would always take Tao for multiple walks a day and that added up to at least 90 minutes to 2 hours of just getting out and walking around. During his last year he was walking very very slowly, and I have never counted dog walks as countable exercise, but maybe just getting out and about with Tao plus the fact that I never deducted those calories really made a difference over time. So lots of combinations to think about. Thanks, people! doug p.s. Last night I ate fresh mushrooms and eggplant sauteed in Mazola zero-calorie butter spray with garlic seasoning mixed with a few ounces of boneless white mean chicken and some oyster sauce. I calculated just about 210 calories for a very large, satisfying portion. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
Doug,
First, CONGRATS on your consistency..I admire you for that in the long time you've posted on here VS my being a yo-yo. Secondly, here are my recommedations for you. 1. Take a month and don't eat what you earn in activity points..maybe you're at a plateau and you're body needs a nudge. Some may encourage to eat your max points for a couple of weeks and then drop down to your usual pattern and not eat your earned AP's... 2. Bump up your exercise in the cardio arena to ensure you're getting your heart rate up to a Target Rate that guarantees you are burning fat. 3. Be thankful that you're still on-plan and experiencing a slight "bump" and it will pass. Glenn B TX "doug lerner" wrote in message ups.com... I honestly don't understand what's happening anymore. I swear I'm not doing anything differenly than I've been doing these past 680 days, but my weight is just creeping up... After my Core experiment, when weight zoomed up from 81 kg to like 84.8, it started coming down again, slowly, when I went back to strict calorie counting. But then it hovered at 84.4 for a couple of weeks and for some reason this morning jumped to 85.8 kg! What is happening? I am not sure what to try at this point. Naturally, no matter what I do, I will not exceed my daily calorie limit of 1700, but I feel I need to change something already. This is getting very depressing. The problem is that I might simply need to eat fewer calories per day. Like maybe 1300 or 1400 instead of 1700. Maybe my metabolism has just slowed down. But I feel like a big change in calorie rules would be "setting me up for a big fall" if I suddenly tried even harder calorie restrictions. Nevertheless, looking at what WW would allocate to me, point-wise, it came to just 28 points/day (which I calculated during my free one-week online trial). That is about 1400 calories/day. Of course WW has those 35 free points per week, which comes to about 1750 calories, whereas I am giving myself just 1000. Mammoth amounts of exercise per day are also just not realistic. I know me. If I do 30 minutes to an hour of walking a day I feel I've done well. Any diet plan has to be something that can be reasonably followed - forever. If it is too cumbersome, then I know I would fall off the wagon. Speaking of exercise, WW also calculates exercise points differently than I do. I have been giving myself full calorie credit for all exercise and deducting exercise calories from calories I've eaten - and have allowed myself to carry this over all week, until I reset. I believe in WW you have to "use them or lose them" the day you do your exercise, right? Also, I don't think WW gives you full credit towards eating points for the exercise you do - doesn't come to like half, calorie-wise? Anyway, conservation of energy is conservation of energy. It's either less calories and/or more exercise. I know it. But I don't know if I really have the will power to make a radical change in a plan I've been able to stay on so long now without going off even one time... So I'm up against reality. But... it is definitely time for a diet tweak of some kind... doug |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
with you being a numbers guy you really need to actually look at the math
formulas for points, and I also think you need to go and get one of those BMI tests where you float in the water. Lee, just thinking about information that might lead to options, Lee doug lerner wrote in message ups.com... I honestly don't understand what's happening anymore. I swear I'm not doing anything differenly than I've been doing these past 680 days, but my weight is just creeping up... After my Core experiment, when weight zoomed up from 81 kg to like 84.8, it started coming down again, slowly, when I went back to strict calorie counting. But then it hovered at 84.4 for a couple of weeks and for some reason this morning jumped to 85.8 kg! What is happening? I am not sure what to try at this point. Naturally, no matter what I do, I will not exceed my daily calorie limit of 1700, but I feel I need to change something already. This is getting very depressing. The problem is that I might simply need to eat fewer calories per day. Like maybe 1300 or 1400 instead of 1700. Maybe my metabolism has just slowed down. But I feel like a big change in calorie rules would be "setting me up for a big fall" if I suddenly tried even harder calorie restrictions. Nevertheless, looking at what WW would allocate to me, point-wise, it came to just 28 points/day (which I calculated during my free one-week online trial). That is about 1400 calories/day. Of course WW has those 35 free points per week, which comes to about 1750 calories, whereas I am giving myself just 1000. Mammoth amounts of exercise per day are also just not realistic. I know me. If I do 30 minutes to an hour of walking a day I feel I've done well. Any diet plan has to be something that can be reasonably followed - forever. If it is too cumbersome, then I know I would fall off the wagon. Speaking of exercise, WW also calculates exercise points differently than I do. I have been giving myself full calorie credit for all exercise and deducting exercise calories from calories I've eaten - and have allowed myself to carry this over all week, until I reset. I believe in WW you have to "use them or lose them" the day you do your exercise, right? Also, I don't think WW gives you full credit towards eating points for the exercise you do - doesn't come to like half, calorie-wise? Anyway, conservation of energy is conservation of energy. It's either less calories and/or more exercise. I know it. But I don't know if I really have the will power to make a radical change in a plan I've been able to stay on so long now without going off even one time... So I'm up against reality. But... it is definitely time for a diet tweak of some kind... doug |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Diet in (semi) crisis - Calories, Exercise, Points and what to do now...
Great low calorie snack/meal for "people barely able to cook".
1. Coat the fry pan liberally with that Mazola zero-calorie butter spray. Add garlic. Then throw in chopped up mushrooms and/or eggplant. 2. Add a little bit of oyster sauce and cook really well, until most of the liquids are got. Very yummy and very low calorie and very filling. If you throw in some white meat chicken you have a home cooked low calorie dinner too. I've done this for dinner the last two nights and dropped 1.2 kg and then 0.4 kg = 1.6 kg the last two days. Of course walking 8 miles yesterday could have helped too. doug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
low calories...low points...biscuits? | caistor | Weightwatchers | 4 | March 29th, 2006 03:59 PM |
Try to make counting calories or points easier | Lori via WeightAdviser.com | General Discussion | 1 | September 29th, 2005 12:10 AM |
Weight watchers points = about how many calories? | That T Woman | General Discussion | 5 | May 12th, 2004 09:41 PM |
Liquid Splenda - really ZERO points/calories/carbs | Diane | Weightwatchers | 4 | February 7th, 2004 12:28 PM |
Semi OT - 'The Wal-Mart You Don't Know' - Atkins Diet Mentioned | Dean S. Lautermilch© ²ºº³ | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 47 | December 8th, 2003 02:01 PM |